CLPCécile Le Page
Papers(6)
Genomic analysis of l…Refined cut-off for T…Therapeutic options f…Exploring the Clinica…Does the “Devil” orig…DEVIL, VAAD and vLSC …
Collaborators(9)
Ian CampbellMartin KöbelMichael ChurchmanSimon F RoyVincent Quoc‐Huy TrinhDane CheasleyAnna DeFazioKhalid El BairiKylie L Gorringe
Institutions(9)
Hec MontralPeter MacCallum Cance…University of CalgaryUniversity of Edinbur…McGill UniversityVanderbilt University…The University of Wes…The University of Syd…Cancer Biomarkers Wor…

Papers

Genomic analysis of low‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma to identify key drivers and therapeutic vulnerabilities

Abstract Low‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is associated with a poor response to existing chemotherapy, highlighting the need to perform comprehensive genomic analysis and identify new therapeutic vulnerabilities. The data presented here represent the largest genetic study of LGSOCs to date ( n  = 71), analysing 127 candidate genes derived from whole exome sequencing cohorts to generate mutation and copy‐number variation data. Additionally, immunohistochemistry was performed on our LGSOC cohort assessing oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, TP53, and CDKN2A status. Targeted sequencing identified 47% of cases with mutations in key RAS/RAF pathway genes ( KRAS , BRAF , and NRAS ), as well as mutations in putative novel driver genes including USP9X (27%), MACF1 (11%), ARID1A (9%), NF2 (4%), DOT1L (6%), and ASH1L (4%). Immunohistochemistry evaluation revealed frequent oestrogen/progesterone receptor positivity (85%), along with CDKN2A protein loss (10%) and CDKN2A protein overexpression (6%), which were linked to shorter disease outcomes. Indeed, 90% of LGSOC samples harboured at least one potentially actionable alteration, which in 19/71 (27%) cases were predictive of clinical benefit from a standard treatment, either in another cancer's indication or in LGSOC specifically. In addition, we validated ubiquitin‐specific protease 9X (USP9X), which is a chromosome X‐linked substrate‐specific deubiquitinase and tumour suppressor, as a relevant therapeutic target for LGSOC. Our comprehensive genomic study highlighted that there is an addiction to a limited number of unique ‘driver’ aberrations that could be translated into improved therapeutic paths. © 2020 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Refined cut-off for TP53 immunohistochemistry improves prediction of TP53 mutation status in ovarian mucinous tumors: implications for outcome analyses

TP53 mutations are implicated in the progression of mucinous borderline tumors (MBOT) to mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOC). Optimized immunohistochemistry (IHC) for TP53 has been established as a proxy for the TP53 mutation status in other ovarian tumor types. We aimed to confirm the ability of TP53 IHC to predict TP53 mutation status in ovarian mucinous tumors and to evaluate the association of TP53 mutation status with survival among patients with MBOT and MOC. Tumor tissue from an initial cohort of 113 women with MBOT/MOC was stained with optimized IHC for TP53 using tissue microarrays (75.2%) or full sections (24.8%) and interpreted using established criteria as normal or abnormal (overexpression, complete absence, or cytoplasmic). Cases were considered concordant if abnormal IHC staining predicted deleterious TP53 mutations. Discordant tissue microarray cases were re-evaluated on full sections and interpretational criteria were refined. The initial cohort was expanded to a total of 165 MBOT and 424 MOC for the examination of the association of survival with TP53 mutation status, assessed either by TP53 IHC and/or sequencing. Initially, 82/113 (72.6%) cases were concordant using the established criteria. Refined criteria for overexpression to account for intratumoral heterogeneity and terminal differentiation improved concordance to 93.8% (106/113). In the expanded cohort, 19.4% (32/165) of MBOT showed evidence for TP53 mutation and this was associated with a higher risk of recurrence, disease-specific death, and all-cause mortality (overall survival: HR = 4.6, 95% CI 1.5-14.3, p = 0.0087). Within MOC, 61.1% (259/424) harbored a TP53 mutation, but this was not associated with survival (overall survival, p = 0.77). TP53 IHC is an accurate proxy for TP53 mutation status with refined interpretation criteria accounting for intratumoral heterogeneity and terminal differentiation in ovarian mucinous tumors. TP53 mutation status is an important biomarker to identify MBOT with a higher risk of mortality.

Therapeutic options for mucinous ovarian carcinoma

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is an uncommon ovarian cancer histotype that responds poorly to conventional chemotherapy regimens. Although long overall survival outcomes can occur with early detection and optimal surgical resection, recurrent and advanced disease are associated with extremely poor survival. There are no current guidelines specifically for the systemic management of recurrent MOC. We analyzed data from a large cohort of women with MOC to evaluate the potential for clinical utility from a range of systemic agents. We analyzed gene copy number (n = 191) and DNA sequencing data (n = 184) from primary MOC to evaluate signatures of mismatch repair deficiency and homologous recombination deficiency, and other genetic events. Immunohistochemistry data were collated for ER, CK7, CK20, CDX2, HER2, PAX8 and p16 (n = 117-166). Molecular aberrations noted in MOC that suggest a match with current targeted therapies include amplification of ERBB2 (26.7%) and BRAF mutation (9%). Observed genetic events that suggest potential efficacy for agents currently in clinical trials include: KRAS/NRAS mutations (66%), TP53 missense mutation (49%), RNF43 mutation (11%), ARID1A mutation (10%), and PIK3CA/PTEN mutation (9%). Therapies exploiting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) may not be effective in MOC, as only 1/191 had a high HRD score. Mismatch repair deficiency was similarly rare (1/184). Although genetically diverse, MOC has several potential therapeutic targets. Importantly, the lack of response to platinum-based therapy observed clinically corresponds to the lack of a genomic signature associated with HRD, and MOC are thus also unlikely to respond to PARP inhibition.

Exploring the Clinical Impact of Predictive Biomarkers in Serous Ovarian Carcinomas

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Although initial response rates to standard platinum-based treatment are at 70–80%, long-term response in advanced EOC disease is rarely achieved with the development of chemoresistance and recurrence, contributing to overall survival rates below 45%. Additional challenges stem from EOC heterogeneity, reflecting at least five histological subtypes, each with different underlying molecular characteristics and clinicopathology that have significant implications in treatment effectiveness and management. Since the last decade, technologies in genomics, proteomics and pathology have been deployed to find reliable clinical markers that can identify patients sensitive to standard chemotherapy treatments and stratify patients for more suitable targeted therapies. These efforts have identified several molecular markers of prognostic value that have been validated as biomarkers, such as BRCA and KRAS mutations, or are currently under investigation in clinical trials, such as CD8 T cells, immune checkpoint inhibitors and progesterone receptor. Recent advancements in biomarker research have also revealed new targets that have expanded treatment options, introducing poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, anti-angiogenic agents, inhibitors targeting signaling pathways, and immunotherapy to improve maintenance therapies or enhance first-line therapy. This review presents a summary of current biomarkers, in clinical use or under evaluation, demonstrating a potential to inform on patient selection for treatment efficacy and predict response to EOC therapies, with particular focus on the serous subtypes, including high-grade and low-grade serous carcinomas.

DEVIL, VAAD and vLSC constitute a spectrum of HPV‐independent, p53‐independent intra‐epithelial neoplasia of the vulva

AimsWe aimed to characterise a large cohort of non‐invasive, human papillomavirus (HPV) and p53‐independent verruciform lesions, such as ‘vulvar acanthosis with altered differentiation’ (VAAD), ‘differentiated exophytic vulvar intra‐epithelial lesion’ (DEVIL) and ‘verruciform lichen simplex chronicus’ (vLSC).Methods and resultsFrom January 2008 to December 2020 we retrospectively identified 36 eligible patients with verruciform non‐invasive lesions (n = 36) and collected clinical, histological and follow‐up parameters. Verruciform non‐invasive lesions occurred at a median age of 71 years, with a median follow‐up of 33.5 months. Clinically, pruritus was only reported in patients with VAAD (n = 3, 21%). Lesion colour was significantly different across categories (P = 0.028). Apart from the histopathological criteria already known to distinguish these entities (hypogranulosis, epithelial pallor and low‐magnification architecture), no other significant criteria were discovered and significant overlap was observed, particularly between VAAD and DEVIL. Patients with vLSC trended towards longer survival without recurrence compared to VAAD and DEVIL (P = 0.082), but showed comparable invasion‐free survival interval (P = 0.782). Squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) associated with either VAAD, DEVIL or vLSC displayed similar clinical, histopathological and biological parameters. In non‐invasive precursor lesions, stromal oedema was associated with invasion (P = 0.015) and remained so upon Cox regression analysis (P = 0.009).ConclusionOur study of HPV and p53 independent non‐invasive verruciform lesions of the vulva highlights significant clinical, histopathological and biological overlap between VAAD, DEVIL and vLSC, suggesting that these pre‐invasive lesions should be viewed as a spectrum. We also show that stromal features such as oedema might play an import role in progression to invasion.

65Works
6Papers
9Collaborators

Positions

Researcher

Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal

2020–

Researcher

McGill University Health Centre

2003–

Researcher

Centre de recherche du CHUM · Institut du cancer de Montreal

Education

Ph.D

Sorbonne Université Campus Pierre et Marie Curie

Links & IDs
0000-0002-8020-1544

Scopus: 7004526286

Researcher Id: B-3215-2010