Chia-Yi Lee

Dome-type extracorporeal manual morcellation during laparoscopic uterine surgery: Two years’ experience in a teaching hospital

This study aims to describe the dome-type manual morcellation technique, a modified form of C-type incision, its comparative advantages over existing morcellation methods, the perioperative outcomes of trainees with varying experience levels, and the variables influencing morcellation speed based on our two years of experience. This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy or hysterectomy using dome-type morcellation for tissue extraction at a tertiary teaching hospital between May 2020 and September 2022. Morcellation was performed by either a single surgeon or a trainee (resident). Basic patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and morcellation time and speed were compared between the surgeon and trainee group. Regression models were employed to analyze variables influencing morcellation speed. A total of 41 women were enrolled. Among them, 20 procedures were performed by a surgeon alone, while the remaining 21 procedures were completed by trainees under the surgeon's supervision. The median weight of the specimens was 378 g (range 91-1345 g), and the median time for morcellation was 10 min (range 1-55 min). The median morcellation speed of surgeon and trainees was 70.25 and 31.7 g/min, respectively. Trainees' level of experience was found to be associated with morcellation speed, particularly for soft specimens. Additionally, both incision size and specimen stiffness were significantly associated with morcellation speed. No morcellation-related complications or bag ruptures were observed. Dome-type manual morcellation is an intuitive, efficient and safe method for specimen removal and is easy to learn for beginners.

Outcome and Subsequent Pregnancy after Fertility-Sparing Surgery of Early-Stage Cervical Cancers

We aimed to investigate the outcomes and subsequent pregnancies of early-stage cervical cancer patients who received conservative fertility-sparing surgery. Women with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent conservative or fertility-sparing surgery in a tertiary medical center were reviewed from 2004 to 2017. Each patient’s clinicopathologic characteristics, adjuvant therapy, subsequent pregnancy, and outcome were recorded. There were 32 women recruited, including 12 stage IA1 patients and 20 stage IB1 patients. Twenty-two patients received conization/LEEP and the other 10 patients received radical trachelectomy. Two patients did not complete the definite treatment after fertility-sparing surgery. There were 11 women who had subsequent pregnancies and nine had at least one live birth. The live birth rate was 73.3% (11/15). We conclude that patients with early-stage cervical cancer who undergo fertility-sparing surgery can have a successful pregnancy and delivery. However, patients must receive a detailed consultation before surgery and undergo definitive treatment, if indicated, and regular postoperative surveillance.