Investigator

Christa Aubrey

University Of Alberta

CAChrista Aubrey
Papers(2)
Mode of Minimally Inv…Safety of vaginal sur…
Collaborators(9)
Gregg NelsonGregory R. PondJanice KwonJeanelle SabourinLaurence BernardLaurie ElitLimor HelpmanTerry KaraAlon D. Altman
Institutions(8)
University Of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary…McMaster UniversityUniversity Of British…McGill University Hea…Juravinski Cancer Cen…Sheba Medical CenterUniversity of Manitoba

Papers

Mode of Minimally Invasive Surgery Associated with Venous Thromboembolism Incidence in Gynecologic Cancer Patients

Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gynecologic malignancy is uncommon. Our objective was to characterize the rates and identify risk factors of postoperative VTE. A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing MIS for gynecologic malignancy at three Canadian institutions from 2014 to 2020 was performed. The primary outcome was incidence of VTE within 90 days post-operatively. Descriptive statistics were used for clinicopathologic factors, and univariate analysis compared differences between groups. Rate and 95% confidence interval for VTE per 1000 surgeries were calculated. A total of 1786 patients met inclusion criteria, 85.3% uterine, 11.5% cervical, and 2.3% had ovarian cancer. Modes of surgery included robotic (49.4%), laparoscopic (20.7%), or combined laparoscopic/vaginal (29.9%). There were 15 VTE events at 90 days post-operatively (0.84%). Rates of VTE were lowest in patients who underwent robotic surgery, followed by combined laparoscopic/vaginal, and highest in a laparoscopic approach (p = 0.047). Pelvic lymphadenectomy (p = 0.038) and adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.022) were the only significant factors associated with risk of VTE. The incidence of VTE after MIS for gynecologic malignancy is low. Robotic surgery was associated with a lower incidence, although event rates are low, and further research is warranted.

Safety of vaginal surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Abdominal Radical hysterectomy (ARH) with pelvic lymph node assessment is considered the standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. Accepted routes have previously included laparoscopic or robotic approaches (LRH). Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal or vaginal radical hysterectomy (LVRH) are performed in some centers. The objective of this study is to compare surgical and oncological outcomes of LVRH, to laparoscopic and abdominal approaches. A retrospective multicenter analysis of consecutive cervical cancer cases who underwent a radical hysterectomy between 2007 and 2017 in eleven regional cancer centers across Canada. A comparison of patients stratified by surgical technique was undertaken. T-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square were used to compare patient characteristics. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were employed to compare recurrence and survival across surgical groups. A total of 1071 patients with cervical cancer stage IA1 with lymphovascular invasion to stage IIIC (FIGO 2018) <4 cm were identified. Postoperative complication rate was lowest for women undergoing LVRH (9.1 %, vs 18.3 % and 22.1 % for minimally invasive and open respectively). During follow up, 114 women recurred, and 70 women died. 5-year recurrence-free survival was 85.4 % for LRH, 89.4 % for ARH and 92.2 % for LVRH. LVRH was not found to be associated with a higher risk of recurrence or death than ARH on multivariable analysis (aHR for recurrence 0.62, CI 0.21-1.77; aHR for death 0.63, CI 0.14-2.77) CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, vaginal or laparoscopy-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer was associated with favorable perioperative and oncological outcomes.

2Papers
9Collaborators
Genital Neoplasms, FemaleUterine Cervical NeoplasmsNeoplasm Staging