Investigator

Daniele Neola

University Of Naples Federico Ii

DNDaniele Neola
Papers(4)
Integrated histologic…Survival and perioper…Minimally invasive su…Impact of optimal sec…
Collaborators(10)
Martina ArcieriGiuseppe VizzielliGiulia PellecchiaAntonio RaffoneDiego RaimondoSara PregnolatoStefano RestainoAntonio TravaglinoGiovanni ScambiaLorenza Driul
Institutions(6)
University Of Naples …University Of PisaIRCCS Azienda Ospedal…University of InsubriaFondazione Policlinic…University of Udine

Papers

Integrated histological parameters define prognostically relevant groups in atypical endometrial hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia

To assess the risk of endometrial carcinoma following a diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia by endometrial biopsy, stratified based on integrated histological parameters. All women with atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing hysterectomy within 1 year of diagnosis without progestin treatment were included. Patients were subdivided into three study groups, based on two criteria: (a) grade of nuclear atypia and (b) foci (<2 mm) of confluent glands with no intervening stroma: low-grade, high-grade, and confluent glands. The rate of endometrial carcinoma on the subsequent hysterectomy was assessed in each study group, and differences between study groups were assessed using Fisher's exact test, with a significant p value <0.05. Reproducibility was assessed by using Cohen's κ. Ninety-six patients were included. Overall, 36 of 96 patients (37.5%) had endometrial carcinoma on the subsequent hysterectomy. The number of endometrial carcinomas was 4 of 42 (9.5%) in the low-grade group, 14 of 28 (50.0%) in the high-grade group, and 18 of 26 (69.2%) in the confluent glands group. The rate of endometrial carcinoma was significantly higher in the high-grade group than in the low-grade group (p<0.001), whereas it did not significantly differ between the high-grade group and the confluent glands group (p=0.176). The reproducibility among pathologists was moderate for low-grade versus high-grade (κ=0.58) and substantial for confluent glands versus low-grade (κ=0.63) and high-grade (κ=0.63). Atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia can be stratified into prognostically relevant groups based on integrated histological parameters, with a possible major impact on patient management.

Survival and perioperative outcomes of pelvic exenteration in primary advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To assess survival and perioperative complications and mortality of pelvic exenteration (PE) in recurrent and advanced endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients. A systematic review and a meta-analysis was performed searching 7 electronic databases from their inception to May 2024 for all peer-reviewed studies that reported as a study outcome at least the 5 years-overall survival (OS) of PE in recurrent and/or advanced EC patients. Our outcomes were 5 year-OS from PE as primary outcome, and all extractable outcomes about PE survival [overall OS, 5 year- and overall disease specific survival (DSS), 5 year- and overall progression free survival (PFS)] and perioperative mortality and complications. Rates of survival outcomes and perioperative mortality and complications were calculated as individual and pooled estimates, with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses were planned for all study outcomes based on recurrent or advanced EC, separately. 6 studies with 166 patients were included. In women underwent PE for advanced or recurrent EC, pooled rate was: 41.7 % (95 % CI: 25.6-57.8 %) for 5 year-OS; 30.4 % (95 % CI: 14.9-45.8 %) for 5 year-DSS; 26.6 % (95 % CI: 10.6-42.5 %) for overall DSS; 51.8 % (95 % CI: 25.6-78.0 %) for 5 year-PFS; 9.7 % (95 % CI: 5.7-16.1 %) for perioperative mortality; 56.1 % (95 % CI: 32.3-76.4 %) for perioperative complications. Subgroup analyses were suitable exclusively in the "recurrent EC" subgroup and showed even worsened outcomes. In women with advanced or recurrent EC, PE shows not encouraging survival outcomes, with relatively high rates of perioperative mortality and complications. These outcomes further worsened in the subgroup of only recurrent EC. However, they should be confirmed by more updated studies.

Minimally invasive surgical treatment of recurrent endometrial carcinoma: A systematic review

Abstract Background While the role minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is established for primary endometrial carcinoma (EC), its feasibility in recurrent cases remains underexplored. Objective To systematically review the literature about MIS for EC recurrence. Search Strategy A systematic literature search was conducted across six electronic databases, targeting studies published until October 31, 2024. Selection Criteria Inclusion criteria encompassed all peer‐reviewed studies reporting MIS for recurrent EC. Data Collection and Analysis Data extraction focused on surgical outcomes and survival metrics, following PRISMA guidelines. Main Results Out of 9652 results, 15 studies with 17 cases of patients with EC recurrence met the inclusion criteria. All patients underwent successful MIS, with no intraoperative complications reported. Complete resection (when reported) was achieved in 100% of cases, and adjuvant treatment was administered in 64.7% of patients. The mean follow‐up duration was 23.6 months, with a disease‐free survival rate of 63.6%. Risk of bias assessment indicated a predominance of low to medium risk of bias within studies. Conclusion MIS might be feasible and safe in cases of abdominal recurrence of EC when the number of recurrence localizations is less than three. MIS might be a management option independently from EC histology, grade and stage (except for stage IV), previous adjuvant therapy and group of risk. The endoscopic approach could be both laparoscopic and robotic, without any apparent difference in terms of feasibility, safety and survival outcomes. However, data on this topic are limited and our findings need to be confirmed by additional studies.

Impact of optimal secondary cytoreductive surgery on survival outcomes in women with recurrent endometrial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

AbstractBackgroundManagement of recurrent endometrial carcinoma (EC) represents a challenge. Although a complete resection of visible disease at secondary surgery (R0) is recommended, the impact of R0 on survival outcomes is unclear and pooled data are lacking.ObjectiveTo quantitatively assess the impact of R0 on survival outcomes in women with EC recurrence.Search StrategyA systematic review and meta‐analysis was performed searching eight electronic databases from their inception up to January 2024.Selection CriteriaAll peer‐reviewed studies that assessed quantitatively the impact of R0 on survival outcomes in women at first EC recurrence were included.Data Collection and AnalysisHazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for death of any cause and secondary recurrent or progressive disease in women with EC recurrence who underwent R0 compared to non‐optimal secondary surgical cytoreduction (R1) were pooled and assessed at both univariable and multivariable analyses.Main ResultsThree studies with 442 patients were included. At univariate analysis, in women with EC recurrence and R0 compared to women with EC recurrence and R1, pooled HR was 0.451 (95% CI: 0.319–0.638) for death from any cause, and 0.517 (95% CI: 0.298–0.895; p = 0.019) for recurrent or progressive disease.At multivariate analysis, in women with EC recurrence and R0 compared to women with EC recurrence and R1, pooled HR was 0.447 (95% CI: 0.255–0.783; p = 0.005) for death from any cause, and 0.585 (95% CI: 0.359–0.952; p = 0.031) for recurrent or progressive disease.ConclusionIn women with EC recurrence, R0 is an independent prognostic factor, decreasing the risk of death from any cause by approximatively 55%, and of recurrent or progressive disease by approximatively 40%, compared to R1.

4Papers
12Collaborators