Elizabeth D. Euscher

Clinical and Genomic Landscape of RAS Mutations in Gynecologic Cancers

Abstract Purpose: We aimed to describe RAS mutations in gynecologic cancers as they relate to clinicopathologic and genomic features, survival, and therapeutic implications. Experimental Design: Gynecologic cancers with available somatic molecular profiling data at our institution between February 2010 and August 2022 were included and grouped by RAS mutation status. Overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and multivariable analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Of 3,328 gynecologic cancers, 523 (15.7%) showed any RAS mutation. Patients with RAS-mutated tumors were younger (57 vs. 60 years nonmutated), had a higher prevalence of endometriosis (27.3% vs. 16.9%), and lower grades (grade 1/2, 43.2% vs. 8.1%, all P < 0.0001). The highest prevalence of KRAS mutation was in mesonephric-like endometrial (100%, n = 9/9), mesonephric-like ovarian (83.3%, n = 5/6), mucinous ovarian (60.4%), and low-grade serous ovarian (44.4%) cancers. After adjustment for age, cancer type, and grade, RAS mutation was associated with worse overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.3; P = 0.001]. Specific mutations were in KRAS (13.5%), NRAS (2.0%), and HRAS (0.51%), most commonly KRAS G12D (28.4%) and G12V (26.1%). Common co-mutations were PIK3CA (30.9%), PTEN (28.8%), ARID1A (28.0%), and TP53 (27.9%), of which 64.7% were actionable. RAS + MAPK pathway-targeted therapies were administered to 62 patients with RAS-mutated cancers. While overall survival was significantly higher with therapy [8.4 years [(95% confidence interval (CI), 5.5–12.0) vs. 5.5 years (95% CI, 4.6–6.6); HR = 0.67; P = 0.031], this effect did not persist in multivariable analysis. Conclusions: RAS mutations in gynecologic cancers have a distinct histopathologic distribution and may impact overall survival. PIK3CA, PTEN, and ARID1A are potentially actionable co-alterations. RAS pathway-targeted therapy should be considered.

Reproducibility of scoring criteria for HER2 immunohistochemistry in endometrial serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional interobserver agreement study

Targeted anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy has recently been proven to improve progression-free and overall survival of patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial serous carcinoma. To date, no specific pathology HER2 testing or scoring guidelines exist for endometrial cancer. However, based on evidence from the recent successful clinical trial and comprehensive pre-trial pathologic studies, a new set of HER2 scoring criteria have been proposed for endometrial serous carcinoma-distinct from the existing breast and gastric cancer-specific criteria. We present the first study assessing interobserver agreement of HER2 scores using the proposed serous endometrial cancer-specific scoring system. A digitally scanned set of 40 HER2-immunostained slides of endometrial serous carcinoma were sent to seven gynecologic pathologists, who independently assigned HER2 scores for each slide following a brief tutorial. Follow-up fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2 gene amplification was performed on cases with interobserver disagreement when a 2+ HER2 score was assigned by at least one observer. Complete agreement of HER2 scores among all 7 observers was achieved on 15 cases, and all but one case had an agreement by at least 4 observers. The overall agreement was 72.3% (kappa 0.60), 77.5% (kappa 0.65), and 83.3% (kappa 0.65), using four (0 to 3+ ), three (0/1+ , 2+ , 3+ ), or two (0/1+ , 2/3+ ) HER2 scoring categories, respectively. Based on the combination of HER2 immunostaining scores and FISH, the interobserver disagreement may have potentially resulted in a clinically significant difference in HER2 status only in three tumors. We conclude, that the proposed serous endometrial cancer-specific HER2 scoring criteria are reproducible among gynecologic pathologists with moderate to substantial interobserver agreement rates comparable to those of previously reported in breast and gastric carcinomas. Our findings significantly strengthen the foundation for establishing endometrial cancer-specific HER2 scoring guidelines in the future.

Gynaecological malignancies and sentinel lymph node mapping: an update

Assessment of pelvic, para‐aortic or inguinal lymph nodes (LNs) provides not only important prognostic information, but also determines the need for adjuvant treatment. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has the potential to provide this prognostic information, while reducing morbidity compared with extended LN dissection. This review discusses the clinical and pathological aspects of SLN biopsy in gynaecological cancer.