Elena Ratner

Preclinical Activity of Datopotamab Deruxtecan, an Antibody–Drug Conjugate Targeting Trophoblast Cell-Surface Antigen 2, in Uterine Serous Carcinoma

Abstract Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is a rare subset of endometrial cancer with a poor prognosis and high recurrence rate. Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is a novel antibody–drug conjugate (ADC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the preclinical activity of Dato-DXd in USC in vitro against primary USC cell lines with various trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP2) expression and in vivo in TROP2-overexpressing cell line–derived mice xenografts. USC primary tumor cell lines were treated with Dato-DXd and a control ADC (CTL ADC) to evaluate cell viability following exposure. Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity against TROP2-overexpressing and -nonexpressing cell lines was evaluated using a 4-hour chromium release assay. USC xenografts in mice were treated with Dato-DXd, CTL ADC, datopotamab, and vehicle to assess the in vivo effects via retro-orbital Dato-DXd administration. We found USC cell lines with TROP2 overexpression to be significantly more sensitive to killing induced by Dato-DXd compared with CTL ADC in vitro (e.g., IC50: 0.11 µmol/L vs. 30.07 µmol/L, P = 0.0074 and 0.11 µmol/L vs. 48.95 µmol/L, P = 0.0127, respectively). Dato-DXd induced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in the presence of peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy donors. TROP2-nonexpressing cell lines demonstrated minimal killing by Dato-DXd; however, when admixed with TROP2-overexpressing cells, a significant bystander effect was appreciated. In vivo, mice xenografts overexpressing TROP2 treated with Dato-DXd demonstrated tumor growth suppression and longer overall survival compared with CTL ADC–treated xenografts. These data demonstrate Dato-DXd to be highly active against TROP2-overexpressing USC in vitro and in vivo. Our preclinical activity results warrant future clinical trials for patients with advanced or recurrent USC. Significance: Targeted treatment of USC using the biomarker TROP2 represents a significant opportunity for further treatment options for patients already resistant to other lines of treatment. In this study, we present data showing preclinical evidence of effectiveness of this biomarker-targeted therapy in USC.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Imiquimod with or without 9-Valent HPV Vaccine versus Observation in Patients with High-grade Pre-neoplastic Cervical Lesions (NCT02864147)

Abstract Purpose: We report the results of a randomized phase II trial of imiquimod, a topical immune-response modulator versus imiquimod plus a 9-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine (9vHPV) versus clinical surveillance in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2/3) patients. Patients and Methods: We randomly allocated 133 patients with untreated CIN2/3 in equal proportions to a 4-month treatment with self-applied vaginal suppositories containing imiquimod (Arm B) or imiquimod plus a 9vHPV (Arm C) versus clinical surveillance (Arm A). The main outcome was efficacy, defined as histologic regression to CIN1 or less. Secondary outcomes were HPV clearance and tolerability. Exploratory objectives included the comparison of cervical CD4/CD8 T-cell infiltration at baseline, mid-study, and posttreatment by flow cytometry among study arms. Results: Of the 114 evaluable patients 77% and 23% harbored CIN2 and CIN3, respectively. Regression to CIN1 or less was observed in 95% of patients in the imiquimod group (Arm B) compared with 79% in the control/surveillance (Arm A); P = 0.043 and 84% in the imiquimod+9vHPV group (Arm C; P = 0.384 vs. Arm A). Neither of the treatment-arm differences from Arm A reached the prespecified α = 0.025 significance level. No significant differences were noted in the secondary outcome of rate of HPV clearance. The number of tissue-resident memory CD4/CD8 T cells in cytobrush samples demonstrated a >5-fold increase in Arm B/imiquimod when compared with Arm A/surveillance (P < 0.01). In contrast, there was no significant difference in T-cell responses among participants in Arm C when compared with Arm A. Imiquimod treatment was well tolerated. Conclusions: Although imiquimod induced a higher regression to CIN1 or less and significant increases in CD4/CD8 T cells infiltrating the cervix, it did not meet its prespecified statistical outcome for efficacy. A higher regression rate than expected was observed in the surveillance arm of this prospective trial. Future clinical trials with imiquimod targeting CIN3 patients are warranted.