Dimitrios Tsolakidis

Sentinel SENECA risk factors for unsuccessful bi-lateral sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer

Our study aims to assess the risk factors associated with bi-lateral sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping failure in endometrial cancer. The SENECA study was a retrospective multi-center international observational study that reviewed data from 2139 women with clinical stage I-to-II endometrial cancer across 64 centers in 17 countries. Between January 2021 and December 2022, patients underwent surgical treatment with SLN assessment, following the guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology. Risk factors associated with the absence of bi-lateral mapping were analyzed using χ Among the 2139 patients, the bi-lateral lymph node detection rate was 82.7%, whereas the unilateral detection rate was 97.3%. In multi-variate analysis, 5 risk factors remained statistically associated with unsuccessful bi-lateral lymph node mapping: high-grade histology (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.79, p=.03), myometrial invasion >50% (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.75, p=.012), low-volume surgeon <20 cases/year (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.89, p<.01), open surgical approach (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.78 , p=.03), and non-indocyanine green tracer (OR 4.59, 95% CI 2.64 to 7.99, p<.01). The addition of bi-lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy to SLN biopsy caused an increased rate of intra-operative complications (2% vs 8.4%, p<.01) and all-grade post-operative complications (4.1% vs 11.2%, p<.01). Our study identifies 5 risk factors associated with unsuccessful lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer. Efforts should be made to perform this technique with indocyanine green, through minimally invasive surgery, and performed or supervised by an experienced surgeon with ≥20 endometrial cancer cases per year.

SUROVA study: global real-world treatment strategies and mortality risk prediction in advanced ovarian cancer

This study aimed to compare 5-year overall survival between primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery in patients with stage IIIB to IVB epithelial ovarian cancer, using global real-world data. Secondary objectives included evaluation of progression-free survival and the influence of race, post-operative complications, and residual disease. SUROVA is a retrospective, international cohort study involving patients treated between 2018 and 2019 across 174 centers in 55 countries. Patients underwent primary surgery or received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery, per institutional protocols. Propensity score matching was based on 7 baseline variables: age, race, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status at diagnosis, CA125 level at diagnosis, FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage IV disease, presence of ascites, and final tumor grade. Cox regression models with time-dependent effects and interaction terms were applied. A clinical risk calculator was developed and internally validated. A total of 3286 patients had a mean age of 60.0 years (SD 12); 2978 (90.6%) had high-grade serous carcinoma, and 795 (24.7%) presented with FIGO stage IV disease. A total of 1666 patients (50.7%) underwent primary cytoreductive surgery, and 1620 (49.3%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up duration was 43.8 months (interquartile range; 22.6-59.3). After propensity score matching (n=1524), overall survival was similar between groups (67.2 vs 65.0 months; HR 1.002, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.18, p=.98). Outcomes differed by ethnicity, residual disease, and post-operative complications. Post-operative complications (28%) significantly worsened survival (66 vs 46 months; HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.9, p<.001), especially among patients undergoing primary surgery (73 vs 46 months; HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.37, p<.001). The most favorable outcomes were observed among patients with primary surgery, complete resection, and no complications, with median overall survival not reached (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.40, p<.001). Although overall survival was similar between groups, treatment effects differed by ethnicity, residual disease, and complications. Post-operative complications were associated with significantly worse survival, particularly among patients undergoing primary surgery, while the best outcomes were achieved in those who had primary surgery with complete resection and no complications.