Christine Chow

p53 Immunohistochemical patterns in HPV-related neoplasms of the female lower genital tract can be mistaken for TP53 null or missense mutational patterns

We have recently encountered p53 immunohistochemical (IHC) patterns in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated carcinomas of the gynecologic tract, which were confused with absent (null) or overexpression TP53 mutational staining. We therefore evaluated p53 and p16 IHC in 25 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) (16 vulva, 4 Bartholin's gland, and 5 cervix), 20 endocervical adenocarcinomas (EDAC), 14 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), 2 adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), all of which exhibited morphologic features of HPV. Only cases showing diffuse/strong block-like p16 staining were included for further study. All EDACs underwent TP53 sequencing and HPV in situ hybridization (ISH) was performed in selected cases. p53 IHC staining fell into two main patterns. The most common was designated as "markedly reduced (null-like)" (absence or significantly attenuated staining in >70% of cells), which could be confused with true null mutational pattern. This was present in 14/25 (56%) SCCs, 7/14 (50%) HSILs, and 18/20 (90%) EDACs. The second notable pattern was "mid-epithelial (basal sparing)" (distinct absence of staining in basal cells juxtaposed with strong staining in parabasal cells), seen in 10/25 (40%) SCC, 7/14 (50%) HSIL, and none of the EDACs. There was scattered weak to moderate p53 staining (conventional wild type) in 1/25 (4%) SCC and 2/20 (10%) EDAC. No cases showed strong/diffuse overexpression. One EDAC had a TP53 missense mutation and exhibited "markedly reduced (null-like)" staining. HPV ISH revealed an inverse relationship with p53, cells positive for HPV mRNA were negative for p53. Knowledge of these patterns can help pathologists avoid misinterpreting p53 status in the setting of HPVA cancers.

Major p53 immunohistochemical patterns in in situ and invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the vulva and correlation with TP53 mutation status

The recent literature has shown that vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) can be stratified into two prognostically relevant groups based on human papillomavirus (HPV) status. The prognostic value of p53 for further sub-stratification, particularly in the HPV-independent group, has not been agreed upon. This disagreement is likely due to tremendous variations in p53 immunohistochemical (IHC) interpretation. To address this problem, we sought to compare p53 IHC patterns with TP53 mutation status. We studied 61 VSCC (48 conventional VSCC, 2 VSCC with sarcomatoid features, and 11 verrucous carcinomas) and 42 in situ lesions (30 differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia [dVIN], 9 differentiated exophytic vulvar intraepithelial lesions [deVIL], and 3 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or usual vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia [HSIL/uVIN]). IHC for p16 and p53, and sequencing of TP53 exons 4-9 were performed. HPV in situ hybridization (ISH) was performed in selected cases. We identified six major p53 IHC patterns, two wild-type patterns: (1) scattered, (2) mid-epithelial expression (with basal sparing), and four mutant patterns: (3) basal overexpression, (4) parabasal/diffuse overexpression, (5) absent, and (6) cytoplasmic expression. These IHC patterns were consistent with TP53 mutation status in 58/61 (95%) VSCC and 39/42 (93%) in situ lesions. Cases that exhibited strong scattered staining and those with a weak basal overexpression pattern could be easily confused. The mid-epithelial pattern was exclusively observed in p16-positive lesions; the basal and parabasal layers that had absent p53 staining, appeared to correlate with the cells that were positive for HPV-ISH. This study describes a pattern-based p53 IHC interpretation framework, which can be utilized as a surrogate marker for TP53 mutational status in both VSCC and vulvar in situ lesions.

Proteomic analysis uncovers biological diversity in molecularly defined endometrial carcinomas

While endometrial cancer has an overall favorable prognosis, some patients have poor outcomes and may benefit from further refinements of the current classification systems. Molecular classification stratifies endometrial cancer patients into four prognostic subtypes: POLEmut, MMRd (mismatch repair deficient), p53abn, and NSMP (no specific molecular profile), where patients with POLEmut have the best prognosis and p53abn has the worst prognosis. We used proteomic profiling to assess if additional prognostic or predictive information could be identified across or within molecular subtypes. Global proteome profiling of formalin fixed, paraffin embedded samples, that had clinicopathologic and outcome data, was performed on 184 endometrial cancers encompassing all four molecular subtypes, including replicate samples of the same tumor, and both biopsy and final hysterectomy specimens. To ensure representation of each subtype, we profiled an approximately equal distribution in the 148 unique tumors; 34 (23%) POLEmut, 40 (27%) MMRd, 35 (24%) p53abn and 39 (26%) NSMP, rather than the population-based distributions. There was high reproducibility in the proteomic profiles of intra-tumor replicate samples, and between matched biopsy and hysterectomy tumor samples. Consensus clustering identified four clusters with different prognosis, named 'Adhesion', 'Immune', 'Proliferation', and 'Metabolic' based on the functional characteristics of the enriched proteins. We associated protein expression features with common mutations, molecular subtype, and outcomes. These results demonstrate the biologic diversity within endometrial cancers, both between and within molecular subtypes, and provide candidate features for functional and clinical investigation.