Domenico Albano

[18F]FDG PET/CT and CA-125 in the evaluation of ovarian cancer relapse or persistence: is there any correlation?

Ovarian cancer relapse can be diagnosed by serum tumor markers measurements and 18F-fluorodoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT) findings. The aim of our study was to analyze the potential relationship between cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) and PET/CT results in patients affected by ovarian cancer. Ninety-two [18F]FDG PET/CT scans in sixty-one patients with diagnosis of ovarian cancer were analyzed and compared to CA-125 values. PET/CT results were compared to other imaging modalities, histology or follow-up data in order to define its diagnostic accuracy. PET/CT studies were analyzed qualitatively and semiquantitatively by measuring the maximum and mean standardized uptake value body weight max (SUVbw max, SUVbw mean), maximum SUV lean body mass (SUVlbm), maximum SUV body surface area (SUVbsa), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of hypermetabolic lesions. All measurements were compared with CA-125 values. Twenty PET/CT studies were true negative, sixty-three true positive, five false positive and four false negative with sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 80%, negative predictive value of 83%, positive predictive value of 93% and accuracy of 90%. CA-125 levels were significantly correlated with PET/CT results and all PET/CT semiquantitative parameters. CA-125 cutoff values of 17 UI/mL is the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between positive and negative PET/CT result. [18F]FDG PET/CT has good accuracy in evaluating patients with relapse or persistance of ovarian cancer. CA-125 levels were significantly correlated with metabolic PET/CT parameters.

Clinical and prognostic 18F-FDG PET/CT role in recurrent vulvar cancer: a multicentric experience

Abstract Purpose The aim of this retrospective multicentric study was to investigate the diagnostic performance, the prognostic value and the impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT on treatment decision-making in patients with suspected recurrent vulvar cancer (VC). Materials and methods Sixty-three patients affected by VC performed 18F-FDG-PET/CT for restaging purposes in case of suspected clinical and/or radiological recurrence. Histopatology results if available and/or clinical-imaging follow-up for at least 12 months were considered as reference standard. The diagnostic accuracy and the clinical impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT were investigated. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan–Meier curves. Results Fifty-two (82.5%) PET/CT showed the presence of recurrence, while the remaining 11 (17.5%) were negative. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of PET/CT were 100% (95%CI 93–100%), 92% (95%CI 62–100%), 98% (95%CI 89–99%), 100% and 98% (95%CI 92–100%). A relevant impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was registered in 28 cases: in 12 cases moving from local therapy to chemotherapy due to the recognition of disseminate localizations; in 10 showing the site of recurrence in presence of negative conventional imaging, and in 6 cases confirming to be true negative and avoiding unnecessary therapies. Beside advanced age and HPV status, a positive restaging 18F-FDG PET/CT scan was significantly correlated with shorter PFS and OS compared to negative scan (p < 0.001). Conclusions 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated to be an accurate tool in the assessing of recurrent VC with high sensitivity and specificity and with a significant impact on clinical decision-making. Restaging 18F-FDG PET/CT findings were associated with survival.