CCCanhui Cao
Papers(6)
Advances in cervical …Three-dimensional chr…HPV‐ …The exon 12‐containin…RAB2A promotes cervic…Multi‐omics data reve…
Collaborators(3)
Peng WuMiaochun XuYi Zhou
Institutions(2)
Huazhong University O…Imperial College Lond…

Papers

Advances in cervical cancer: current insights and future directions

Abstract In alignment with the World Health Organization's strategy to eliminate cervical cancer, substantial progress has been made in the treatment of this malignancy. Cervical cancer, largely driven by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, is considered preventable and manageable because of its well‐established etiology. Advancements in precision screening technologies, such as DNA methylation triage, HPV integration detection, liquid biopsies, and artificial intelligence‐assisted diagnostics, have augmented traditional screening methods such as HPV nucleic acid testing and cytology. Therapeutic strategies aimed at eradicating HPV and reversing precancerous lesions have been refined as pivotal measures for disease prevention. The controversy surrounding surgery for early‐stage cervical cancer revolves around identifying optimal candidates for minimally invasive and conservative procedures without compromising oncological outcomes. Recent clinical trials have yielded promising results for the development of systemic therapies for advanced cervical cancer. Immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody‐drug conjugates (ADCs), and targeted therapy have demonstrated significant effectiveness, marking a substantial advancement in cervical cancer management. Various combination therapies have been validated, and ongoing trials aim to enhance outcomes through the development of novel drugs and optimized combination regimens. The prospect of eradicating cervical cancer as the first malignancy to be eliminated is now within reach. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the latest scientific insights, with a particular focus on precision managements for various stages of cervical disease, and explore future research directions in cervical cancer.

Three-dimensional chromatin analysis reveals Sp1 as a mediator to program and reprogram HPV-host epigenetic architecture in cervical cancer

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is predominantly associated with HPV-related cancers, however, the precise mechanisms underlying the HPV-host epigenetic architectures in HPV carcinogenesis remain elusive. Here, we employed high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) to comprehensively map HPV16/18-host chromatin interactions. Our study identified the transcription factor Sp1 as a pivotal mediator in programming HPV-host interactions. By targeting Sp1, the active histone modifications (H3K27ac, H3K4me1, and H3K4me3) and the HPV-host chromatin interactions are reprogrammed, which leads to the downregulation of oncogenes located near the integration sites in both HPV (E6/E7) and the host genome (KLF5/MYC). Additionally, Sp1 inhibition led to the upregulation of immune checkpoint genes by reprogramming histone modifications in host cells. Notably, humanized patient-derived xenograft (PDX-HuHSC-NSG) models demonstrated that Sp1 inhibition promoted anti-PD-1 immunotherapy via remodeling the tumor immune microenvironment in cervical cancer. Moreover, single-cell transcriptomic analysis validated the enrichment of transcription factor Sp1 in epithelial cells of cervical cancer. In summary, our findings elucidate Sp1 as a key mediator involved in the programming and reprogramming of HPV-host epigenetic architecture. Inhibiting Sp1 with plicamycin may represent a promising therapeutic option for HPV-related carcinoma.

HPV‐ CCDC106 integration promotes cervical cancer progression by facilitating the high expression of CCDC106 after HPV E6 splicing

Abstract Human papillomavirus (HPV) integration and high expression of HPV oncogenes ( E6 and E7 ) are important mechanisms for HPV carcinogenesis in cervical cancer. However, the relationship between HPV integration and HPV E6 spliced transcripts, as well as the underlying mechanisms of HPV integration in carcinogenesis after HPV E6 splicing remains unclear. We analyzed HPV‐coiled‐coil domain containing 106 ( CCDC106 ) integration samples to characterize the roles of HPV integration, E6 spliceosome I (E6*I), and high CCDC106 expression in cervical carcinogenesis. We found that E6 was alternatively spliced into the E6*I transcript in HPV‐ CCDC016 integration samples with low p53 expression, in contrast to the role of E6*I in preventing p53 degradation in cervical cancer cells. In addition, CCDC106 was highly expressed after HPV‐ CCDC106 integration, and interacted with p53, resulting in p53 degradation and cervical cancer cell progression in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, when E6*I was highly expressed in cervical cancer cells, overexpression of CCDC106 independently degraded p53 and promoted cervical cancer cell progression. In this study, we explored the underlying mechanisms of HPV‐ CCDC106 integration in HPV carcinogenesis after HPV E6 splicing, which should provide insight into host genome dysregulation in cervical carcinogenesis.

The exon 12‐containing LHX6 isoforms promote cervical cancer cell proliferation by regulating the MAPK signaling pathway

AbstractLIM homeobox 6 (LHX6) has been reported to be downregulated and inhibits cell proliferation in various cancers. Alternative splicing of LHX6 leads to six annotated isoforms, which can be found in the NCBI database. However, the expression patterns and potential roles of these isoforms remain poorly characterized in cervical cancer. Here, we demonstrated that the LHX6 isoforms containing exon 12 (LHX6EX(+12) group) and isoforms lacking exon 12 (LHX6EX(–12) group) were differentially expressed in cervical tissue by qRT‐PCR. The mRNA expression level of LHX6EX(+12) group was higher than that of LHX6EX(−12) group in cervical cancer tissue. Knockdown of LHX6EX(+12) group and all LHX6 isoforms (LHX6All group) inhibited cell growth, increased cell apoptosis, and induced cell cycle arrest from G0/G1 phase to S phase in vitro. Consistently, overexpression of the LHX6EX(+12) group promoted cervical cancer cell proliferation in vitro. In contrast, no significant differences in cell proliferation were found between LHX6EX(−12) isoform knockdown group and its control. RNA‐sequencing suggested that the LHX6EX(+12) isoform group might exert its cancer‐promoting effects in cervical cancer via regulating MAPK signaling pathway. Downregulation of the LHX6EX(+12) group significantly suppressed the phosphorylation of MRK, ERK, JNK, and P38 at the protein level. We also identified some unique biological processes and signaling pathways in which each isoform group might be involved. In summary, our results indicated that LHX6EX(+12) isoform group was the dominant oncogenic type of LHX6 in cervical cancer, which may be a new biomarker and a potential precise therapeutic target for cervical cancer in the future.

Multi‐omics data reveals novel impacts of human papillomavirus integration on the epigenomic and transcriptomic signatures of cervical tumorigenesis

AbstractIntegration of human papilloma virus (HPV) DNA into the human genome may progressively contribute to cervical carcinogenesis. To explore how HPV integration affects gene expression by altering DNA methylation during carcinogenesis, we analyzed a multiomics dataset for cervical cancer. We obtained multiomics data by HPV‐capture sequencing, RNA sequencing, and Whole Genome Bisulfite Sequencing from 50 patients with cervical cancer. We detected 985 and 485 HPV‐integration sites in matched tumor and adjacent paratumor tissues. Of these, LINC00486 (n = 19), LINC02425 (n = 11), LLPH (n = 11), PROS1 (n = 5), KLF5 (n = 4), LINC00392 (n = 3), MIR205HG (n = 3) and NRG1 (n = 3) were identified as high‐frequency HPV‐integrated genes, including five novel recurrent genes. Patients at clinical stage II had the highest number of HPV integrations. E6 and E7 genes of HPV16 but not HPV18 showed significantly fewer breakpoints than random distribution. HPV integrations occurring in exons were associated with altered gene expression in tumor tissues but not in paratumor tissues. A list of HPV‐integrated genes regulated at transcriptomic or epigenetic level was reported. We also carefully checked the candidate genes with regulation pattern correlated in both levels. HPV fragments integrated at MIR205HG mainly came from the L1 gene of HPV16. RNA expression of PROS1 was downregulated when HPV integrated in its upstream region. RNA expression of MIR205HG was elevated when HPV integrated into its enhancer. The promoter methylation levels of PROS1 and MIR205HG were all negatively correlated with their gene expressions. Further experimental validations proved that upregulation of MIR205HG could promote the proliferative and migrative abilities of cervical cancer cells. Our data provides a new atlas for epigenetic and transcriptomic regulations regarding HPV integrations in cervical cancer genome. We demonstrate that HPV integration may affect gene expression by altering methylation levels of MIR205HG and PROS1. Our study provides novel biological and clinical insights into HPV‐induced cervical cancer.

6Papers
3Collaborators