Damiano Cirri

Chemical Modification of Auranofin Yields a New Family of Anticancer Drug Candidates: The Gold(I) Phosphite Analogues

A panel of four novel gold(I) complexes, inspired by the clinically established gold drug auranofin (1-Thio-β-D-glucopyranosatotriethylphosphine gold-2,3,4,6-tetraacetate), was prepared and characterized. All these compounds feature the replacement of the triethylphosphine ligand of the parent compound auranofin with a trimethylphosphite ligand. The linear coordination around the gold(I) center is completed by Cl−, Br−, I− or by the thioglucose tetraacetate ligand (SAtg). The in-solution behavior of these gold compounds as well as their interactions with some representative model proteins were comparatively analyzed through 31PNMR and ESI-MS measurements. Notably, all panel compounds turned out to be stable in aqueous media, but significant differences with respect to auranofin were disclosed in their interactions with a few leading proteins. In addition, the cytotoxic effects produced by the panel compounds toward A2780, A2780R and SKOV-3 ovarian cancer cells were quantitated and found to be in the low micromolar range, since the IC50 of all compounds was found to be between 1 μM and 10 μM. Notably, these novel gold complexes showed large and similar inhibition capabilities towards the key enzyme thioredoxin reductase, again comparable to those of auranofin. The implications of these results for the discovery of new and effective gold-based anticancer agents are discussed.

Structure-activity relationships in a series of auranofin analogues showing remarkable antiproliferative properties

The antiproliferative properties of a series of structurally-related gold(I) and silver(I) linear complexes inspired to the clinically established gold-based drug auranofin were investigated in A2780 ovarian cancer cells and in their auranofin (A2780/AF-R) and cisplatin (A2780/CDDP-R) resistant counterparts. In A2780 cells and in the cisplatin-resistant subline, gold-based analogues manifested a cytotoxicity profile comparable or superior to auranofin, while the silver-based analogues were less active; both gold and silver complexes overcame cisplatin resistance. Yet, a high degree of cross resistance toward gold analogues was noticed in A2780/AF-R cells. In the same cell line cross-resistance for silver analogues was also observed, though lower. All metal complexes were scrutinized for their ability to inhibit thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), the putative primary target for auranofin: overall, gold compounds were more potent TrxR inhibitors than the corresponding silver compounds, probably, as the consequence of the stronger binding of gold to the active site selenocysteine residue. These results highlight that the thiosugar ligand of auranofin is not essential for cytotoxicity while the nature of the metal center (gold/silver) plays a relevant role in its modulation. In addition, a rather clear correlation was found between cytotoxic potency of tested compounds and their ability to inhibit TrxR activity, being gold compounds more effective than silver analogues. However, the residual TrxR activity, measured in A2780 cells treated with the half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of various metal complexes, resulted far higher than expected. These results suggest that additional cytotoxic mechanisms must be operative. The implications of these results are discussed.

Synthesis, chemical characterization, and biological evaluation of a novel auranofin derivative as an anticancer agent

A novel auranofin-inspired compound showed good antiproliferative properties, associated with lower lipophilicity and a faster reactivity, which make this complex have significant pharmaceutical and therapeutic advantages over auranofin itself.