Chel Hun Choi

Durvalumab versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent Ovarian Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma (MOCCA/APGOT-OV2/GCGS-OV3): A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase 2 Trial

Abstract Purpose: The optimal treatment of recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma (rOCCC) remains unknown. This is the first randomized trial to compare durvalumab with chemotherapy in rOCCC. Patients and Methods: MOCCA is a randomized, phase 2 trial conducted in Singapore, Korea, and Australia. Eligible patients had rOCCC with recurrence after platinum-based chemotherapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, and no prior immune checkpoint blockade. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to durvalumab (1,500 mg every 4 weeks) or chemotherapy. Patients progressing on chemotherapy were allowed to cross over to durvalumab. The primary outcome was progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, objective response rates, and safety. Results: Forty-eight eligible women were assigned to durvalumab (N = 31) or chemotherapy (N = 17). The median progression-free survival was 7.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 7.0–16.0] and 14.0 (95% CI, 7.0–32.9) weeks with durvalumab and chemotherapy, respectively (HR = 1.6; 95% CI, 0.8–3.0; P = 0.92). The median overall survival was 37.9 (95% CI, 21.7–143.0) and 40.6 (95% CI, 25.0–not reached) weeks, respectively (HR = 1.5; 95% CI, 0.7–3.3; P = 0.85). The difference in objective response rates between the groups was not statistically significant (durvalumab 9.7% vs. physician’s choice chemotherapy 18.8%; difference −9.1%; 95% CI, −31.3% to 12.9%; P = 0.83). Fewer all-grade (35.5% vs. 68.8%) and high-grade (9.7% vs. 31.3%) treatment-related adverse events were observed for durvalumab. PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS)+ was observed in 28.9% (CPS ≥1%) and 10.5% (CPS ≥10%) of patients. PIK3CA mutations were associated with time to progression on durvalumab ≥12 weeks [relative risk (mutated vs. wild-type) 2.83; 95% CI, 1.16–14.17]. Conclusions: Durvalumab was well-tolerated but did not improve efficacy outcomes compared with chemotherapy in rOCCC.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Dual Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer: Final Analysis of TRU-D Phase II Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Abstract Purpose: This open-label, investigator-initiated, phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety, survival, and neoadjuvant outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with dual immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients and Methods: Between June 2019 and July 2021, 45 patients with unresectable stage III to IV EOC were enrolled. The patients received three cycles of NAC combined with durvalumab and tremelimumab. All patients underwent interval debulking surgery and received three cycles of durvalumab and adjuvant chemotherapy, followed by 12 cycles of durvalumab as maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint was the 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate; the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate after NAC, a chemotherapy response score, pathologic complete response, overall survival, and safety. The preplanned exploratory analyses assessed the lymphocyte infiltration, PD-L1 expression, and genomic profiles of pretreatment tumors. Results: The 12-month PFS rate was 65.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 52.8–not estimated (NE)], whereas the 24- and 30-month PFS rates were 38.6% (95% CI, 26.7–NE) and 36.4% (95% CI, 24.7–NE), respectively. After NAC, the objective response rate was 86.7%, whereas 14 patients (31.1%) had a chemotherapy response score of three, and five (11.1%) achieved pathologic complete response. The 30-month overall survival rate was 87.7%. The most common grade ≥3 adverse event was neutropenia (26.7%). In an exploratory analysis, patients with pre-NAC tumors showing PD-L1 (combined positive score) ≥1, high Mutation Signature 3, and a high extracellular matrix signature demonstrated improved PFS outcomes. Conclusions: NAC combined with dual immune checkpoint inhibitors is feasible for advanced-stage EOC and shows promising activity with a durable clinical response.

Clinical outcome and pattern of care for isolated or incidental serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), a potential precursor of high-grade serous carcinoma, is associated with subsequent carcinomas development. This study aimed to identify cases of STIC and serous tubal intraepithelial lesions (STIL) and examine clinical outcomes and patterns of care in This retrospective study was conducted at six institutions to examine patients with isolated STIC/STIL. Demographic, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up data were collected from the date of implementation of Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriated end protocol, which varied from 2006 to 2015, until December 2022. We analyzed the data of 1,119 women who underwent RRSO and were carriers of While patient monitoring after STIC/STIL detection may be considered due to the minimal risk of carcinoma, excessive concern may not be necessary. Furthermore, adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered only with caution.

Clinical practice guidelines for ovarian cancer: an update to the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines

We updated the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of ovarian cancer as version 5.1. The ovarian cancer guideline team of the KSGO published announced the fifth version (version 5.0) of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of ovarian cancer in December 2023. In version 5.0, the selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on the data available up to December 2022. Therefore, we updated the guidelines version 5.0 with newly accumulated clinical data and added 5 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of ovarian cancer between 2023 and 2024. For each question, recommendation was provided together with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

Clinical guidelines for ovarian cancer: the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines

Since the latest practice guidelines for ovarian cancer were developed by the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) in 2021, many studies have examined the efficacy and safety of various treatments for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Therefore, the need to develop recommendations for EOC treatments has been raised. This study searched the literature using 4 key items and the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome: the efficacy and safety of poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors in newly diagnosed advanced EOC; the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal plus intravenous chemotherapy in optimally debulked advanced EOC; the efficacy and safety of secondary cytoreductive surgery in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer; and the efficacy and safety of the addition of bevacizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy in first platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC patients who received prior bevacizumab. The evidence for these recommendations, according to each key question, was evaluated using a systematic review and meta-analysis. The committee of ovarian cancer of the KSGO developed updated guidelines for treatments of EOC.

Outcomes of extended progestin therapy in atypical endometrial hyperplasia patients without an initial response to progestin: a retrospective study from two tertiary centers in Korea and Taiwan

In this study, we evaluated the role of prolonged progestin treatment on atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) patients who did not achieve complete regression (CR) after at least 3 months of progestin treatment. Possible prognostic factors predicting disease regression and recurrence were also assessed. We retrospectively identified patients who had histologically confirmed persistent disease after at least 3 months of progestin treatment at two tertiary centers in Korea and Taiwan. Clinicopathologic factors and clinical outcomes were obtained from medical records. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between covariates and the probability of CR and relapse. Fifty-two patients were included. Thirty-seven of 52 patients (71.2%) achieved CR after prolonged progestin treatment. Median time from starting progestin treatment to CR was 12.0 months. Daily administration of medroxyprogesterone acetate ≥200 mg or megestrol acetate ≥80 mg was associated with higher probability of regression. Nineteen of 37 patients (51.4%) experienced recurrence, with median time from CR to relapse of 15.0 months. Body mass index ≥27 was associated with higher relapse probability. Twelve of 16 patients with disease progression to endometrial carcinoma underwent surgery. The 12 cases had stage I tumors and lived without disease. Extension of progestin treatment course is feasible for AEH patients without an initial response to progestin. Higher daily progestin dosage was associated with higher probability of CR, and obesity was associated with higher risk of relapse. The patients without an initial response to progestins and whose AEH progressed to endometrial carcinoma had good prognoses.

Significance of HPV status on tumor response and treatment outcomes in endocervical adenocarcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study

We aimed to compare tumor response and treatment outcomes between human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated (HPVA) and HPV-independent (HPVI) endocervical adenocarcinomas (ADCs) treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and to identify prognostic factors. We conducted a retrospective review of 40 patients with endocervical ADCs treated with definitive CCRT (stages I-IVA) between 2011 and 2022. Based on pathological review the cases were categorized as HPVA or HPVI ADCs. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the characteristics, complete response (CR) rates, and survival outcomes. Of 40 patients, 22 (55.0%) had HPVA and 18 (45.0%) had HPVI ADCs. HPVI patients had significantly higher rates of parametrial invasion (94.4% vs. 45.5%, p=0.001). CR was achieved in 57.5% of patients and was significantly more common in the HPVA group (81.8% vs. 27.8%, p=0.001). Patients with HPVI had higher recurrence rates (88.9% vs. 50.0%, p=0.016) and lower 3-year progression-free survival (PFS, 16.7% vs. 49.8%, p=0.001), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, 38.1% vs. 80.8%, p=0.001), and overall survival (OS, 42.3% vs. 90.7%, p=0.002) rates. HPVA remained a significant factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.09-10.81; p=0.035) and OS rates (HR=6.83; 95% CI=1.17-39.80; p=0.033) in multivariate analysis. HPVI ADC was associated with a lower response to definitive CCRT and worse prognosis than HPVA ADC. These findings suggest the need for tailored treatment strategies based on the HPV status.

Survival Effects of Cytoreductive Surgery for Refractory Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Salvage second-line chemotherapy is usually recommended for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC) who develop progressive disease (PD) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Herein, we investigated the role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for such patients. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 36 patients with AEOC who developed PD after receiving NAC at two tertiary academic centers with different treatment strategies between 2001 and 2016. Patients who developed PD after NAC were consistently treated with CRS at one hospital (group A; n=13) and second-line chemotherapy at another (group B; n=23). The clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between the groups. Overall survival (OS) was longer in group A than in group B (19.4 months vs. 7.9 months; CRS may result in a survival benefit even in patients with AEOC who develop PD after NAC.

A single-arm phase II study of olaparib maintenance with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab in BRCA non-mutated patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (OPEB-01)

The optimal treatment of ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04361370, Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0005144.

Biomarker-guided targeted therapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (AMBITION; KGOG 3045): a multicentre, open-label, five-arm, uncontrolled, umbrella trial

Management of heavily pre-treated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer remains a therapeutic challenge. Outcomes are poor with non-platinum, single-agent chemotherapy (CT); however, molecularly targeted anticancer therapies provide new options. This open-label, investigator-initiated, phase 2 umbrella trial (NCT03699449) enrolled patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (at least 2 prior lines of CT and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0/1) to receive combination therapy based on homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status determined by archival tumour sample assessment. HRD-positive patients were randomised to either olaparib 200mg bid tablet + cediranib 30mg qd (arm 1) or olaparib 300mg bid tablet + durvalumab 1,500mg q4w (arm 2). HRD-negative patients were allocated to either durvalumab 1,500 mg q4w + pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or topotecan or weekly paclitaxel (6 cycles; arm 3, those with PD-L1 expression) or durvalumab 1,500 mg q4w + tremelimumab 75mg q4w (4 doses) + PLD or topotecan or weekly paclitaxel (4 cycles; arm 4, those without PD-L1 expression). Arm 5 (durvalumab 1,500 mg q4w + tremelimumab 300mg [1 dose] + weekly paclitaxel [60 mg/m² D1,8,15 q4w for 4 cycles] was initiated after arm 4 completed. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1). Between Dec 2018 and Oct 2020, 70 patients (median 57 years; median 3 prior treatment lines [range 2-10]) were treated (n=16, 14, 5, 18, and 17, respectively). Overall ORR was 37.1% (26/70, 95% confidence interval=25.9, 49.5); 2 achieved complete response. ORR was 50%, 42.9%, 20%, 33.3%, and 29.4%, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 37.5%, 35.7%, 20%, 66.7%, and 35.3% of patients, respectively. No TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation and no grade 5 TRAEs were observed. This study, the first biomarker-driven umbrella trial in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer, suggests clinical utility with biomarker-driven targeted therapy. All treatment combinations were manageable, and without unexpected toxicities. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03699449.

Discrepancy between Cytology and Histology in Cervical Cancer Screening: a Multicenter Retrospective Study (KGOG 1040)

Cervical cancer is the fourth common cancer in women worldwide. The Papanicolau test is the primary screening procedure to detect abnormal cervical cells. Colposcopy is the main procedure for discriminating high-grade cervical lesions. The study aimed at clarifying the discrepancy between cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy histology as well as confounding factors. Eligible patients visited thirteen tertiary hospitals for colposcopic biopsy following cervical cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes between January and December 2018. Baseline characteristics including age, body mass index (BMI), and parity were collected. In our study, 3,798 eligible patients were included. Mean age of patients was 42.7 (19-88) years and mean BMI was 22.5 (16.9-34.1) kg/m². The referred cervical cytologic findings consisted of 495 normal, 1,390 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, 380 atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 792 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 593 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 79 atypical glandular cells, 46 squamous cell carcinoma, and 23 adenocarcinoma. HPV-positive findings were found in 3,008 (79.2%) patients and were not detected in 914 (24.1%) cases. The risk of unexpected low-grade lesions from histology was higher in patients > 45 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.137; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 1.475-3.096). In contrast, the risk of unexpected high-grade lesions from colposcopic biopsy was lower in patients ≥ 45 years (OR, 0.530; 95% CI, 0.367-0.747) and HPV 16/18 infection was higher than other HPV (OR, 1.848; 95% CI, 1.385-2.469). Age and HPV genotypes were responsible for the discrepancies between cytology and histology. Precautions should be taken for women over the age of 45 in triage for colposcopy in order to avoid unnecessary testing.

Significance of serum CA125 level in surgically resected cervical adenocarcinoma with adverse features

Unlike cervical squamous cell carcinoma, there are no consensus criteria for serum tumor markers in cervical adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to identify the prognostic value of preoperative carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) levels in cervical adenocarcinoma patients with adverse pathologic features. A total of 105 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiation therapy were included. Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. Using a cutoff value of 50 U/mL, 83 and 22 patients had low- and high-CA125, respectively. Patients with high-CA125 had a larger tumor size, more frequent parametrial extension, and more frequent lymph node metastasis than those with low-CA125. During a median follow-up of 59.3 (interquartile range, 32.7-97.8) months, patients with high-CA125 showed inferior 5-year LRFS, DMFS, and OS rates compared to those with low-CA125 (38.5% vs. 70.0%; 37.0% vs. 69.4%; 43.6% vs. 78.1%, respectively, all p<0.05). In multivariable analysis, the high-CA125 remained significant prognostic factor for LRFS, DMFS, and OS (all p<0.05). Furthermore, 12 patients with high-CA125 at recurrence exhibited lower 5-year OS rates than 21 patients with low-CA125 at recurrence (0.0% vs. 51.3%, p=0.003). In this retrospective analysis, the serum CA125 level at diagnosis and recurrence was related to the extent of disease and prognosis of cervical adenocarcinoma with adverse pathologic features. A CA125 level of ≥50 U/mL may be a prognostic surrogate marker for cervical adenocarcinoma in patients with the presence of adverse factors.

Comparative performance of various human papillomavirus assays available in Korea for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

AbstractAimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or higher lesions among available human papillomavirus infection (HPV) genotyping tests in Korea.MethodsEligible patients visited 13 tertiary hospitals for colposcopic biopsy following cervical cytology and HPV genotyping test between January and December 2018. Baseline characteristics including age, body mass index (BMI), and parity were collected from 3798 patients. The performance of the Roche Cobas HPV 4800 was evaluated against other domestic HPV assays to detect CIN2 or higher.ResultsA total of seven types of HPV genotyping tests were analyzed in the research institutes. A total of 1358 patients (35.8%) tested Anyplex II HPV 28 and 701 patients (18.5%) tested Cobas 4800 HPV. The overall sensitivity in the detection of CIN2 or higher was 41.5% (38.9–44.1) in patients positive for HPV 16/18.The Cobas test for HPV 16/18 was concordant with other assays evaluated for detection of CIN2 or higher and showed sensitivity of 46.6%, which was not significantly different from other assays. Although Anyplex II HPV28 (Seegene) showed slightly decreased sensitivity for detecting CIN2 or higher lesion with HPV 16/18 positive (39.8%, p &lt; 0.05) compared to Cobas 4800, in aspect of high‐risk HPV positive, Anyplex II HPV28 showed increased sensitivity (96.9%, p &lt; 0.05).ConclusionThe performance of the HPV genotype test that were commonly used in Korea was concordant with Cobas HPV test. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety, efficiency, and cost‐effectiveness of the various commercially available domestic HPV assays.

Predicting prognosis according to the updated WHO classification in patients with endocervical adenocarcinoma treated with surgery and radiotherapy

The recently updated World Health Organization classification divides endocervical adenocarcinomas (ADCs) into human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated (HPVA) and HPV-independent (HPVI) ADCs. This study aimed to investigate the differences in the clinical features and treatment outcomes between patients with HPVA and HPVI. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records and pathology slides of 123 patients with endocervical ADC who underwent radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy. Tumor characteristics, patterns of failure, and survival outcomes were compared between HPVA and HPVI ADCs. Eighty-one (65.9%) and 42 (34.1%) patients were diagnosed with HPVA and HPVI ADCs, respectively. HPVI ADC showed more frequent positive vaginal resection margin (VRM) and peritoneal seeding than HPVA ADC. After a median follow-up of 58.1 months, local recurrence and distant metastasis were more frequently observed in HPVI ADC than in HPVA ADC. Both local recurrence-free survival (77.3% vs. 91.8%) and distant metastasis-free survival (50.1% vs. 73.7%) rates of HPVI ADC were lower than those of HPVA ADC. Disease-free survival was not significantly different between HPVI and HPVA ADCs. We demonstrated that HPVI ADC exhibited higher rates of VRM involvement and peritoneal seeding than those of HPVA ADC, resulting in higher rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Further studies with larger populations are warranted to explore optimal treatment strategies based on the histological subtypes of endocervical ADC.

Phase II randomized study of first-line carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with pembrolizumab, followed by maintenance pembrolizumab alone or with nesuparib, in mismatch-repair proficient, advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (PENELOPE).

Although recent clinical trials proved survival benefit from the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy, treatment of mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (arEC) is challenging. As poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors enhance the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors when combined, improvement of survival is expected by dual maintenance in this population. The PENELOPE trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of dual maintenance with nesuparib, an orally active PARP1/2 and tankyrase 1/2 inhibitor, and pembrolizumab after paclitaxel/carboplatin plus pembrolizumab (TCP) treatment in patients with pMMR arEC. In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-comparative phase II trial, patients with pMMR arEC, naïve to first-line chemotherapy, will be enrolled. Six patients will be enrolled in stage 1 (safety run-in) and treated with TCP for 6 cycles followed by dual maintenance with nesuparib and pembrolizumab. The study will proceed to stage 2 (dose expansion) if less than 33% of patients in stage 1 experience a dose-limiting toxicity. Otherwise, additional patients will be enrolled in stage 1 at a lower dose level. In stage 2, 80 patients will be randomized (1:1) to: arm A) TCP followed by maintenance with pembrolizumab; arm B) TCP followed by dual maintenance with nesuparib and pembrolizumab. Patients are planned to receive maintenance treatment up to 14 cycles every 6 weeks. Primary endpoint is investigator-assessed progression-free survival (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1) of each arm vs. historical control, which is the placebo arm for pMMR patients in the NRG-GY018 study, and key secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, and safety. Enrollment began in Q4 2024. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06502743.

Therapeutic effects of surgical debulking of metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancer IIICr: a trial protocol for a phase III, multicenter, randomized controlled study (KGOG1047/DEBULK trial)

Bulky or multiple lymph node (LN) metastases are associated with poor prognosis in cervical cancer, and the size or number of LN metastases is not yet reflected in the staging system and therapeutic strategy. Although the therapeutic effects of surgical resection of bulky LNs before standard treatment have been reported in several retrospective studies, well-planned randomized clinical studies are lacking. Therefore, the aim of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) 1047/DEBULK trial is to investigate whether the debulking surgery of bulky or multiple LNs prior to concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) improves the survival rate of patients with cervical cancer IIICr diagnosed by imaging tests. The KGOG 1047/DEBULK trial is a phase III, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving patients with bulky or multiple LN metastases in cervical cancer IIICr. This study will include patients with a short-axis diameter of a pelvic or para-aortic LN ≥2 cm or ≥3 LNs with a short-axis diameter ≥1 cm and for whom CCRT is planned. The treatment arms will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either receive CCRT (control arm) or undergo surgical debulking of bulky or multiple LNs before CCRT (experimental arm). CCRT consists of extended-field external beam radiotherapy/pelvic radiotherapy, brachytherapy and LN boost, and weekly chemotherapy with cisplatin (40 mg/m²), 4-6 times administered intravenously. The primary endpoint will be 3-year progression-free survival rate. The secondary endpoints will be 3-year overall survival rate, treatment-related complications, and accuracy of radiological diagnosis of bulky or multiple LNs. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05421650; Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007137.

Olaparib Maintenance With Pembrolizumab & Bevacizumab in BRCA Non-mutated Patients With Platinum-sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

This study is phase II, open label, clinical trial to determine the efficacy of Olaparib maintenance with Bevacizumab and Pembrolizumab by assessment progression-free survival(6 months PFS rate) in BRCA non-mutated patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

An uMbrella Study of BIomarker-driven Targeted Therapy In Patients With Platinum-resistant Recurrent OvariaN Cancer(AMBITION)

This study is a pilot study of biomarker-driven targeted therapy in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. More specifically, this is a randomized, multi-center, open label, phase II study for Homologous Recombination Deficiency(HRD)+ patients and a biomarker-driven multiple-arm phase II study for Homologous Recombination Deficiency(HRD)- patients. This study will consist of a number of study modules (substudies), each evaluating the antitumor activity of targeted agents in patients whose tumors express specific phenotype relevant to the molecules under investigation.