Investigator
St Johns School
Bevacizumab-induced dysphonia: A case report with brief review of literature
Introduction Anti-angiogenic treatment in adjunct with chemotherapy is widely used for the treatment of various cancers. These agents inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling thereby inhibiting tumor proliferation and invasion. Dysphonia, or voice changes, has been documented, but is an underreported side effect of anti-angiogenic agents. We report a case of intermittent dysphonia in a patient with metastatic, platinum-refractory ovarian cancer treated with bevacizumab. Case report A 48-year-old female with high grade mixed type ovarian adenocarcinoma and concurrent left sided breast cancer was transitioned to palliative therapy with gemcitabine-bevacizumab for her ovarian cancer. At a follow-up visit after three cycles of the new therapy, the patient complained of intermittent changes in her voice, describing periods of hoarseness or softness in her voice after the chemotherapy—sometimes to the point that her voice was inaudible. Management and outcome: A new pelvic thrombus was discovered upon assessment of the patient’s disease. Bevacizumab was held and she was referred to ear, nose, and throat evaluation for dysphonia. Laryngoscopic examination showed normal vocal cord, with normal movements and no lesion or necrosis. During subsequent follow-up, the patient reported improvement in her voice with no additional dysphonia. Discussion Vocal adverse effects of anti-VEGF agents have been documented in landmark trials and case reports; however, clinicians are often unaware of this rare side effect. Although VEGF-induced dysphonia may be rare and may not impede the patient’s quality of life in some cases, it is critical to acknowledge and not underestimate this adverse effect.
A Real World Perspective of PARP Inhibitor Use in Gynecological Cancer Patients
Introduction: Over the last few years, targeted therapy has become the mainstay maintenance treatment of patients with ovarian cancer including patients with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. Poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are effective in the treatment of patients who are in complete or partial remission. PARPi are known to cause hematological adverse events (AEs), but have not been compared directly to each other. Objective: Primary objective was to compare the incidence of hematological and non-hematological AEs associated with the use of PARPi. Methods: This was a single institution, retrospective study evaluating patients who were treated with PARPi for ovarian cancer from January 2017 to October 2020. Patients were stratified according to which PARP inhibitor they received. Results: Ninety-two patients were included in final analysis. Thirty-one (33.7%) patients received niraparib and 61 (66.3%) patients received olaparib. Median age of patients were 64.3 (range, 33.8 to 92.3) years, 66 (71.7%) were white, and 84 (91.3%) had an ECOG PS of 0/1. Patients in the niraparib group experienced a higher rate of hematologic AEs, with 11 (35.5%), 20 (64.5%), and 18 (58.1%) experiencing neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Eight (13.1%), 24 (39.3%), and 16 (26.2%) patients in the olaparib group experienced neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Conclusion: This single institution retrospective study outlines the hematological toxicities observed between two PARPi. Our results suggested that niraparib tended to be associated with a higher risk for hematologic toxicities than olaparib. Anemia was the most common hematologic toxicity which was consistent with what has been widely documented in the literature.
