Investigator
Heidelberg University
CG>TG mutation frequency as negative predictor of homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian and breast cancer
Abstract Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is a predictive biomarker for PARP inhibition and platinum-based chemotherapy. While copy number alteration-based scores such as HRDsum = LST + TAI + LOH are included in therapy approvals, single base substitutions (SBS) are underinvestigated as predictors of HRD. WES data of the TCGA pan-cancer cohort and an in-house ovarian cancer cohort were annotated by alterations in BRCA1/2 and additional genes causative of HRD. Using this reference, the new biomarker fdeam defined as frequency of C > T transitions at CpG sites in relation to all SBS and HRDsum were compared for the detection of HRD. In the TCGA ovarian cancer, the in-house, and the TCGA breast cancer cohorts, fdeam performed non-inferior to HRDsum (AUC = 0.84, AUC = 0.85, and AUC = 0.88). The cutpoint fdeam = 13.1% maximized the balanced accuracy in the TCGA ovarian cancer cohort and resulted in sensitivity = 89% and specificity = 77% in the in-house cohort. In a simulation study, fdeam retained high sensitivity for HRD detection and outperformed HRDsum in tumors of purity 40%, 20%, and 10%. Overcoming the limited robustness against low tumor purity, the new biomarker can contribute to a more sensitive detection of HRD in clinical samples. Further studies are warranted to confirm its clinical validity and utility and explore its potential for liquid biopsies.
Homologous recombination deficiency is inversely correlated with microsatellite instability and identifies immunologically cold tumors in most cancer types
AbstractHomologous recombination deficiency (HRD) leads to DNA double‐strand breaks and can be exploited by the use of poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors to induce synthetic lethality. Extending the original therapeutic concept, the role of HRD is currently being investigated in clinical trials testing immune checkpoint blockers alone or in combination with PARP inhibitors, but the relationship between HRD and immune cell context in cancer is incompletely understood. We analyzed the association between immune cell composition, gene expression, and HRD in 9,041 tumors of 32 solid cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The numbers of genomic scars were quantified by the HRD sum score (HRDsum) including loss of heterozygosity, large‐scale state transitions, and telomeric allelic imbalance. The T‐cell inflamed gene expression profile correlated weakly, but significantly positively, with HRDsum across cancer types (ρ = 0.17). Within individual cancer types, a significantly positive correlation was observed only in breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and four other cancer types, but not in the remaining 26 cancer types. HRDsum and tumor mutational burden (TMB) correlated significantly positively across cancer types (ρ = 0.42) and within 18 cancer types. HRDsum and a proliferation metagene correlated significantly positively across cancer types (ρ = 0.52) and within 20 cancer types. Mismatch repair deficiency and HRD as well as proofreading deficiency showed a high level of exclusivity. High HRD scores were associated with an immunologically activated tumor microenvironment only in a minority of cancer types. Our data favor the combination of genetic markers, complex genomic markers (including HRDsum and TMB), and other molecular markers (including proliferation scores) for a precise and comprehensive read‐out of the tumor biology and an individually tailored treatment.
High Concordance of Different Assays in the Determination of Homologous Recombination Deficiency–Associated Genomic Instability in Ovarian Cancer
PURPOSE Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have shown promising clinical results in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Analysis of biomarker subgroups consistently revealed higher benefits for patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). The test that is most often used for the detection of HRD in clinical studies is the Myriad myChoice assay. However, other assays can also be used to assess biomarkers, which are indicative of HRD, genomic instability (GI), and BRCA1/ 2 mutation status. Many of these assays have high potential to be broadly applied in clinical routine diagnostics in a time-effective decentralized manner. Here, we compare the performance of a multitude of alternative assays in comparison with Myriad myChoice in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). METHODS DNA from HGSOC samples was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of cases previously run with the Myriad myChoice assay, and GI was measured by multiple molecular assays (CytoSNP, AmoyDx, Illumina TSO500 HRD, OncoScan, NOGGO GISv1, QIAseq HRD Panel and whole genome sequencing), applying different bioinformatics algorithms. RESULTS Application of different assays to assess GI, including Myriad myChoice, revealed high concordance of the generated scores ranging from very substantial to nearly perfect fit, depending on the assay and bioinformatics pipelines applied. Interlaboratory comparison of assays also showed high concordance of GI scores. CONCLUSION Assays for GI assessment not only show a high concordance with each other but also in correlation with Myriad myChoice. Thus, almost all of the assays included here can be used effectively to assess HRD-associated GI in the clinical setting. This is important as PARPi treatment on the basis of these tests is compliant with European Medicines Agency approvals, which are methodologically not test-bound.
Researcher