Charalampos Theofanakis

Highlights from the 24th European Congress on Gynaecological Oncology in Istanbul: an ENYGO-IJGC Fellows compilation

What Has Changed in the Management of Uterine Serous Carcinomas? Two Decades of Experience

Uterine serous carcinoma accounts for 3–10% of endometrial cancers, but it is the most lethal histopathological subtype. The molecular characterization of endometrial carcinomas has allowed novel therapeutic approaches for these patients. We undertook a retrospective analysis of patients with uterine serous carcinomas treated in our hospital within the last two decades to identify possible changes in their management. The patients and their characteristics were evenly distributed across the two decades. Treatment modalities did not change significantly throughout this period. After adjuvant treatment, patients’ median disease-free survival was 42.07 months (95% CI: 20.28–63.85), and it did not differ significantly between the two decades (p = 0.059). The median overall survival was 47.51 months (95% Cl: 32.18–62.83), and it significantly favored the first decade’s patients (p = 0.024). In patients with de novo metastatic or recurrent disease, median progression-free survival was 7.8 months (95% Cl: 5.81–9.93), whereas both the median progression-free survival and the median overall survival of these patients did not show any significant improvement during the examined time period. Overall, the results of our study explore the minor changes in respect of uterine serous carcinoma’s treatment over the last two decades, which are reflected in the survival outcomes of these patients and consequently underline the critical need for therapeutic advances in the near future.

Fertility sparing surgery for early-stage clear cell carcinoma of the ovary; A systematic review and analysis of obstetric outcomes

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCOC), accounts for 5-25% of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cases. A significant proportion of patients with CCOC are of reproductive age, wishing to preserve their fertility. The application of fertility sparing surgery (FSS) in those patients has been extensively criticized, due to the high reported recurrence rates and chemotherapy resistance. The aim of the present study was to accumulate the current knowledge on obstetric and fertility outcomes of patients with early stage CCOC who underwent fertility sparing surgery. A meticulous search of 3 electronic databases was conducted for articles published up to June 2020 relevant in the field using the terms "ovarian cancer", "clear cell", "fertility sparing", "conservative treatment". Studies that reported pregnancy and maternal outcomes after fertility sparing surgery for the management of early stage CCOC were considered eligible. A total of 5 studies which comprised of 60 patients with early stage CCOC, who underwent fertility-sparing surgery, were reviewed. Ten patients (16.6%) had disease recurrence. The total clinical pregnancy rate of 32% with a proportion of 24% of live birth rates in 12 of the included patients. The median interval from surgery to pregnancy was 41.5 months, while no evidence of disease was recorded among the patients who achieved pregnancy. No difference in survival and recurrence rates among patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery and those who had radical surgical procedures. Fertility-sparing treatment for International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage IA/IC CCOC seems to be an acceptable treatment option for selected premenopausal women who strongly wish to preserve their childbearing potential. However, larger studies are needed to validate the safety of the procedure.

Health care organization for gynecologic oncology patients fleeing Ukraine: Insights from the European Network of Young Gyne Oncologists survey during the first six months of the military conflict

The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 caused a mass displacement of over 6 million people, including many women requiring urgent medical care, such as those with gynecologic malignancies. The disruption of cancer treatment in conflict zones poses critical challenges because timely oncologic care is vital for patient survival. This study, conducted by the European Network of Young Gynecologic Oncologists, aimed to assess the health care responses provided to Ukrainian gynecologic oncology patients across European countries during the first 6 months of the conflict. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to European Network of Young Gynecologic Oncologists members between July and August 2022, gathering insights from health care providers about their experiences in managing Ukrainian gynecologic oncology patients. The survey explored the medical needs of displaced patients, challenges encountered, and the resources available. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. During the study period, approximately 400 gynecologic oncology patients fleeing Ukraine received care in 38 European health care centers represented by the respondents (N = 50). Surgical interventions (54%), chemotherapy (40%), and specialist consultations (32%) were identified as the most common medical needs. The key barriers to care included language difficulties (44%), lack of previous medical documentation (40%), and inconsistencies in treatment protocols between centers. Psychological support was notably insufficient, with 36% of respondents reporting a lack of adequate resources for addressing mental health needs. The study identifies critical barriers to the continuity of gynecologic oncology care for displaced patients during humanitarian crises. Addressing language barriers, ensuring access to patient medical histories, and providing psychological support are essential to improve care for refugees. The findings underscore the importance for international collaboration and the development of robust frameworks for delivering oncologic care during crises.

Global survey on training and practice in sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial and cervical cancer among early-career gynecologic oncologists

This survey was designed to evaluate exposure to sentinel mapping for cervical and endometrial cancers in addition to the quality and availability of surgical training in sentinel procedures around the world. Furthermore, we aimed to identify obstacles in surgical training in the sentinel procedure to support the adoption of this technique in clinical practice. A 52-item survey was developed and computed using Qualtrics XM and SurveyMonkey software. The target population were members of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and the International Gynecological Cancer Society aged ≤40 years. The study invitation was disseminated within both organizations' database. The survey hyperlink was active between September and December 2022. Respondents using the same Internet Protocol address were excluded to avoid duplication of responses. Responses to <50% questions were excluded. Overall, 238 respondents joined the survey, and 182 (76.5%) provided answers that met the inclusion criteria. Sentinel mapping was implemented for a longer period and used more frequently in endometrial than in cervical carcinoma; 55% of the responders were initially trained in systematic lymph node dissection, and 22% were not yet trained in any lymph node staging. The main challenges in applying sentinel procedure for early-career gynecologic oncologists were no access to hands-on training (n = 22, 12.1%) and no clinical routine in performing systematic pelvic (n = 15, 8.2%) and para-aortic (n = 35, 19.2%) lymph node dissection in case of failed mapping. Although sentinel lymph node biopsy is integrated in cervical and endometrial cancer guidelines, a significant number of institutions do not implement this procedure in clinical routine, and 22% of early-career gynecologic oncologists are not trained in any type of surgical lymph node staging. Support for sentinel mapping in national guidelines and guided training opportunities are needed to apply this method globally.