Dilek Yuksel

Spotlight on oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors of pure endometrioid ovarian carcinoma

To determine the prognostic factors related to recurrence and survival, and to evaluate the need for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with endometrioid type epithelial ovarian cancer (EEOC). This study included 63 EEOC patients who were surgically staged. The FIGO 2014 stage was stage I in 41 (65 %) patients, stage II in 8 (12.5 %) patients, stage III in 14 (22.5 %) patients. 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) was 78 % in the entire cohort. 15 (23.8 %) patients had disease failure. In univariate analysis, advanced stage (II&III), high grade tumor, presence of ascites, bilateral tumor, presence of omental metastasis, positive peritoneal cytology were prognostic factors for poor FFS. Only the stage was determined to be an independent prognostic factor for disease-failure. According to multivariate analysis, stage II&III was related to a statistically significant hazard ratio for a disease failure of 3.49 (95 % confidence interval: 1.029-11.841; p = 0.045). The effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy was assessed for 41 patients with stage I. Eleven (26.8 %) patients with stage I did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Whereas 5-year FFS was 88 % in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, that was 91 % in patients without adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.923). The independent prognostic factor for recurrence in EEOC was stage only. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not related to improvement in FFS in the early stage EEOC that were completely staged.

The prognostic factors in 384 patients with FIGO 2014 stage IB cervical cancer: What is the role of tumor size on prognosis?

To define the relationship of tumor size with surgico-pathological factors and oncological outcome in FIGO 2014 stage IB cervical cancer. This study retrospectively evaluated 384 FIGO 2014 Stage IB cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy. Tumor size was stratified according to 2 cm (≤ 2cm, 2-≤4 cm, >4 cm) and 4 cm (≤4 cm, >4 cm), and the relationship with poor prognostic factors, and the effects on survival were examined. The distribution of prognostic factors was compared between three subgroups: ≤2 cm vs. 2-≤4 cm; 2-≤4 cm vs. > 4 cm and ≤ 2 cm vs. > 4 cm. Survival rate was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional-hazards regression. Stratification of tumor size according to 4 cm was found to better determine pelvic lymph node determination. Parametrial involvement, uterine involvement and deep cervical stromal invasion were correlated with increasing tumor size. Lymph node involvement and uterine involvement were an independent prognostic risk factor for recurrence and cancer-specific survival. Tumor size showed no association with prognosis. There is no meaningful cut-off value for tumor size determining all surgico-pathological factors. There was also seen to be no association between tumor size and recurrence or disease-related mortality.

The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on oncological outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma with only intermediate-risk factors: a propensity score matching analysis

We aimed to evaluate whether adjuvant radiotherapy had a survival benefit for patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma with intermediate-risk factors. This study included patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy according to Wertheim-Okabayashi for stage IB1-IIA2 cervical carcinoma. Each patient had at least one intermediate-risk factor including tumour diameter ≥4 cm, deep stromal invasion, and positive lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Patients with lymph node metastasis, parametrial invasion, and positive surgical margins according to the final paraffin section were excluded. In total, 183 patients were included. Seventy-three (39.9%) patients had one, 85 (46.4%) had two, and 25 (13.7%) had three intermediate risk factors. Sixty-seven (36.6%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of stage, LVSI, and endometrial/uterine invasion between the groups that did and did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy (

Oncologic outcome in patients with 2018 FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: Is tumor size important?

AbstractBackgroundTo evaluate the prognostic factors and oncologic outcome in patients with 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB cervical cancer (CC) after radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy.Materials and MethodsThis study included 290 patients with type II or III radical hysterectomy + pelvic ± para‐aortic lymphadenectomy and 2018 FIGO stage IB1‐3 epithelial CC. Disease‐free survival (DFS) estimates were determinate by using the Kaplan–Meier method. Survival curves were compared using the log‐rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsThe mean age of study cohort was 52 ± 10.25 years. Five‐year DFS was 93% in entire cohort. On univariate analysis, surgical border involvement (p = 0.007), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (p = 0.040), uterine involvement (p = 0.040), and depth of cervical stromal invasion (p = 0.007) were found to have statistical significance for DFS. However, none of them were independent prognostic factors for the risk of recurrence. Tumor size according to 2018 FIGO staging criteria was not related with recurrence.ConclusionsSurgical border involvement, LVSI, depth of cervical stromal invasion, and uterine involvement were predictors for DFS on univariate analysis. Tumor size was not predicting to recurrence in patient with 2018 FIGO stage IB1‐3 CC.

Oncologic outcomes of patients with FIGO 2014 stage IB-IIA cervical adenocarcinoma who underwent radical surgery

To identify prognostic factors of early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma in patients with FIGO IB-IIA, who were treated with radical surgery. Clinical data of 64 patients with stage IB-IIA cervical adenocarcinoma who underwent radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy with or without adjuvant therapy between 1993 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathologic factors that affect the oncological outcomes were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for the assessment of survival outcomes. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. The 5-year recurrence-free survival and 5-year disease-specific survivals were 83% and 98%, respectively. Tumor size, stage of disease and uterine spread were significantly related prognostic factors for shorter recurrence-free survival. During the follow-up, nine (14.1%) patients recurred. Five of them were extrapelvic recurrence. No correlation was identified between histopathologic subtype and extrapelvic recurrence (p = 0.265). There was no difference between adjuvant only radiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy on recurrence-free survival in a univariate analysis adjusting for prognostic factors. It is important to determine the prognostic factors that predict disease outcome in surgically treated cervical adenocarcinoma for tailored adjuvant treatment. Tumor size, stage and uterine spread are determinant factors for recurrence. Risk stratifications, including uterine spread may especially be useful for patients with AC.

Assessment of the differences in oncologic outcomes between patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma and uterine serous carcinoma

AbstractAimTo evaluate whether the recurrence rates, recurrence patterns, and survival outcomes differed according to the primary site of the tumor in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) and uterine serous carcinoma (USC).MethodsThe population of this multicenter retrospective study consisted of patients who had USC or HGSOC. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and disease‐specific survival (DSS) estimates were determined using the Kaplan–Meier method. Survival curves were compared using the log‐rank test.ResultsThe study cohort consisted of 247 patients with HGSOC and 34 with USC. Recurrence developed in 118 (51.1%) in the HGSOC group and 14 (42.4%) in the USC group (p = 0.352). The median time to recurrence was 23.5 (range, 4–144) and 17 (range, 4–43) months in the HGSOC and USC groups, respectively (p = 0.055). The 3‐year PFS was 52% in the HGSOC group and 47% in the USC group (p = 0.450). Additionally, 3‐year DSS was 92% and 82% in the HGSOC and USC groups, respectively (p = 0.060).ConclusionsHGSOC and USC are aggressive tumors with high recurrence and mortality rates in advanced stages. These two carcinomas, which are similar in molecular features and clinical management, may also have similar recurrence patterns, disease failure, and survival rates.

Surgery for patients with endometrioid-type endometrial cancer: is lymphadenectomy above the inferior mesenteric artery necessary?

The primary objective of this study was to identify the risk of metastasis to lymph nodes above the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer (EC) and the factors that influence metastasis. The study included patients who had been operated on for endometrioid-type EC in three gynecological oncology centers between 2007 and 2023. The supramesenteric lymph node (SM-LN) is the region between the left renal vein and the IMA, whereas the inframesenteric lymph node (IM-LN) is the region between the IMA and the aortic bifurcation, as determined by the level of the IMA. The study sample comprised 412 patients. The median number of lymph nodes excised per patient was 58. The median count was 37 for pelvic lymph nodes, 21 for para-aortic lymph nodes, 8 for IM-LN, and 13 for SM-LN. In the univariate analysis, the factors that were found to be statistically significant in determining SM-LN metastasis included tumor size, depth of myometrial invasion, uterine serosal invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), cervical invasion, peritoneal cytology, adnexal metastasis, omental metastasis, non-nodal extrauterine metastasis, pelvic lymph node metastasis, and IM-LN metastasis. In the multivariate analysis, SM-LN metastasis was independently associated with tumor size, LVSI, pelvic lymph node metastasis, and IM-LN metastasis. In conclusion, in cases of intermediate-high risk EC, it is important to know that the disease spreads to SM-LN in 7.3% of patients. The efficacy of postoperative adjuvant treatment may be inadequate due to a lack of information regarding the SM-LN region.