Atsushi Kihara

Expression of glypican-3, SALL4, and CD34 in undifferentiated endometrial carcinomas

H3K27me3 deficiency in dedifferentiated carcinoma and carcinosarcoma of the endometrium

The present study immunohistochemically investigated trimethylation of lysine 27 of histone 3 (H3K27me3) expression in 769 endometrial carcinomas and 196 uterine mesenchymal tumors. One dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (DEC) and one carcinosarcoma showed H3K27me3 deficiency that was limited to undifferentiated and sarcomatous components, respectively. Switch/sucrose nonfermenting (SWI/SNF) complex subunits (SMARCA4, SMARCB1, and ARID1A/1B) and mismatch repair proteins were proficient in both tumors. The dimethylation of H3K27 (H3K27me2) was deficient in the undifferentiated component, whereas the sarcomatous component had scattered H3K27me2-positive cells. CXorf67, which inhibits PRC2 function, was diffusely expressed in the sarcomatous component. CXorf67 was negative in the undifferentiated component, which was submitted to a genetic analysis and showed no alterations in PRC2 core subunits or H3K27. The present results suggest H3K27 methylation dysregulation as a cause of SWI/SNF-proficient DEC and carcinosarcoma and imply differences in their level of and the mechanisms underlying H3K27 methylation dysregulation.

ZEB1 expression is frequently detected in undifferentiated and de‐differentiated carcinomas, but is not specific among endometrial carcinomas

AimsThe pathological diagnosis of undifferentiated and de‐differentiated endometrial carcinomas (UC/DCs) is prognostically important. However, undifferentiated components may be confused with other subtypes, particularly grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas (G3ECs). Zinc finger E‐box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) has recently been identified as a promising marker because it is frequently expressed in the undifferentiated components of UC/DCs, but not in other carcinomas. Therefore, we herein evaluated the diagnostic utility of ZEB1 with an emphasis on distinguishing between UC/DCs and G3ECs using an expanded cohort of endometrial carcinomas and carcinosarcomas.Methods and resultsImmunostaining for ZEB1 was performed on whole‐tissue sections of 19 UC/DCs, 194 non‐UC/DC endometrial carcinomas and 29 carcinosarcomas. Staining was defined as negative (< 5%), focal (5–50%) and diffuse expression (> 50%). ZEB1 was expressed in 84% of the undifferentiated components of UC/DCs (diffuse in 14, focal in two). Focal expression was observed in eight non‐UC/DC endometrial carcinomas and diffuse expression in seven, with the latter comprising G3ECs (four of 76), serous carcinoma (one of 37), clear cell carcinoma (one of 21) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (one of three). Epithelial differentiation was morphologically and immunohistochemically less evident in G3ECs and neuroendocrine carcinoma with diffuse ZEB1 expression. All carcinosarcomas showed diffuse ZEB1 expression in their sarcomatous components.ConclusionImmunostaining for ZEB1 was sufficiently sensitive to detect undifferentiated components. Diffuse ZEB1 expression showed high specificity for distinguishing between undifferentiated components and G3ECs; however, ZEB1 expression was not entirely specific to UC/DCs. The integration of ZEB1 into the diagnosis of UC/DCs requires careful examination to exclude other tumours, such as less differentiated G3ECs, neuroendocrine carcinomas and carcinosarcomas.