Investigator

Dmitry Zaletaev

Research Centre For Medical Genetics

DZDmitry Zaletaev
Papers(1)
Molecular Subgroups o…
Collaborators(6)
Nataliya Chernorubash…Svetlana KhokhlovaTatiana KekeevaVladimir StrelnikovAlexander TanasAlexey Kalinkin
Institutions(3)
Research Centre For M…Murmansk Regional Onc…National Medical Rese…

Papers

Molecular Subgroups of HRD Positive Ovarian Cancer and Their Prognostic Significance

Homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) is involved in the development of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) and its elevated sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. To investigate the heterogeneity of the HRD-positive HGSOC we evaluated the HRD status, including BRCA mutations, genomic scar score, and methylation status of BRCA1/2 genes in 352 HGSOC specimens. We then divided the HRD-positive cohort into three molecular subgroups, the BRCA mutation cohort (BRCA+), BRCA1 methylation cohort (Meth+), and the rest of the HRD+ cohort (HRD+BRCA-Meth-), and evaluated their first-line chemotherapy response, benefit from olaparib, and progression-free survival (PFS). HRD-positive status was detected in 65% (228/352) of samples. The first group, BRCA+, accounted for 45% (102/228) of HRD positive cases and showed the best outcome in platinum therapy (ORR 96%), the highest olaparib benefit (p = 0.006) and the highest median PFS (46 months). The frequency of the second cohort, Meth+, among HRD-positive patients was 23% (52/228). Patients with Meth+ HGSOC showed a significantly poorer outcome, with a median PFS of 19 months, a significantly lower ORR to platinum therapy (84%) and a modest, but not significant, benefit from olaparib maintenance. The third HRD+BRCA-Meth- group accounted for 32% (74/228) of HRD-positive patients and showed an ORR to platinum therapy similar to that of the BRCA+ group (90%), a higher, but not statistically significant, benefit from olaparib and a median PFS of 23 months. In conclusion, Meth+ subgroup had poor outcomes in terms of chemotherapy response, olaparib benefit, and PFS compared to the other HRD+ subgroups, requiring a more thorough follow-up.

1Papers
6Collaborators