Emeline M. Aviki

Implementation of Evidence-Based Presurgical Testing Guidelines in Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery for Endometrial Cancer

PURPOSE: The aim of this quality improvement intervention was to evaluate the safety and cost savings of presurgical testing (PST) guidelines for patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometrial pathology in the ambulatory setting. METHODS: Evidence-based presurgical testing (PST) guidelines were developed by a multidisciplinary team. These guidelines were implemented on the gynecologic surgery service of a comprehensive cancer center in January 2016. All patients with a diagnosis of endometrial pathology who underwent ambulatory surgery during the specified time periods were included in this analysis. A pre-post analysis was performed (preperiod, July 2014-December 2015; postperiod, July 2016-December 2017). Rates of completed presurgical tests and perioperative adverse events were compared between time periods. Cost savings related to the reduction in PST were calculated using the direct cost of testing and reported in percentage cost reduction. RESULTS: A total of 749 hysterectomies were completed in the preperiod and 775 in the postperiod. After implementation of PST guidelines, complete blood counts, coagulation testing, comprehensive metabolic panels, chest x-rays, and electrocardiograms were reduced by 13.4%, 78.1%, 36.8%, 39.0%, and 15.5%, respectively (all P < .001). Rates of perioperative cardiopulmonary adverse events (0% v 0%) and hematologic adverse events (3.3% v 2.0%; P = .10) were stable between time periods. There were no deaths within 90 days of surgery. There was a 41.4% reduction in direct costs related to PST in the postperiod. CONCLUSION: The use of evidence-based PST guidelines for patients with endometrial pathology undergoing hysterectomy in the ambulatory setting is safe and cost-effective. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for successful development and implementation.

Impact of hospital volume on surgical management and outcomes for early-stage cervical cancer

To determine whether process and outcome measures varied for patients with early-stage cervical cancer based on hospital surgical volume. Using the National Cancer Database, we identified women with stages IA2 - IB1 cervical cancer (2011-2013). Annual hospital volume was calculated using number of hysterectomies performed in the prior year and grouped into patient level-quartiles. Centers in the highest quartile of volume were defined as HVCs; those in the lowest quartile, as LVCs. Demographics, type/mode of hysterectomy, lymph node assessment, NCCN-compliant surgery (radical hysterectomy (RH) with LND), and survival outcomes were compared across quartiles of hospital volume. Cox Proportional Hazards model was performed to determine impact of volume on mortality. We identified 3469 women treated at 598 different hospitals. RH was more likely at HVCs versus LVCs (68.9% vs. 59.6%, p < 0.001). LND was more likely at HVCs versus LVCs (96.1% vs 87.3%, p < 0.001). Patients treated at HVCs were 11.4% more likely to receive guideline-compliant surgery compared to LVCs (67.8% vs. 56.4%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in 5-year survival, 90-day survival, all-cause mortality across volume quartiles. Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower at HVCs (0 deaths in 880 patients) versus LVCs (1 in 1058 (0.1%, p = 0.02)). Age ≥ 80, Medicaid and Medicare insurance, Hispanic race, and poorly differentiated histology were independent predictors of mortality. Hospital volume was not found to be an independent predictor of mortality (p = 0.95). HVCs demonstrated higher rates of NCCN-recommended surgery for early-stage cervical cancer. There was no association between hospital volume and survival.