Dae Gy Hong

Is ovarian cystectomy for atypical ovarian endometrioma safe?: A single center study

Ovarian atypical endometriosis (AE) is a premalignant lesion, and its potential to progress to endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer emphasizes its significance. However, the true risk of malignancy in AE remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of ovarian AE after ovarian cystectomy. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and histopathological reports of 41 patients who had been diagnosed with ovarian AE between January 2011 and April 2020. We reviewed age, obstetric history, age at menarche, preoperative CA 125 level, C-reactive protein level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, endometriosis stage, mean follow-up duration, postoperative hormonal therapy, and prognosis, including recurrence of endometriosis and malignant transformation. Among 41 patients with pathologically diagnosed ovarian AE, 26 were followed up after cystectomy only. The average follow-up period was 58.27 ± 33.22 months in cystectomy only patients. The mean age of the patients with cystectomy only versus that of patients with endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinoma was 32.73 ± 6.10 versus 48.29 ± 4.35 (P < .01) years. The preoperative CA 125 level was 115.63 ± 219.06 versus 225.75 ± 163.39 (P < .051) U/mL. Patients with endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinoma or other diseases and those who underwent oophorectomy were excluded. After surgery, hormone therapy was administered to 22 of 26 patients, and the remaining 4 patients were followed up without additional treatment. Endometriosis recurrence occurred in 5 patients, 1 of whom underwent second-line laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. However, no malignant transformations were observed. Ovarian AE has a low possibility of malignant transformation. Conservative treatment is recommended after appropriate ovarian cystectomy, such as enucleation.

Does protracted chemotherapy have an influence on the clinical outcomes in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer?

In epithelial ovarian cancer, first-line adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary, and patients sometimes require protraction; however, there are only a few recent studies to show its influence. In this study, we investigated whether the protraction of the total period of first-line chemotherapy has a negative influence on the survival outcomes. Of the 101 patients we recruited from February 2011 to February 2021, 70 (69.3%) and 31 (30.7%) were classified into the not protracted and protracted groups, respectively. They underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer. Protraction was defined as the overall duration of the first-line chemotherapy being more than 20 days longer than intended. Number of patients who underwent additional treatments such as bevacizumab or poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase inhibitors or pembrolizumab was compared between both groups. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis were used for survival outcomes. There was no significant difference for additional treatments. The progression-free survival (PFS) in the total follow-up period in the protracted group was significantly shorter than that in the not protracted group (P = .037); however, the difference in the overall survival between the 2 groups was not significant (P = .223). For the PFS, the hazard ratio of protraction was 1.646 in the univariate analysis (95% confidence interval, 1.020–2.658; P = .041). Excessive protraction of chemotherapy over 20 days or more can result in significantly shorter PFS within 5 years. A better therapeutic strategy is required for patients requiring protracted first-line chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Perioperative outcomes in patients with very low‐risk endometrial cancer undergoing surgery without lymph node dissection: Results from KGOG 2021

AbstractAimTo evaluate the perioperative outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer meeting the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) criteria who underwent surgery without lymph node dissection.MethodsThis study included 153 patients who met the KGOG criteria: (1) endometrioid histology, (2) myometrial invasion <50%, (3) tumor confined to the corpus, (4) no lymph node >1 cm, and (5) serum CA125 ≤ 35 U/mL. The patients underwent surgery without lymph node dissection at 11 hospitals in Korea between February 2020 and May 2024. Perioperative outcomes were collected prospectively.ResultsAmong the 153 patients, 89 (58%) underwent surgery without lymph node removal, while 64 (42%) underwent surgery with lymph node removal. Minimally invasive surgery was performed in >90% of cases, with a conversion rate to laparotomy of 1%. The mean surgery time was 109.37 ± 37.67 min. Estimated blood loss was minimal (93.74 ± 93.13 mL), with a mean hemoglobin drop of 1.32 ± 1.01 g/dL. Transfusions were required in only three patients (2%). Postoperative hospital stays exceeded 2 days in 51% of cases. Lymph node metastasis was observed in just one case (1%). Adverse events included 52 grade 1 and 2 grade 2 events (e.g., headache, paresthesia). Patients undergoing lymph node removal (primarily sentinel lymph node biopsy) had significantly longer surgery times and postoperative hospital stays compared to those without lymph node removal.ConclusionSurgery without lymph node dissection demonstrated excellent perioperative outcomes and minimal adverse events in patients meeting KGOG criteria.

Therapeutic effects of surgical debulking of metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancer IIICr: a trial protocol for a phase III, multicenter, randomized controlled study (KGOG1047/DEBULK trial)

Bulky or multiple lymph node (LN) metastases are associated with poor prognosis in cervical cancer, and the size or number of LN metastases is not yet reflected in the staging system and therapeutic strategy. Although the therapeutic effects of surgical resection of bulky LNs before standard treatment have been reported in several retrospective studies, well-planned randomized clinical studies are lacking. Therefore, the aim of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) 1047/DEBULK trial is to investigate whether the debulking surgery of bulky or multiple LNs prior to concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) improves the survival rate of patients with cervical cancer IIICr diagnosed by imaging tests. The KGOG 1047/DEBULK trial is a phase III, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving patients with bulky or multiple LN metastases in cervical cancer IIICr. This study will include patients with a short-axis diameter of a pelvic or para-aortic LN ≥2 cm or ≥3 LNs with a short-axis diameter ≥1 cm and for whom CCRT is planned. The treatment arms will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either receive CCRT (control arm) or undergo surgical debulking of bulky or multiple LNs before CCRT (experimental arm). CCRT consists of extended-field external beam radiotherapy/pelvic radiotherapy, brachytherapy and LN boost, and weekly chemotherapy with cisplatin (40 mg/m²), 4-6 times administered intravenously. The primary endpoint will be 3-year progression-free survival rate. The secondary endpoints will be 3-year overall survival rate, treatment-related complications, and accuracy of radiological diagnosis of bulky or multiple LNs. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05421650; Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007137.