Antonio Lembo

Outcomes of low-risk endometrial cancer with isolated tumor cells in the sentinel lymph nodes: a prospective, multi-center, single-arm, observational study (ENDO-ITC study)

It is unclear whether isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) adversely affect prognosis, especially in low-risk endometrial cancer. In a retrospective study, we showed a worse recurrence-free survival for low-risk endometrial cancer with ITCs than the node-negative group. Our aim is to evaluate whether the likelihood of disease recurrence differs between a prospective cohort of patients with low-risk endometrial cancer with ITCs and an historical cohort with negative SLNs. We hypothesize that patients with low-risk endometrial cancer and ITCs will have a worse recurrence-free survival than patients who are node-negative. This is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm observational study. Consecutive patients with low-risk endometrial cancer with ITCs in the SLNs will be accrued. Observation only will be suggested after surgery. We will include patients with endometrial cancer undergoing pelvic SLN biopsy and ultra-staging with the following characteristics: endometrioid histology, grades 1 to 2, <50% myometrial invasion, without substantial/extensive lympho-vascular space invasion. ITCs in SLNs are defined as tumor cell aggregates ≤0.2 mm or <200 cells. The primary end point is recurrence-free survival, measured from the date of surgery to the date of recurrence, death, or last disease evaluation. With a sample size of 132 women with low-risk endometrial cancer and ITCs, a 1-sided log-rank test achieves 85% power at a 0.05 significance level to detect an HR of 2.1. The expected number of events during the study is 17.3. The study duration will be 60 months: 24 for enrollment and 36 for follow-up. The results are expected in 2029. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06689956.

Oncological outcomes of unexpected uterine leiomyosarcoma: A single‐center retrospective analysis of 5528 consecutive hysterectomies

AbstractBackground and MethodsUterine leiomyosarcomas (uLMS) are rare malignant tumors, often incidentally discovered, with an estimated annual incidence of five cases per one million women in the United States. This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of two groups of patients: those with uLMS incidentally found during surgery and those who underwent surgery due to suspected or confirmed uLMS before the procedure. The study assessed patients who had undergone hysterectomy and were diagnosed with stage I uLMS at a tertiary gynecologic oncology referral center in Italy between January 2000 and December 2019. Data on patients' baseline characteristics, surgical procedures, and oncological outcomes were collected. The patients were classified into two groups based on whether uLMS was unexpectedly discovered or suspected before the surgery. Survival rates and factors influencing recurrence were analyzed.ResultsThe study included 36 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, with 12 having preoperatively suspected or proven uLMS and 24 having incidentally discovered uLMS. No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding disease‐free survival (23.7 vs. 27.3 months, log rank = 0.28), disease‐specific survival (median not reached, log rank = 0.78), or sites of relapse. Notably, among patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy (compared to open surgery), a significantly higher rate of locoregional recurrence was found (78% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.04). Nevertheless, no significant differences in survival were observed based on the surgical approach.ConclusionsPreoperative suspicion for uLMS did not seem to impact survival outcomes or the pattern of recurrence. Furthermore, although patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy showed a higher rate of locoregional relapse, this did not affect their overall survival.