Elisa Scarpelli

Exploring PIPAC for managing platinum resistant and refractory ovarian cancer with peritoneal spread: A collaborative multi-institutional study

Platinum-resistant or refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains a significant clinical challenge, often leading to rapid progression and poor prognosis. Palliative treatments aimed at improving quality of life are warranted. To assess the feasibility and potential benefits of Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with platinum-resistant or refractory EOC. Prospective multicenter observational study (2016-2023). feasibility, defined as completion of ≥3 planned PIPAC cycles within 120 days without ≥ grade 3 treatment related adverse events (CTCAE v5.0). Secondary endpoints: safety; disease control (RECIST 1.1); changes in Peritoneal Cancer Index and Fagotti score; ascites control; CA-125 response; conversion to cytoreductive surgery (±HIPEC); and overall survival (OS). Forty patients were enrolled. Ninety-seven percent of procedures were completed. Feasibility was 65.0 % (26/40; 95 % CI 49.51-77.87); no grade ≥3 events occurred. Key secondary outcomes included a clinical benefit rate of 35 % in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and 53.8 % in the per-protocol (PP) population, median time to ascites resolution of one cycle, and median overall survival of 14 months (17 months in PP). Higher white blood cell count and ascites volume were significantly associated with progression (p = 0.035 and p = 0.025). Three platinum-refractory patients became eligible for surgery, two underwent optimal cytoreduction. Median OS was 14 months (17 months in PP). A non-significant trend toward longer OS was observed in platinum-refractory versus platinum-resistant disease (18 vs 9 months; p = 0.093). PIPAC is a feasible, well-tolerated option in platinum-resistant and refractory EOC with potential to stabilize disease, relieve ascites and enable surgery in selected cases.

Exploring isolated tumor cells entity in endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) management includes nodal staging and molecular classification. Despite molecular advancements, the biological significance of isolated tumor cells (ITC) in EC remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize ITC in the context of pathological and molecular features MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective analysis included EC patients diagnosed between June 2018 and May 2024 who underwent surgical staging via sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and molecular profiling. ITC cases detected through SLN ultrastaging or One Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) were compared with N0 and N + (micro-/macrometastasis) groups. Among the 1821 patients included, nodal status was N0 in 84.5 %, ITC in 5.1 %, micrometastases in 5.3 %, and macrometastases in 4.5 %. ITC patients exhibited deep myometrial invasion in 67.7 % of cases vs. 28.7 % in N0 (p < 0.001). Diffuse lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) was significantly higher in ITC (52.1 %) than N0 (12.2 %, p < 0.001). MMR deficiency was more frequent in ITC (33.3 %) vs. N0 (25.0 %, p = 0.07). POLE mutations were more common in N0 (4.2 %) and ITC (3.1 %) vs. N + (1.1 %), though not statistically significant. p53-abnormal tumors were significantly associated with N + status (19.4 %) compared to ITC (7.3 %, OR 0.33, p = 0.008). No relapses occurred among ITC patients with low-risk features. These findings suggest that ITC may represent an early form of nodal involvement, biologically distinct from micro- and macrometastases. The association with MMR deficiency and the absence of aggressive markers such as p53 abnormalities support a less aggressive profile. Integrating molecular and pathological features may refine risk stratification and inform management strategies for EC patients with ITC.

Proton Beam Therapy in Gynecological Cancers: A Systematic Review of Indications, Complications, and Limitations

Background and Objectives: Gynecological cancers frequently require radiation therapy (RT) in primary, adjuvant, or salvage settings. However, photon-based RT is associated with non-negligible toxicity, and treatment of pelvic recurrences after prior irradiation remains challenging. Proton beam therapy (PBT), due to its favorable dose distribution and reduced exposure of organs at risk (OARs), has emerged as a potential alternative, particularly in re-irradiation scenarios. Despite its expanding use in other malignancies, evidence supporting PBT in gynecologic cancers remains limited. This systematic review aims to investigate the use of PBT in gynecological cancers and its associated complications. Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. A comprehensive search (2000–2025) identified studies investigating PBT in gynecologic cancers. Eligible designs included randomized trials and prospective and retrospective series. Reported adverse events were categorized as GI, GU, or other, and only grade ≥3 CT-CAE complications were considered. Results: Of 580 records screened, 9 studies comprising 232 patients met inclusion criteria. Most patients were treated for endometrial (n = 147) or cervical (n = 75) cancer; 90 received chemotherapy. Overall, severe toxicity occurred in 15.2% of patients. GI complications ranged from 0–14% and GU from 0–33%. Complication rates were lowest in adjuvant or de novo treatment series (0–10%), whereas re-irradiation cohorts showed higher rates (up to 33% GU). Comparative studies suggested a possible advantage of PBT over IMRT, particularly for GI toxicity, though data remain limited. Conclusions: Severe GI and GU toxicity after PBT in gynecologic cancers appears infrequent, particularly in primary and adjuvant settings, though re-irradiation remains challenging. Current evidence is restricted to small and heterogeneous studies. Ongoing phase II trials will provide prospective data to clarify feasibility, toxicity, and long-term outcomes. Until then, PBT in gynecologic oncology should be regarded as investigational.