Investigator

David Hardisson

Full Professor (Catedrático) · Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Department of Pathology

DHDavid Hardisson
Papers(7)
The Proteomic Landsca…One‐Step Nucleic Acid…The association betwe…Prognostic markers of…The Prognostic Signif…Comparison of Methods…MDM4 amplification as…
Collaborators(10)
Andrés RedondoAlberto Pelaez-GarciaIgnacio Ruz-CaracuelMarta MendiolaJosé PalaciosCarlos de AndreaAlvaro Lopez-JaneiroIrene Carretero‐BarrioRaluca AlexandruRodrigo Barderas
Institutions(6)
Hospital Universitari…Instituto de Salud Ca…Hospital Universitari…Hospital La Paz Insti…Department Of Medical…Clinica Universidad D…

Papers

One‐Step Nucleic Acid Amplification Analysis of Sentinel Lymphatic Nodes in Endometrial Cancer Patients ( EU ‐ OSNA ): A European Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study

ABSTRACT Objective This European multicenter study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of one‐step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) as the primary endpoint by comparing this method with ultrastaging for the detection of sentinel node metastases in endometrial cancer patients. Methods European multicenter prospective performance study including data from 10 centers across 5 European countries. Each node, upon removal of surrounding adipose tissue, was sliced in 2 mm thick sections and equally distributed between ultrastaging and OSNA. OSNA is based on cytokeratin‐19 detection, serving as a metastatic marker. Sensitivity, specificity, and concordance of OSNA versus ultrastaging were calculated at nodal and patient levels. Results Seven hundred forty‐three sentinel nodes from 366 patients were evaluated. Compared to ultrastaging, OSNA showed concordance, specificity, and sensitivity of 95%, 97.6%, and 41.2% at the nodal level and 93.2%, 96.2%, and 47.8% at the patient level, respectively. In reverse analysis, when compared to OSNA, the ultrastaging showed a sensitivity of 45.2% and 45.8% at the nodal and patient levels, respectively. Irrespective of the size of metastasis, both methods agreed in 14 positive and 692 negative nodes (95%). This resulted in 24 (6.56%) patients with a positive OSNA and 23 (6.28%) patients with a positive ultrastaging finding. The number of discordant nodes was 47 (6.33%), 40 (85.1%) of them were micrometastases. Benign epithelial inclusions occurred in 4 nodes (0.54%) and 4 patients (1.09%). Conclusion Compared with ultrastaging, OSNA showed high concordance and specificity, but sensitivity was low—similar to ultrastaging compared with OSNA as an index test in reverse analysis. The main limitation in comparing the two approaches by splitting the sentinel nodes was the tissue allocation bias. As reflected in the number of discordant cases, especially at the micrometastases level. The distribution of patients with node metastases was comparable between the two methods at both the nodal and patient levels. Trial Registration German Clinical Trial Register: Nr. DRKS00021520

The association between the tumor immune microenvironments and clinical outcome in low‐grade, early‐stage endometrial cancer patients

AbstractEndometrial tumors show substantial heterogeneity in their immune microenvironment. This heterogeneity could be used to improve the accuracy of current outcome prediction tools. We assessed the immune microenvironment of 235 patients diagnosed with low‐grade, early‐stage endometrial cancer. Multiplex quantitative immunofluorescence was carried out to measure CD8, CD68, FOXP3, PD‐1, and PD‐L1 markers, as well as cytokeratin (CK), on tissue microarrays. Clustering results revealed five robust immune response patterns, each associated with specific immune populations, cell phenotypes, and cell spatial clustering. Most samples (69%) belonged to the immune‐desert subtype, characterized by low immune cell densities. Tumor‐infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)‐rich samples (4%) displayed high CD8+ T‐cell infiltration, as well as a high percentage of CD8/PD‐1+ cells. Immune‐exclusion samples (19%) displayed the lowest CD8+ infiltration combined with high PD‐L1 expression levels in CK+ tumor cells. In addition, they demonstrated high tumor cell spatial clustering as well as increased spatial proximity of CD8+/PD‐1+ and CK/PD‐L1+ cells. FOXP3 and macrophage‐rich phenotypes (3% and 4% of total samples) displayed relatively high levels of FOXP3+ regulatory T‐cells and CD68+ macrophages, respectively. These phenotypes correlated with clinical outcomes, with immune‐exclusion tumors showing an association with tumor relapse. When compared with prediction models built using routine pathological variables, models optimized with immune variables showed increased outcome prediction capacity (AUC = 0.89 versus 0.78) and stratification potential. The improved prediction capacity was independent of mismatch repair protein status and adjuvant radiotherapy treatment. Further, immunofluorescence results could be partially recapitulated using single‐marker immunohistochemistry (IHC) performed on whole tissue sections. TIL‐rich tumors demonstrated increased CD8+ T‐cells by IHC, while immune‐exclusion tumors displayed a lack of CD8+ T‐cells and frequent expression of PD‐L1 in tumor cells. Our results demonstrate the capability of the immune microenvironment to improve standard prediction tools in low‐grade, early‐stage endometrial carcinomas. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Prognostic markers of inflammation in endometrioid and clear cell ovarian cancer

Cancer-related systemic inflammation has been associated with prognosis in multiple cancer types. Conversely, local inflammation, which is characterized by dense intratumoral immune infiltrates, is a favorable predictor of survival outcome. However, these survival associations are not well established in ovarian cancer, particularly in the less frequent endometrioid and clear cell endometriosis associated histotypes. This retrospective study included 119 patients (63 endometrioid and 56 clear cell ovarian carcinomas). We performed a comprehensive survival association analysis of both systemic (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio or presence of endometriosis) and local inflammation markers (CD3+ and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes) using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models that account for confounding factors. Medium to high levels of intraepithelial CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with longer survival in endometrioid ovarian cancer (p=0.04). In addition, we found that intraepithelial CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are prognostic in clear cell ovarian cancer (p=0.02), and that intraepithelial CD3+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are also associated with improved outcome (p=0.02). Furthermore, intratumoral CD3+ and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes showed improved prognosis in the endometrioid subtype (p<0.1). No prognostic value was observed for systemic immune markers. In this study, patients with endometrioid and clear cell ovarian cancer with moderate to high CD8+ and CD3+ intraepithelial tumor infiltrating lymphocytes had longer overall survival. Higher expression of intratumoral CD3+ and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes also showed an improved outcome in endometrioid ovarian cancer. In contrast, systemic inflammation, evaluated by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio or presence of endometriosis, did not have a prognostic impact in these histologic subtypes.

The Prognostic Significance of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes, PD-L1, BRCA Mutation Status and Tumor Mutational Burden in Early-Stage High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma—A Study by the Spanish Group for Ovarian Cancer Research (GEICO)

Early stages are under-represented in studies on the molecular and immune features of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), and specific studies focused on early-stage HGSOC are required for a better prognostic stratification and to personalize chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of CD8+ and CD4+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumoral cell PD-L1 expression, BRCA mutational status and tumor mutation burden (TMB) in early-stage HGSOC. A retrospective study was performed on stage I and II HGSOC from the Molecular Reclassification of Early Stages of Ovarian Cancer (RECLAMO) cohort from the Spanish Group of Ovarian Cancer Research (GEICO). Centralized histological typing was performed based on morphological and immunohistochemical features. Intraepithelial (i) and stromal (s) CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and PD-L1 were evaluated on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and TMB were analyzed in tumor DNA using next-generation sequencing. The study included 124 tumors. High iCD8+ (&gt;20 TILs/core), low/intermediate CD4+ (&lt;20 TILs/core) and high CD8+/CD4+ ratio (&gt;35/core) were associated with favorable outcomes. Tumor cell PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 1) was present in only 8% of tumors. In total, 11 (16%) and 6 (9%) out of 69 HGSOC tested carried pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, respectively. Median TMB of 40 tumors analyzed was 5.04 mutations/Mb and only 6 tumors had 10 or more mutations/Mb. BRCA status and TMB were not associated with TILs or prognosis. When compared with studies on advanced HGSOC, our results suggested that prognostic variables differed according to stage and that more studies focused on early stages of HGSOC are needed to better stratify these tumors.

MDM4 amplification as a potential predictor of risk of recurrence in early-stage low-grade endometrial carcinoma

This study aimed to assess the frequency of MDM4 amplification in endometrial carcinomas and its association with clinicopathological features, particularly relapse risk in early-stage low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. We conducted a case-control study including 110 stage I to II low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (39 relapsing and 71 non-relapsing tumors) and an additional cohort of 82 high-grade endometrial carcinomas. An independent retrospective cohort of 194 early-stage low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinomas was used to validate the results. MDM4 amplification was analyzed by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Gene expression of MDM4 and GADD45A was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Immunohistochemistry assessed hormone receptor status, p53, and mismatch repair proteins. POLE and CTNNB1 mutations were evaluated by Sanger sequencing. MDM4 amplification was detected in 31 of 186 tumors (16.7%): 14 of 104 low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (13.5%) and 17 of 82 high-grade endometrial carcinomas (20.7%). Among low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinomas, amplification was significantly more frequent in relapsing tumors (11/38, 28.9%) than in non-relapsing ones (3/66, 4.5%) (p <.01). Concordant MDM4 amplification status was observed between biopsies and hysterectomy samples. In some relapsing cases, amplification emerged during disease progression. Multi-variable Cox regression identified MDM4 amplification as an independent predictor of relapse, alongside lymphovascular space invasion, tumor necrosis, and myometrial invasion. In the independent cohort, MDM4 amplification was associated with progression-free survival. Our study suggested that MDM4 amplification is a potential predictor of the risk of recurrence in early-stage low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinoma that can be easily evaluated in endometrial samples.

144Works
7Papers
29Collaborators

Positions

2020–

Full Professor (Catedrático)

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid · Department of Pathology

2014–

Head of Department

Hospital Universitario La Paz · Pathology

2009–

Head of Department

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Facultad de Medicina · Pathology

2008–

Associate Professor (Profesor titular)

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Facultad de Medicina · Pathology

2001–

Assistant Professor (Profesor asociado)

Universidad Autonoma de Madrid-School of Medicine · Pathology

Education

1990

Licenciado en Medicina y Cirugía

Universidad de Oviedo

1990

Medicina

Medizinische Fakultät der RWTH Aachen · Becario Programa ERASMUS

1990

Medicina

University of Edinburgh · Pathology, Visiting student)

Country

ES

Keywords
Pathology