Emanuele Perrone

Are all mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancers created equal? A large, retrospective, tertiary center experience

One third of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) presents with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). Of these, 70 % are caused by somatic hypermethylation of MLH1 promoter; the remaining cases are determined by Lynch syndrome or double somatic inactivation of MMR genes. Although associated with good-intermediate prognosis, heterogeneity in treatment response and survival has been reported among MMRd ECs. We aim to investigate differences in pathologic aggressiveness and event-free survival (EFS) among three MMRd EC subtypes, classified by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MLH1 methylation analysis. Subjects undergone surgical staging for EC were retrospectively included. IHC analysis was performed in all patients to assess MMR and p53 status. Methylation analysis was performed in MMRd patients with IHC-negative MLH1. The MMRd population was classified into: 1)MLH1-hypermethylated (MLH1-HyMet); 2)MLH1-unmethylated (MLH1-UnMet); 3)IHC-negative MSH2 and/or MSH6 or PMS2 alone (non-MLH1). Of 1171 patients undergoing surgical staging and IHC assessment, 362 (30.9 %) were classified as MMRd and included in the analysis. Among these, 59.7 % (n = 216) were MLH1-HyMet, 11 % (n = 40) MLH1-UnMet, and 29.3 % (n = 106) non-MLH1. Compared to MLH1-UnMet and non-MLH1, MLH1-HyMet was associated with older age, higher BMI, larger tumor size, deeper myometrial invasion, substantial lymphovascular space invasion, lower frequency of early-stage and low-risk disease. EFS was similar when comparing the MMRd subtypes, even after adjusting for stage and tumor histology. However, a trend of MLH1-HyMet toward poorer prognosis can be observed, particularly in the advanced/metastatic setting. MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd ECs display more aggressive clinicopathologic features compared to the other MMRd subgroups. However, although a suggestive trend toward poorer EFS was observed in the hypermethylated subset, particularly in the advanced setting, no significant differences in prognosis were detected among the MMRd subtypes.

MIRaGE (Minimally Invasive suRGery in recurrent Endometrial cancer)

Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecologic malignancies. Recurrence occurs in 10% to 15% of early-stage and up to 70% of advanced-stage cases. Secondary cytoreductive surgery is critical when complete gross resection is achievable. Minimally invasive surgery may offer perioperative advantages, but data on patient selection and oncologic outcomes are limited. This retrospective study included patients with first abdominal recurrence of endometrial cancer who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS between 2010 and 2023. Patients were grouped by surgical approach (minimally invasive surgery [MIS]: laparoscopy/robotic-assisted vs open surgery). The primary endpoint was the identification of clinical and radiological preoperative predictors of successful MIS, defined as complete gross resection. Secondary endpoints included intraoperative and perioperative outcomes, and survival outcomes (overall survival and progression-free survival). Among 192 patients with abdominal recurrence, 74 (38.5%) underwent MIS. The 2 groups were not fully homogeneous, differing mainly in relapse site and recurrence pattern; nevertheless, complete gross resection was achieved in 97.3% of minimally invasive procedures and 94.9% of open surgeries (p = .42). Minimally invasive surgery was associated with lower blood loss (p < .001), fewer transfusions (p = .030), shorter operative times (p < .001), and reduced hospital stays (p < .001). Independent predictors of successful MIS were body mass index ≥30, early-stage disease, single-site relapse, and loco-regional or lymph-node recurrence. No significant differences were observed in survival outcomes, with comparable overall survival (p = .47) and progression-free survival (p = .43) between groups. Minimally invasive surgery may represent a feasible option for selected patients with recurrent endometrial cancer, providing perioperative advantages with comparable survival outcomes. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to confirm oncologic safety and to refine patient selection, also in the context of integration with novel therapies.

Sentinel node–positive POLE-mutated endometrial cancer

The molecular classification of endometrial cancer has revolutionized risk stratification, with POLE-mutated tumors recognized for their excellent prognosis. However, the optimal management of patients with nodal involvement remains unclear. This multi-center retrospective study evaluates the outcomes of patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer with positive sentinel lymph nodes harboring POLE mutations. Of 164 POLE-mutated cases undergoing sentinel node mapping, 11 (6.7%) had nodal metastases (classified as isolated tumor cells [n = 6; 54.5%], micro-metastases [n = 3; 27.3%], or macro-metastases [n = 2; 18.2%]). All patients except 1 received adjuvant therapy, tailored according to molecular and pathologic risk factors. After a median follow-up of 7.6 months, no recurrences were observed. These findings suggest excellent short-term outcomes, even in node-positive POLE-mutated endometrial cancer. Nevertheless, the study does not support omitting adjuvant therapy in this setting. Larger studies and long-term data, such as those expected from the ongoing Refining Adjuvant treatment IN endometrial cancer Based On molecular features (RAINBO)/ Blue trial are needed to guide safe de-escalation strategies.

Impact of surgery and molecular classification in stage IV endometrial cancer

Evidence supporting the role of surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer remains limited. Additionally, the prognostic relevance of molecular classification in this setting is poorly defined. We aimed to evaluate overall survival in patients with peritoneal and/or extra-abdominal spread, focusing on surgical approach and molecular sub-type. We retrospectively analyzed all patients with Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique 2009 stage IVB (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique 2023 IIIB2, IVB, IVC) endometrial cancer treated between January 2012 and September 2023. Patients were stratified according to immunohistochemistry-based molecular classification, intra-abdominal disease extension, and treatment strategy. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess overall survival. Differences across groups were evaluated using appropriate nonparametric and categorical statistical tests. Among 363 eligible patients, 229 (63.1%) underwent primary cytoreduction, 52 (14.3%) had interval debulking surgery, 55 (15.2%) received chemotherapy alone, and 27 (7.4%) were untreated. Patients receiving neoadjuvant or exclusive chemotherapy more frequently had extra-abdominal (p < .001) and upper abdominal disease (p < .001). In patients with extra-pelvic disease, overall survival was comparable between primary and interval surgery (p = .82). Among those treated with neoadjuvant treatment, surgical cytoreduction was strongly associated with improved overall survival (p < .001). Mismatch repair-deficient patients had better overall survival than those with p53 abnormal tumors (34 vs 21 months, p = .026). No specific molecular profile-estrogen receptor positive tumors showed longer overall survival than both p53 abnormal and no specific molecular profile-estrogen receptor negative sub-types (60 vs 34 and 21 months, p = .018 and p = .041, respectively). In multivariate analysis, extra-pelvic disease (p = .042) and exclusive chemotherapy (p < .0001) were independent negative prognostic factors. In advanced endometrial cancer, surgery remains a key component of management. Our findings suggest a potential survival advantage for patients who undergo surgery-either as primary treatment or following neoadjuvant chemotherapy-compared to those treated with chemotherapy alone. Molecular classification may offer prognostic insight even in stage IV disease, although further validation is required. These findings provide a benchmark for future studies in the evolving landscape of immunotherapy and personalized treatment.

Exploring isolated tumor cells entity in endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) management includes nodal staging and molecular classification. Despite molecular advancements, the biological significance of isolated tumor cells (ITC) in EC remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize ITC in the context of pathological and molecular features MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective analysis included EC patients diagnosed between June 2018 and May 2024 who underwent surgical staging via sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and molecular profiling. ITC cases detected through SLN ultrastaging or One Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) were compared with N0 and N + (micro-/macrometastasis) groups. Among the 1821 patients included, nodal status was N0 in 84.5 %, ITC in 5.1 %, micrometastases in 5.3 %, and macrometastases in 4.5 %. ITC patients exhibited deep myometrial invasion in 67.7 % of cases vs. 28.7 % in N0 (p < 0.001). Diffuse lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) was significantly higher in ITC (52.1 %) than N0 (12.2 %, p < 0.001). MMR deficiency was more frequent in ITC (33.3 %) vs. N0 (25.0 %, p = 0.07). POLE mutations were more common in N0 (4.2 %) and ITC (3.1 %) vs. N + (1.1 %), though not statistically significant. p53-abnormal tumors were significantly associated with N + status (19.4 %) compared to ITC (7.3 %, OR 0.33, p = 0.008). No relapses occurred among ITC patients with low-risk features. These findings suggest that ITC may represent an early form of nodal involvement, biologically distinct from micro- and macrometastases. The association with MMR deficiency and the absence of aggressive markers such as p53 abnormalities support a less aggressive profile. Integrating molecular and pathological features may refine risk stratification and inform management strategies for EC patients with ITC.

Laparoscopic vs. robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer staging: large retrospective single-institution study

The aim of this study is to analyze and draw the potential differences between the robotic-assisted surgery (RS) and the laparoscopy (LPS) in endometrial cancer staging. In this single-institution retrospective study we enrolled 1,221 consecutive clinical stage I-III endometrial cancer patients undergone minimally invasive surgical staging. We compared patients treated by LPS and by RS, on the basis of perioperative and oncological outcomes (disease-free survival [DFS] and overall survival [OS]). A sub-analysis of the high-risk endometrial cancer population was performed in the 2 cohorts. The 2 cohorts (766 treated by LPS and 455 by RS) were homogeneous in terms of perioperative and pathological data. We recorded differences in number of relapse/progression (11.7% in LPS vs. 7% in RS, p=0.008) and in number of deaths (9.8% in LPS vs. 4.8% in RS, p=0.002). Whereas, univariate and multivariate analyses according to DFS and OS confirmed that the surgical approach did not influence the DFS or the OS. In the multivariable analysis the association of the age and grading was significant for DFS and OS. In the sub-analysis of the 426 high risk EC patients (280 in LPS and 146 in RS) the univariate and the multivariate confirmed the influence of the age in DFS and OS, independently of the minimally invasive approach. In our large retrospective analysis, we confirmed that the RS and LPS have similar efficacy and safety for endometrial cancer staging also for the high-risk endometrial cancer patients.

Sacituzumab govitecan, an antibody‐drug conjugate targeting trophoblast cell‐surface antigen 2, shows cytotoxic activity against poorly differentiated endometrial adenocarcinomas in vitro and in vivo

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries. The antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) sacituzumab govitecan (SG) targets trophoblast cell‐surface antigen‐2 (Trop‐2) – a cell‐surface glycoprotein highly expressed in many epithelial tumors – and delivers the active metabolite of irinotecan SN‐38 to Trop‐2‐positive tumor cells. We evaluated Trop‐2 expression in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EC) tissues and the activity of SG against primary poorly differentiated EC cell lines and xenografts. Trop‐2 expression was assessed in 143 formalin‐fixed–paraffin‐embedded tumors and seven primary tumor cell lines by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, respectively. Cell viability of primary tumor cell lines was assessed following exposure to SG, or control antibodies. Antibody‐dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) against Trop‐2‐positive and Trop‐2‐negative EC cell lines was measured in vitro using 4‐h chromium release assays. A Trop‐2‐positive EC xenograft model was used to determine the in vivo activity of SG. Moderate‐to‐strong staining was detected in 84% (120/143) of EC samples, whereas 43% (3/7) of the primary EC cell lines tested overexpressed Trop‐2. EC cell lines overexpressing Trop‐2 were significantly more sensitive to SG compared to control ADC (P = 0.014 and P = 0.005). Both SG and the unconjugated parental antibody hRS7 mediated high ADCC against Trop‐2‐positive cell lines. Moreover, SG induced significant bystander killing of Trop‐2‐negative tumors cocultured with Trop‐2‐positive tumors. In the xenograft model, intravenous administration of SG twice weekly for three weeks was well tolerated and demonstrated impressive tumor growth inhibition against poorly differentiated, chemotherapy‐resistant EC xenografts (P = 0.011). In summary, SG is a novel ADC with remarkable preclinical activity against poorly differentiated EC cell lines overexpressing Trop‐2. These findings warrant future clinical trials.

The impact of Substantial LYMphovascular space invasion on sentinel lymph nodes status and recurrence in Endometrial Cancer patients: SLYM-EC a multicenter retrospective study

To evaluate the prognostic impact of substantial lymph vascular space invasion (LVSI) on the sentinel lymph node involvement and recurrence rate of patients with apparent uterine-confined endometrial cancer. We enrolled consecutive patients with apparent confined endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging with sentinel node mapping from 14 European reference centers. LVSI was analyzed semi-quantitatively, according to a 3-tiered scoring system classified as absent, focal, and substantial. Among 2352 eligible patients, 1980 were included in the analysis. Upon final pathology 226 patients (11.4 %) had SLNs involvement. LVSI was diagnosed focal in 152 patients (7.7 %), whereas 357 patients (18.0 %) showed substantial LVSI. Focal or substantial LVSI rate were significantly higher in patients with positive SLNs when compared to patients without SLNs involvement (p < 0.0001). On overall patient-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of LVSI for sentinel lymph node metastases were 73 %, 80 %, 32 %, and 96 %, respectively. The 3-year multivariate analysis of recurrence-free survival showed that only the presence of substantial LVSI, and grade 3 disease were associated with relapse. Neither positive sentinel lymph node, deep myometrial infiltration, nor age at surgery were statistically significant. In patients having undergone sentinel node biopsy, positive LVSI demonstrated moderate sensitivity and reasonable specificity in detecting SLN involvement. LVSI positivity does not correlate with nodal involvement. The presence of substantial LVSI remains a strong independent risk factor for recurrence, indicating a role for potential hematogenous dissemination in patients with early-stage disease.