Investigator

Chiao-Yun Lin

cgmh

CLChiao-Yun Lin
Papers(7)
Comparison of immedia…Rare Subtype of Endom…Inhibition of nucleop…Hypoxia-associated ge…<i>BRCA1/2</i>mutatio…JAK2-Mediated Phospho…Human papillomavirus …
Institutions(1)
Chang Gung Memorial H…

Papers

Inhibition of nucleophosmin/B23 sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to immune check-point blockade via PD-L1 in ovarian cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that against programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 have been approved as a promising treatment of many human cancers. However, the responses to these ICIs were limited in patients with ovarian cancer. Studies have indicated that the response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade might be correlated with the PD-L1 expression level in cancer cells. Nucleophosmin (NPM/B23) was found to be a potential target for immunotherapy. Whether NPM/B23 plays a role in cancer-associated immunity, such as PD-1/PD-L1 axis, and its underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown in ovarian cancer. We applied ovarian cancer cell lines as research models. The effect of modulating PD-L1 by NPM/B23 was subsequently confirmed via Western blot, flow cytometry, qRT-PCR, luciferase reporter assays, and immunoprecipitation. Protein stability and ubiquitin assay assays were used to analyze the interplay between NPM/B23 and NF-ĸB/p65 in PD-L1 regulation. The MOSEC/Luc xenograft mouse model was used to validate the role of NPM/B23-PD-L1 through tumor growth in vivo. Our results revealed that NPM/B23 negatively regulates PD-L1 expression via a protein complex with NF-κB/p65 and through an IFN-γ pathway. Moreover, NPM/B23 inhibitor/modulator sensitized ovarian cancer cells to the anti-PD-1 antibody by regulating PD-L1 expression in the immunocompetent mouse model. Compared to anti-PD-1 antibody alone, a combination of anti-PD-1 antibody and NPM/B23 inhibitor/modulator showed reduced tumorigenesis and increased CD8 Targeting NPM/B23 is a novel and potential therapeutic approach to sensitize ovarian cancer cells to immunotherapy.

Human papillomavirus prevalence, genotype distribution, and prognostic factors of vaginal cancer

AbstractWe aimed to investigate human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence and genotype distribution and prognostic factors in vaginal cancer (VC). VC patients who received treatment between 1989 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. L1 general polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by HPV Blot (King Car, I‐Lan, Taiwan) and E6 type‐specific‐PCR were performed for genotyping firstly. P16 and p53 immunohistochemistry staining was performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified predictors of clinical outcomes.79 VC patients were eligible for analysis. 73 patients (92.4%) were squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 6 (7.6%) as non‐SCC. The median follow‐up time was 134.3 months (range 0.9–273.4). Among nine initially HPV‐negative cases, seven were identified as being positive through HPV16/18/45/52/58 whole‐genome amplification followed by Sanger sequencing (WGASS). HPV DNA sequences were detected in 98.6% of SCC and 83.3% of non‐SCC, respectively, with HPV16 (49.4%), HPV52 (15.2%) and HPV58 (8.9%) being predominant. Patients with paraaortic lymph node (LN) metastasis had a 5‐year cancer‐specific survival (CSS) rate of 0%. Multivariate analysis revealed that only p16 and stage were significantly correlated with prognosis. Variables with strong correlations (p16‐ and HPV‐positivity, LN metastasis and stage), were included in models 2–5 alternatively. Stage III/IV (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.64–4.56) and LN metastasis (HR = 2.81–3.44) were significant negative predictors of CSS, whereas p16‐positivity (HR = 0.29–0.32) and HPV‐positivity (HR = 0.14) were related to better prognosis. In conclusion, 97.5% of VCs were HPV‐positive with WGASS. Stage III/IV and LN metastasis were significant negative predictors, whereas p16‐ and HPV‐positivity were significantly associated with better prognosis.

11Works
7Papers

Positions

2008–

Researcher

cgmh