Investigator

Carlos Stecca

Medical Oncologist · BC Cancer Agency, Medical Oncology

CSCarlos Stecca
Papers(2)
Adjuvant, neoadjuvant…PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors…
Collaborators(10)
Eric PasqualottoFrancisco Cezar Aquin…Ifrat Jahan PiyaIsadora MamedeIsrat Jahan RiyaLucca Moreira LopesMaria Eduarda Cavalca…Marianne Rodrigues Fe…Ney Pereira Carneiro …Rafael Lara Nohmi
Institutions(8)
Universidade Evangeli…Universidade Federal …Universidade Federal …Dhaka Medical College…Itaúna City HallUnknown InstitutionUniversidade De Perna…Universidade De So Pa…

Papers

Adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and surgical treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy remains the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. Alternative strategies, such as induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors, show promise but lack consensus. Other approaches, including adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, have also been explored. This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy of these approaches. A systematic review identified randomized controlled trials evaluating treatments for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2 to IVA locally advanced cervical cancer. Interventions included concurrent chemoradiotherapy, induction chemotherapy, neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy alone, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, surgery, or their combinations. Progression-free and overall survival were assessed. HRs were extracted or reconstructed using individual patient data from Kaplan-Meier curves. A Bayesian network meta-analysis with random-effects models was conducted, with treatment rankings based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve and superiority probabilities. Forty-seven trials (14,155 patients; 89% with squamous histology) were included. For overall survival (41 trials, 12,241 patients), no significant differences were observed among treatments, but concurrent chemoradiotherapy showed a trend toward superiority over radiotherapy alone (HR 0.84, 95% credible interval; 0.67-1.06; superiority probability = 93.1%). For progression-free survival (39 trials, 11,825 patients), concurrent chemoradiotherapy outperformed radiotherapy and induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy but showed similar efficacy to immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations, adjuvant chemotherapy, or induction chemotherapy. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors ranked highest for both outcomes. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy remains more effective than radiotherapy alone or surgery and comparable to other combination strategies. These findings support it as the cornerstone of treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer while highlighting the promise of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based approaches.

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Abstract Background Paclitaxel and carboplatin is the standard chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. However, the benefit of adding programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors to chemotherapy is still unclear. Method We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials that investigated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We computed hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used DerSimonian and Laird random-effect models for all endpoints. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. R, version 4.2.3, was used for statistical analyses. Results A total of three studies and 1,431 patients were included. Compared with carboplatin plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) rate (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.23–0.44; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) at 30 months (RR 3.13; 95% CI 1.26–7.78; p = 0.01) were significant in favor of the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus carboplatin and paclitaxel group in the mismatch repair–deficient subgroup. However, there were no significant differences in the mismatch repair–proficient subgroup for PFS (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.50–1.08; p = 0.117) or OS at 30 months (RR 2.24; 95% CI 0.79–6.39; p = 0.13). Conclusion Immunotherapy plus carboplatin-paclitaxel increased significantly PFS and OS among patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, with a significant benefit in the mismatch repair–deficient and high microsatellite instability population.

2Works
2Papers
12Collaborators

Positions

2025–

Medical Oncologist

BC Cancer Agency · Medical Oncology