Investigator

Bernadette A. M. Heemskerk‐Gerritsen

Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology

BAMBernadette A. M. …
Papers(2)
Recurrent postmenopau…Progression-free surv…
Collaborators(5)
Helena C. van DoornJohanna A. van der Za…Laura D. P. R. van Ma…Patricia C. Ewing‐Gra…Antoinette Hollestelle
Institutions(2)
Erasmus Mc Cancer Ins…Erasmus Mc

Papers

Recurrent postmenopausal bleeding: Pathological findings and predictive factors. A multicenter, prospective, observational study

AbstractIntroductionRecurrent postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) occurs in 6%–25% of postmenopausal women who have experienced a previous episode of PMB. The question of whether recurrent PMB leads to a higher risk of endometrial cancer (EC) in comparison to a single episode of PMB is, however, controversial. Furthermore, little is known about predictive factors for recurrent PMB.Material and MethodsA multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted over a 5‐year period in four hospitals in the Netherlands. Women with PMB undergoing endometrial sampling and aged 40 years and older were included. Occurrence of recurrent PMB was retrospectively determined. Primary outcomes included (1) the incidence of recurrent PMB and (2) differences in pathological findings between patients with a single episode vs recurrent PMB. Secondary outcomes included (1) the association between diagnosis of benign polyps at first PMB and pathological findings at recurrent PMB and (2) factors predictive for recurrent PMB.ResultsA total of 437 women with PMB were included, of whom 360 were at risk of recurrent PMB. With a median follow‐up of 61 months (IQR (Interquartile range) 44–73), 26.4% experienced recurrent PMB. Patients with recurrent PMB were more often diagnosed with benign polyps (34.7% vs. 25.1%, p‐value 0.015) and less frequently with a malignancy (5.3% vs. 17.8%, p‐value 0.015), compared to patients with a single episode of PMB. Benign polyps at initial PMB were not associated with a (pre)malignancy at recurrence (OR 4.16, 95% CI 0.75–23.03). Predictive factors for recurrent PMB included use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.64–6.72), and benign polyps at initial PMB (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.07–3.04).ConclusionsRecurrent PMB is common in women with a previous episode of PMB. Compared to patients with a single episode of PMB, patients with recurrent PMB and benign histological outcomes at accurate workup during their first episode were less often diagnosed with malignancies and more frequently with benign polyps. Benign polyps at first PMB are predictive for recurrent PMB, but not for a higher risk of (pre)malignancy.

Progression-free survival and overall survival after BRCA1/2-associated epithelial ovarian cancer: A matched cohort study

Introduction Germline BRCA1/2-associated epithelial ovarian cancer has been associated with better progression-free survival and overall survival than sporadic epithelial ovarian cancer, but conclusive data are lacking. Methods We matched 389 BRCA1-associated and 123 BRCA2-associated epithelial ovarian cancer patients 1:1 to sporadic epithelial ovarian cancer patients on year of birth, year of diagnosis, and FIGO stage (< = IIA/> = IIB). Germline DNA test was performed before or after epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis. All patients received chemotherapy. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the associations between mutation status (BRCA1 or BRCA2 versus sporadic) and progression-free survival and overall survival. To investigate whether DNA testing after epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis resulted in survival bias, we performed additional analyses limited to BRCA1/2-associated epithelial ovarian cancer patients with a DNA test result before cancer diagnosis (n = 73 BRCA1; n = 9 BRCA2) and their matched sporadic controls. Results The median follow-up was 4.4 years (range 0.1–30.1). During the first three years after epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis, progression-free survival was better for BRCA1 (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74–1.04) and BRCA2 (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41–0.81) patients than for sporadic patients. Overall survival was better during the first six years after epithelial ovarian cancer for BRCA1 (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.58–0.84) and BRCA2 (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.29–0.59) patients. After surviving these years, survival benefits disappeared or were in favor of the sporadic patients. Conclusion For epithelial ovarian cancer patients who received chemotherapy, we confirmed survival benefit for BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline pathogenic variant carriers. This may indicate higher sensitivity to chemotherapy, both in first line treatment and in the recurrent setting. The observed benefit appears to be limited to a relatively short period after epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis.

10Works
2Papers
5Collaborators

Positions

Researcher

Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · Department of Medical Oncology