E. Katsanevakis

Is routine gastrointestinal endoscopy required in every woman with mucinous ovarian cancer? An analysis of survival rates and metastatic tumours in a cancer centre

Mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC) represents a rare entity of ovarian malignant neoplasms. The true incidence could be as low as 3% of all ovarian cancers. The aim of this study is to compare and understand the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with mucinous ovarian cancer, report on the survival rates and evaluate the role of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy as part of the peri-operative investigations and the impact it has on the survival rates. This is a retrospective data collection on patients with MOC operated in Nottingham gynaecological oncology centre over a 10-year period. Data were analysed using SPSS software. 43 cases were included in the final analysis. The median maximal tumour diameter was 180 mm. 32 (74.5 %) and 11 (25.5 %) women presented with unilateral and bilateral tumours respectively. 30 patients (69.7 %) presented with stage 1 disease, 1 (2.3 %) presented with stage 2 disease, 7 women (16.4 %) had stage 3 disease and 1 woman (11.6 %) had stage 4 disease. 41 women had staging surgical procedures and 2 women had limited surgery due to poor performance status. After final histology, 5 cases found to have metastatic disease to the ovary rather than primary MOC. 14 women had GI endoscopy as part of their investigation. The total estimated cost of the endoscopies that have been performed is £5635. Primary GI cancer was diagnosed in 1 case during the endoscopy (1 case of gastric cancer). The 5-year overall survival of the women included in this study is 62.8 %. The 5-year overall survival of the women in the endoscopy and non-endoscopy groups was 60 % and 64.3 % respectively (p-value: 0.767). The findings of this study show that the survival rates of patients treated for mucinous ovarian cancer in our centre are similar to other published studies. Our findings do not support the routine use of GI endoscopy in the peri-operative investigations of every patient with MOC due to the non-statistically significant difference in the overall survival.

A study of recurrence, complication and survival rates in patients with early stage vulval cancer undergoing sentinel lymph node sampling: a single-centre experience

Groin sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification and removal has become a standard of care for women with clinical early stage vulval cancer. There is evidence to support safe detection of the SLN with minimal morbidity. The purpose of this study is to report our experience of managing patients focusing on patient selection, adverse events, quality assurance of the procedure and any benefits and/or disadvantages to patients. This was a retrospective study of patients with clinical early stage vulval cancer in a cancer centre over 5 years. Notes and hospital data were reviewed including admissions to emergency departments. Statistical software was used for the statistical analysis and the Kaplan Meier survival curve was generated to present survival rates. 61 cases were analysed. A total of 156 nodes have been removed and positive nodes were identified in 14 cases. In total, 9 women (14.75%) had disease recurrence within 5 years from primary surgery. Overall, 4 patients (6.5%) developed groin recurrence. In 3 of these patients there was isolated groin recurrence (4.9%). The median length of admission was 3 days and 6 cases were managed as day cases. Since the closure of the GROINNS-2 trial we have continued the procedure of SLN identification for women with clinical early stage vulval cancer. We have shown high level of adherence to our protocol and survival and complication rates comparable to other studies on the same field. There were a few patients managed as day-case which was of benefit to the patients.