C Acuti Martellucci

Human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness within a cervical cancer screening programme: cohort study

ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of an HPV vaccination programme in reducing the risk of cervical abnormalities identified at subsequent screening.DesignRetrospective cohort study using administrative health data.SettingGeneral population of Ferrara Province, Italy.PopulationFemale residents born in 1986–1993 and participating in the organized cervical screening programme in 2011–2018, who were eligible for HPV vaccination in catch‐up cohorts.MethodsLogistic regression to evaluate the potential association between abnormal cervical cytology and one, two, three or at least one dose of HPV vaccine.Main outcome measuresCervical abnormalities, as predicted by low‐grade or high‐grade cytology, by number of vaccine doses, stratified by age.ResultsThe sample consisted of 7785 women (mean age 27.5 years, SD 2.3). Overall, 391 (5.0%) were vaccinated with ≥1 dose and 893 (11.5%) had abnormal cytology. Women receiving at least one vaccine dose were significantly less likely to have an abnormal cytology (adjusted odds ratio 0.52; 95% confidence interval 0.34–0.79). Similar results were observed for women receiving a single dose, for both bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines, and applying buffer periods (excluding cytological outcomes within 1 month, 6 months and 1 year of the first dose).ConclusionsIn the context of an organised cervical screening programme in Italy, catch‐up HPV vaccination almost halved the risk of cytological abnormalities.Tweetable abstractAmong Ferrara women, vaccination against human papillomavirus halved the risk of screening cervical abnormalities.

Cervical screening in Western Kazakhstan: Liquid-based cytology ‘Cell Scan’ versus azur-eosin staining

Objective To assess the effectiveness of the current cervical cancer screening tools in Western Kazakhstan. Methods Smears taken through (i) conventional cytology using azur-eosin staining and (ii) liquid-based cytology (LBC) ‘Cell Scan’ in the general female population and in women first diagnosed with cervical cancer were collected throughout the region. ROC-analysis with curve construction and weighted Cohen's κ calculation were applied. A total of 494 cytological pairs were collected, including 94 sets with histology findings. Results The conventional (azur-eosin staining) technique contained 0.2% non-informative material and LBC ‘Cell Scan’ had 5.9%. Area under the curve was 0.95 for the conventional technique and 0.92 for ‘Cell Scan’ ( p > 0.05). The conventional smears showed κ 0.62, sensitivity 90.4% at specificity 90.0% for CIN2+, while LBC ‘Cell Scan’ smears showed κ 0.47, sensitivity 83.3% at specificity 92.5%. Conclusions In this analysis it was not possible to prove that the LBC ‘Cell Scan’ technique was superior to its predecessor, azur-eosin staining. These findings highlight the need to modify the current screening programme according to updated international scientific evidence on effective screening design, such as the use of HPV DNA testing with Pap smear triage in women aged 30 or older. Further research, and a Health Technology Assessment, are necessary if we wish to establish a national standardized screening programme using the available technology appropriately.

Delivering cervical cancer screening during the COVID-19 emergency

Impact of a Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Program within Organized Cervical Cancer Screening: Cohort Study

Abstract Background: We assessed the effectiveness of an HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccination program in lowering cervical abnormality risk, and conferring herd protection. Methods: Retrospective cohort study using linked screening and vaccination administrative health data of the general population of Ancona Province, Italy. We included all female residents born in 1990–1993, eligible for catch-up HPV vaccination up to age 25 years, and adhering to organized screening in 2015–2020 (n = 4,665). Cervical abnormalities rates were compared between: Vaccinated and unvaccinated women, and cohorts with high and low vaccination uptake. Analyses were adjusted for age, country of birth, screening tests number, laboratory, and municipality average income. Main outcomes were ASC-US+ or LSIL+ Pap smears, and CIN1+ or CIN2+ histology. Results: Mean screening age was 26.6±1.5 years, and 1,118 screened women (24.0%) were vaccinated (mean vaccination age 19.2±1.5 years). The diagnosed cervical abnormalities were: 107 LSIL+ (2.3%), 70 CIN1+ (1.5%), and 35 CIN2+ (0.8%). The adjusted odds ratios of LSIL+, CIN1+, and CIN2+ among vaccinated versus unvaccinated women were, respectively: 0.55 [(95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33–0.91)], 0.43 (95% CI, 0.22–0.86), and 0.31 (95% CI, 0.11–0.91). Among the unvaccinated, those in the highest-uptake (45.3%) 1993 cohort, versus the last pre-vaccination 1990 cohort, showed AORs of LSIL+ and CIN1+ of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.10–0.50), and 0.22 (95% CI, 0.07–0.69), respectively. Conclusions: In the first evaluation from Central Italy, catch-up HPV vaccination considerably reduced the risk of all cervical abnormalities diagnosed within organized screening, and conferred an elevated degree of herd protection among unvaccinated women. Impact: The high protection conferred by HPV vaccination suggests the need to update cervical screening.