Investigator

Bengul Gokbayrak

Postdoctoral Research Fellow · University of British Columbia, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

BGBengul Gokbayrak
Papers(2)
Prognostic values of …Shifted assembly and …
Collaborators(10)
Yemin WangCigall KadochDavid G HuntsmanDavid L KolinDerek ChiuFelix K F KommossGrace D. XuJason L HornickJessica N McAlpineJoao A. Paulo
Institutions(6)
University Of British…Harvard UniversityBrigham and Women's H…University of British…University Hospital H…Unknown Institution

Papers

Prognostic values of molecular subtypes and SWI/SNF protein expression in de‐differentiated/undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma

AimsClassification and risk stratification of endometrial carcinoma (EC) has transitioned from histopathological features to molecular classification, e.g. the ProMisE classifier, identifying four prognostic subtypes: POLE mutant (POLEmut) with almost no recurrence or disease‐specific death events, mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) and no specific molecular profile (NSMP), with intermediate outcome and p53 abnormal (p53abn) with poor outcomes. However, the applicability of molecular classification is unclear in rare but aggressive histotypes of EC, e.g. de‐differentiated and undifferentiated endometrial cancers (DD/UDEC). Here, we aim to assembled a cohort of DD/UDEC from a single institution and analysed the prognostic significance of ProMisE molecular subtypes and the expression of SWItch/sucrose non‐fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodelling complex members, previously implicated in the pathogenesis of DD/UDEC.Methods and resultsWe accrued 88 DD/UDEC cases, assessed POLE status by Sanger sequencing and performed immunohistochemistry for p53, mismatch repair and SWI/SNF proteins on the tissue microarrays assembled. Assignment of molecular subtypes was possible in 80 tumours; POLE sequencing failed in the remaining eight cases. There were 12 (15%) POLEmut, 44 (55%) MMRd, 14 (17.5%) p53abn and 10 (12.5%) NSMP DD/UDEC. POLEmut DD/UDECs had excellent outcomes, but the other three molecular subtypes all had poor outcomes, with no significant differences among them. The loss of one or more SWI/SNF proteins [AT‐rich interactive domain‐containing protein 1A (ARID1A), ARID1B, SWI/SNF‐related, matrix‐associated, actin‐dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 4 (SMARCA4), SMARCA2], observed in 66% (55 of 83) cases, was not of prognostic significance.ConclusionsThese results indicate that all molecular subtypes of DD/UDEC except POLEmut behave in an aggressive fashion. Further study is needed to determine whether these molecular alterations can be targeted with adjuvant therapy, in order to improve outcomes of patients with DD/UDEC.

9Works
2Papers
18Collaborators
Endometrial NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Positions

2022–

Postdoctoral Research Fellow

University of British Columbia · Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

2022–

Postdoctoral Research Fellow

University of British Columbia · Urological Sciences

Education

2022

PhD Candidate

Koç Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri ve Mühendislik Enstitüsü · Molecular Biology

2020

Visiting PhD Student

Vancouver Prostate Centre