Atsushi Murakami

Laparoscopic resection surgery for malignant transformation of extragonadal endometriosis by the “pincer” approach

Up to 1% of women with endometriosis develop endometriosis-associated neoplasms [1]. Most endometriosis-associated malignant tumors develop from the ovarian endometriomas, whereas those developing from extragonadal lesions are extremely rare, estimated at 0.2% [2]. Because they are uncommon, a treatment protocol for the malignant transformation of extragonadal endometriosis lesions has not been clearly defined. When the lesion is confined to the site of origin and R0 resection is achieved, the 5-year survival rate is between 82% and 100%; therefore, complete resection should be performed [3]. The patient in this video had previously undergone hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, left nephrectomy, and low-anterior resection of the rectum due to severe endometriosis. Ten years after the surgery, the patient had a 6 cm endometrioid adenocarcinoma developing from the residual endometriosis lesion at the left uterosacral ligament that involved the bladder, left ureter, and rectum. In this case, the tumor was attached to the pelvis due to infiltration of the left sacrospinous ligament. To completely remove the tumor, we used laterally extended endopelvic resection with abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. We used the laparoscopic-perineal-laparoscopic approach (pincer approach) because improved visualization of the left sacrospinous ligament increases the probability of achieving complete resection [4]. Pathological R0 resection was achieved without intraoperative or postoperative complications. Thus, for tumors that are firmly attached to the pelvic floor, the pincer approach can be useful for achieving R0 resection. The informed consent for use of this video was taken from the patient.

Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review

Radical hysterectomy is a standard surgery to treat early-stage uterine cervical cancer. The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial has shown that patients receiving minimally invasive radical hysterectomy have a poorer prognosis than those receiving open radical hysterectomy; however, the reason for this remains unclear. The LACC trial had 2 concerns: the learning curve and the procedural effects. Appropriate management of the learning curve effect, including surgeons' skills, is required to correctly interpret the result of surgical randomized controlled trials. Whether the LACC trial managed the learning curve effect remains controversial, based on the surgeons' inclusion criteria and the distribution of institutions with recurrent cases. An appropriate surgical procedure is also needed, and avoiding intraoperative cancer cell spillage plays an important role during cancer surgery. Cancer cell spillage during minimally invasive surgery to treat cervical cancer is caused by several factors, including 1) exposure of tumor, 2) the use of a uterine manipulator, and 3) direct handling of the uterine cervix. Unfortunately, these issues were not addressed by the LACC trial. We evaluated the results of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy while avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer. Our findings show that avoiding cancer cell spillage during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy may ensure an equivalent oncologic outcome, comparable to that of open radical hysterectomy. Therefore, evaluating the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage during minimally invasive surgery with a better control of the learning curve and procedural effects is needed.

Influence of COVID‐19 on the clinical characteristics of patients with uterine cervical cancer in Japan: A single‐center retrospective study

AbstractAimThis study investigated the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) on the clinical characteristics and interregional movement of patients with uterine cervical cancer.MethodsThis study included 1189 patients who underwent treatment for cervical cancer, including cervical intraepithelial neoplasm and adenocarcinoma in situ, at our hospital in Tokyo, Japan, in 2017–2018 and in 2021, before and after the pandemic, respectively. The patients' clinical information was compared during both periods. The clinical stage was unified using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2008 staging.ResultsThe number of patients treated for cervical cancer was 355, 420, and 414 in 2017, 2018, and 2021, respectively. The percentage of invasive carcinomas significantly increased from 158 (44.5%) and 196 (46.7%) to 219 (52.9%) (p = 0.049). In all periods, no significant differences were observed in median age, histological type, and treatment. The proportions of FIGO Stage IA1 were significantly elevated from 3.9% and 3.8% to 11.4% (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients from prefectures other than Tokyo significantly increased from 34.9% to 40.8% (p = 0.049). Furthermore, the proportion of patients with invasive carcinoma in private clinics increased from 28.0% to 37.9% (p = 0.014).ConclusionsThe number of patients with invasive carcinoma and the percentage of patients with invasive carcinoma referred from private clinics increased, indicating that the COVID‐19 pandemic influenced patients to delay consultations. Furthermore, the surge in patients from other prefectures indicates that medical resources were more limited in rural areas, another impact of COVID‐19.