Elena Kashuba

STK4 protein expression pattern follows different trends in endometrioid and serous endometrial adenocarcinoma upon tumor progression

AbstractIn a previous study, we showed that serine/threonine-protein kinase 4 (STK4) is involved in the control on proliferation and migration of endometrial cancer (EC) cells in vitro. In the present paper, we studied STK4 expression in EC tissues from a large cohort of patients to determine whether STK4 can serve as a marker for the aggressiveness and prognosis of EC. Tissue samples from patients with EC were examined for tumor type, grade, and stage. The STK4 protein expression in EC cells was assessed by immunohistochemistry and related to clinicopathological data of patients, such as progression and patient survival rate. The STK4 mRNA levels and its relation to the survival rate were analyzed also in publicly available databases. The STK4 gene expression was low at both, the mRNA and protein levels in EC, especially in serous tumors. Comparison of STK4 expression with the patient survival rate shows that the higher expression is associated with worse prognosis in serous EC, while no such dependence was found in endometrioid EC. Hence, the determination of the SKT4 expression pattern could be used as a putative prognostic marker for serous EC.

Upregulation of PKN1 as a Prognosis Biomarker for Endometrial Cancer

Background Several markers of survival among endometrial cancer (EC) patients have been proposed, namely, the oncoprotein stathmin, RAF kinase inhibitor (RKIP), Cyclin A, GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3), and growth and differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15). Their elevated expression correlated significantly with a high stage, serous papillary/clear cell subtypes, and aneuploidy. In a previous study, we reported the elevated expression of the serine/threonine protein kinase N1 (PKN1) in cancerous cells. In the present paper, we studied PKN1 expression in EC tissues from a large cohort of patients, to determine whether PKN1 can serve as a marker for the aggressiveness and prognosis of EC, and/or as a marker of survival among EC patients. Methods Tissue samples from EC patients were examined retrospectively for tumor type, tumor size, FIGO stage and grade, depth of invasion in the myometrium, and presence of lymph node metastasis. The PKN1 protein expression in EC cells was assessed by immunohistochemistry. PKN1 mRNA levels were analyzed in publicly available databases, using bioinformatic tools. Results We found that expression of PKN1 at the mRNA and proteins levels tended to increase in high-grade EC samples (P = .0001 and P = .06, respectively). In addition, patients with metastatic disease had higher PKN1 mRNA levels (P = .02). Moreover, patients with high PKN1 expression could be characterized by poorer survival. Conclusions We have shown a trend of the higher PKN1 expression levels in EC patients with poor prognosis. Therefore, PKN1 might be considered as a candidate prognostic marker for EC.