Byoung-Gie Kim

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Dual Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer: Final Analysis of TRU-D Phase II Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Abstract Purpose: This open-label, investigator-initiated, phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety, survival, and neoadjuvant outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with dual immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients and Methods: Between June 2019 and July 2021, 45 patients with unresectable stage III to IV EOC were enrolled. The patients received three cycles of NAC combined with durvalumab and tremelimumab. All patients underwent interval debulking surgery and received three cycles of durvalumab and adjuvant chemotherapy, followed by 12 cycles of durvalumab as maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint was the 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate; the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate after NAC, a chemotherapy response score, pathologic complete response, overall survival, and safety. The preplanned exploratory analyses assessed the lymphocyte infiltration, PD-L1 expression, and genomic profiles of pretreatment tumors. Results: The 12-month PFS rate was 65.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 52.8–not estimated (NE)], whereas the 24- and 30-month PFS rates were 38.6% (95% CI, 26.7–NE) and 36.4% (95% CI, 24.7–NE), respectively. After NAC, the objective response rate was 86.7%, whereas 14 patients (31.1%) had a chemotherapy response score of three, and five (11.1%) achieved pathologic complete response. The 30-month overall survival rate was 87.7%. The most common grade ≥3 adverse event was neutropenia (26.7%). In an exploratory analysis, patients with pre-NAC tumors showing PD-L1 (combined positive score) ≥1, high Mutation Signature 3, and a high extracellular matrix signature demonstrated improved PFS outcomes. Conclusions: NAC combined with dual immune checkpoint inhibitors is feasible for advanced-stage EOC and shows promising activity with a durable clinical response.

Stratifying the risk of ovarian cancer incidence by histologic subtypes in the Korean Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Study (Ko‐EVE)

AbstractIntroductionThis study aimed to verify the association between ovarian cancer (OC) and reproductive‐ and lifestyle‐related risk factors stratified by the subtype of OC.MethodsIn this matched case–control study derived from the Korean epithelial ovarian cancer study (Ko‐EVE), we calculated the risk of OC subtypes using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) in a logistic regression model.ResultsAs a result of matching, 531 cases and 2,124 controls were selected. Smoking had positive association with high‐grade serous (HGS) OC (OR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.15–6.30), whereas alcohol consumption had positive association with mucinous type (MUC) (OR = 3.63, 95% CI = 1.39–9.49). Obesity (≥30 kg/m2) was associated with clear cell type (CLC) (OR = 4.57, 95% CI = 1.06–19.77). Spontaneous abortion was negatively associated with CLC (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.13–0.90), in contrast to HGS (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.96–2.15). Tubal ligation, hysterectomy, and oophorectomy were associated with decreased risk of HGS (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.05–0.39; OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.07–0.73; OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.08–0.97, respectively). Early menarche was strongly associated with increased risk of CLC, but not MUC (OR = 6.11, 95% CI = 1.53–24.42; OR = 3.23, 95% CI = 0.98–10.86). Further, childbirth (≥2 times) was negatively associated with endometrioid type OC and CLC (OR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.04–0.35; OR = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.02–0.37, respectively). Oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy were negatively associated with OC (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.40–0.93; OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.32–0.80, respectively), and similar negative associations were also observed in HGS (OR = 0.69; OR = 0.60, respectively). Associations between family history of breast cancer and OC, regular exercise (≥5/week), and artificial abortion and OC were similar across all subtypes (OR = 3.92; OR = 0.41; OR = 0.72, respectively).ConclusionA heterogeneous association between some risk factors and the incidence of each subtype of epithelial OC was observed, suggesting that the carcinogenic mechanisms of each subtype may be partly different.

Significance of HPV status on tumor response and treatment outcomes in endocervical adenocarcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study

We aimed to compare tumor response and treatment outcomes between human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated (HPVA) and HPV-independent (HPVI) endocervical adenocarcinomas (ADCs) treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and to identify prognostic factors. We conducted a retrospective review of 40 patients with endocervical ADCs treated with definitive CCRT (stages I-IVA) between 2011 and 2022. Based on pathological review the cases were categorized as HPVA or HPVI ADCs. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the characteristics, complete response (CR) rates, and survival outcomes. Of 40 patients, 22 (55.0%) had HPVA and 18 (45.0%) had HPVI ADCs. HPVI patients had significantly higher rates of parametrial invasion (94.4% vs. 45.5%, p=0.001). CR was achieved in 57.5% of patients and was significantly more common in the HPVA group (81.8% vs. 27.8%, p=0.001). Patients with HPVI had higher recurrence rates (88.9% vs. 50.0%, p=0.016) and lower 3-year progression-free survival (PFS, 16.7% vs. 49.8%, p=0.001), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, 38.1% vs. 80.8%, p=0.001), and overall survival (OS, 42.3% vs. 90.7%, p=0.002) rates. HPVA remained a significant factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.09-10.81; p=0.035) and OS rates (HR=6.83; 95% CI=1.17-39.80; p=0.033) in multivariate analysis. HPVI ADC was associated with a lower response to definitive CCRT and worse prognosis than HPVA ADC. These findings suggest the need for tailored treatment strategies based on the HPV status.

Survival Effects of Cytoreductive Surgery for Refractory Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Salvage second-line chemotherapy is usually recommended for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC) who develop progressive disease (PD) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Herein, we investigated the role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for such patients. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 36 patients with AEOC who developed PD after receiving NAC at two tertiary academic centers with different treatment strategies between 2001 and 2016. Patients who developed PD after NAC were consistently treated with CRS at one hospital (group A; n=13) and second-line chemotherapy at another (group B; n=23). The clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between the groups. Overall survival (OS) was longer in group A than in group B (19.4 months vs. 7.9 months; CRS may result in a survival benefit even in patients with AEOC who develop PD after NAC.

A single-arm, phase II study of niraparib and bevacizumab maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer patients previously treated with a PARP inhibitor: Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG 3056)/NIRVANA-R trial

Given the expanding clinical use of poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis), there is a significant need for optimal strategies with which to treat patients whose cancer progresses while using a PARPi. However, the treatment consensus after PARPi has not been established. The aim of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) 3056/NIRVANA-R trial is to investigate the efficacy of niraparib in combination with bevacizumab as a maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients who were previously treated with a PARPi. The KGOG 3056/NIRVANA-R is a multi-centre, investigator-initiated, single-arm, phase II trial of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer recruited from seven KGOG sites. This study included patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who received at least 2 previous courses of platinum-containing therapy and had been treated with a PARPi. Mucinous histology type was excluded. Patients who had responded to the last platinum regimen (either complete or partial response) were eligible to participate in this study. Forty-four patients will be recruited. All enrolled patients are treated with niraparib and bevacizumab for maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of patient consent. The primary endpoint of the study is 6-month progression-free survival rate. Accrual is expected to be completed in 2022, followed by presentation of results in 2023. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04734665.

A single-arm phase II study of olaparib maintenance with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab in BRCA non-mutated patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (OPEB-01)

The optimal treatment of ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04361370, Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0005144.

Biomarker-guided targeted therapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (AMBITION; KGOG 3045): a multicentre, open-label, five-arm, uncontrolled, umbrella trial

Management of heavily pre-treated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer remains a therapeutic challenge. Outcomes are poor with non-platinum, single-agent chemotherapy (CT); however, molecularly targeted anticancer therapies provide new options. This open-label, investigator-initiated, phase 2 umbrella trial (NCT03699449) enrolled patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (at least 2 prior lines of CT and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0/1) to receive combination therapy based on homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status determined by archival tumour sample assessment. HRD-positive patients were randomised to either olaparib 200mg bid tablet + cediranib 30mg qd (arm 1) or olaparib 300mg bid tablet + durvalumab 1,500mg q4w (arm 2). HRD-negative patients were allocated to either durvalumab 1,500 mg q4w + pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or topotecan or weekly paclitaxel (6 cycles; arm 3, those with PD-L1 expression) or durvalumab 1,500 mg q4w + tremelimumab 75mg q4w (4 doses) + PLD or topotecan or weekly paclitaxel (4 cycles; arm 4, those without PD-L1 expression). Arm 5 (durvalumab 1,500 mg q4w + tremelimumab 300mg [1 dose] + weekly paclitaxel [60 mg/m² D1,8,15 q4w for 4 cycles] was initiated after arm 4 completed. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1). Between Dec 2018 and Oct 2020, 70 patients (median 57 years; median 3 prior treatment lines [range 2-10]) were treated (n=16, 14, 5, 18, and 17, respectively). Overall ORR was 37.1% (26/70, 95% confidence interval=25.9, 49.5); 2 achieved complete response. ORR was 50%, 42.9%, 20%, 33.3%, and 29.4%, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 37.5%, 35.7%, 20%, 66.7%, and 35.3% of patients, respectively. No TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation and no grade 5 TRAEs were observed. This study, the first biomarker-driven umbrella trial in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer, suggests clinical utility with biomarker-driven targeted therapy. All treatment combinations were manageable, and without unexpected toxicities. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03699449.

Significance of serum CA125 level in surgically resected cervical adenocarcinoma with adverse features

Unlike cervical squamous cell carcinoma, there are no consensus criteria for serum tumor markers in cervical adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to identify the prognostic value of preoperative carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) levels in cervical adenocarcinoma patients with adverse pathologic features. A total of 105 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiation therapy were included. Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. Using a cutoff value of 50 U/mL, 83 and 22 patients had low- and high-CA125, respectively. Patients with high-CA125 had a larger tumor size, more frequent parametrial extension, and more frequent lymph node metastasis than those with low-CA125. During a median follow-up of 59.3 (interquartile range, 32.7-97.8) months, patients with high-CA125 showed inferior 5-year LRFS, DMFS, and OS rates compared to those with low-CA125 (38.5% vs. 70.0%; 37.0% vs. 69.4%; 43.6% vs. 78.1%, respectively, all p<0.05). In multivariable analysis, the high-CA125 remained significant prognostic factor for LRFS, DMFS, and OS (all p<0.05). Furthermore, 12 patients with high-CA125 at recurrence exhibited lower 5-year OS rates than 21 patients with low-CA125 at recurrence (0.0% vs. 51.3%, p=0.003). In this retrospective analysis, the serum CA125 level at diagnosis and recurrence was related to the extent of disease and prognosis of cervical adenocarcinoma with adverse pathologic features. A CA125 level of ≥50 U/mL may be a prognostic surrogate marker for cervical adenocarcinoma in patients with the presence of adverse factors.

Predicting prognosis according to the updated WHO classification in patients with endocervical adenocarcinoma treated with surgery and radiotherapy

The recently updated World Health Organization classification divides endocervical adenocarcinomas (ADCs) into human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated (HPVA) and HPV-independent (HPVI) ADCs. This study aimed to investigate the differences in the clinical features and treatment outcomes between patients with HPVA and HPVI. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records and pathology slides of 123 patients with endocervical ADC who underwent radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy. Tumor characteristics, patterns of failure, and survival outcomes were compared between HPVA and HPVI ADCs. Eighty-one (65.9%) and 42 (34.1%) patients were diagnosed with HPVA and HPVI ADCs, respectively. HPVI ADC showed more frequent positive vaginal resection margin (VRM) and peritoneal seeding than HPVA ADC. After a median follow-up of 58.1 months, local recurrence and distant metastasis were more frequently observed in HPVI ADC than in HPVA ADC. Both local recurrence-free survival (77.3% vs. 91.8%) and distant metastasis-free survival (50.1% vs. 73.7%) rates of HPVI ADC were lower than those of HPVA ADC. Disease-free survival was not significantly different between HPVI and HPVA ADCs. We demonstrated that HPVI ADC exhibited higher rates of VRM involvement and peritoneal seeding than those of HPVA ADC, resulting in higher rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Further studies with larger populations are warranted to explore optimal treatment strategies based on the histological subtypes of endocervical ADC.

Phase II randomized study of first-line carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with pembrolizumab, followed by maintenance pembrolizumab alone or with nesuparib, in mismatch-repair proficient, advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (PENELOPE).

Although recent clinical trials proved survival benefit from the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy, treatment of mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (arEC) is challenging. As poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors enhance the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors when combined, improvement of survival is expected by dual maintenance in this population. The PENELOPE trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of dual maintenance with nesuparib, an orally active PARP1/2 and tankyrase 1/2 inhibitor, and pembrolizumab after paclitaxel/carboplatin plus pembrolizumab (TCP) treatment in patients with pMMR arEC. In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-comparative phase II trial, patients with pMMR arEC, naïve to first-line chemotherapy, will be enrolled. Six patients will be enrolled in stage 1 (safety run-in) and treated with TCP for 6 cycles followed by dual maintenance with nesuparib and pembrolizumab. The study will proceed to stage 2 (dose expansion) if less than 33% of patients in stage 1 experience a dose-limiting toxicity. Otherwise, additional patients will be enrolled in stage 1 at a lower dose level. In stage 2, 80 patients will be randomized (1:1) to: arm A) TCP followed by maintenance with pembrolizumab; arm B) TCP followed by dual maintenance with nesuparib and pembrolizumab. Patients are planned to receive maintenance treatment up to 14 cycles every 6 weeks. Primary endpoint is investigator-assessed progression-free survival (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1) of each arm vs. historical control, which is the placebo arm for pMMR patients in the NRG-GY018 study, and key secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, and safety. Enrollment began in Q4 2024. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06502743.

Analysis of East Asia subgroup in Study 309/KEYNOTE-775: lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician’s choice chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer

In the global phase 3 Study 309/KEYNOTE-775 (NCT03517449) at the first interim analysis, lenvatinib+pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) versus treatment of physician's choice chemotherapy (TPC) in patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). This exploratory analysis evaluated outcomes in patients enrolled in East Asia at the time of prespecified final analysis. Women ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced, recurrent, or metastatic EC with progressive disease after 1 platinum-based chemotherapy (2 if 1 given in neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting) were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks (≤35 cycles) or TPC (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). Primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS. No alpha was assigned for this subgroup analysis. Among 155 East Asian patients (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab, n=77; TPC, n=78), median follow-up time (data cutoff: March 1, 2022) was 34.3 (range, 25.1-43.0) months. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab vs. TPC) were 0.74 (0.49-1.10) and 0.64 (0.44-0.94) in the mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and all-comer populations, respectively. HRs (95% CI) for OS were 0.68 (0.45-1.02) and 0.61 (0.41-0.90), respectively. ORRs were 36% with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab and 22% with TPC (pMMR) and 39% and 21%, respectively (all-comers). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97% and 96% (grade 3-5, 74% and 72%), respectively. Lenvatinib+pembrolizumab provided clinically meaningful benefit with manageable safety compared with TPC, supporting its use in East Asian patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent EC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03517449.

Niraparib and Bevacizumab Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Patients Previously Treated With a PARP Inhibitor

This study is phase II, open label, clinical trial to determine the efficacy of Niraparib re-treatment with Bevacizumab of assessment progression-free survival(6 months PFS rate) with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients previously treated with a PARP inhibitor.

Olaparib Maintenance With Pembrolizumab & Bevacizumab in BRCA Non-mutated Patients With Platinum-sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

This study is phase II, open label, clinical trial to determine the efficacy of Olaparib maintenance with Bevacizumab and Pembrolizumab by assessment progression-free survival(6 months PFS rate) in BRCA non-mutated patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

An uMbrella Study of BIomarker-driven Targeted Therapy In Patients With Platinum-resistant Recurrent OvariaN Cancer(AMBITION)

This study is a pilot study of biomarker-driven targeted therapy in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. More specifically, this is a randomized, multi-center, open label, phase II study for Homologous Recombination Deficiency(HRD)+ patients and a biomarker-driven multiple-arm phase II study for Homologous Recombination Deficiency(HRD)- patients. This study will consist of a number of study modules (substudies), each evaluating the antitumor activity of targeted agents in patients whose tumors express specific phenotype relevant to the molecules under investigation.