Annukka Pasanen

Clinicopathologic stratification demonstrates survival differences between endometrial carcinomas with mismatch repair deficiency and no specific molecular profile: a cohort study

Endometrial carcinomas with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) and no specific molecular profile (NSMP) are considered to have intermediate prognoses. However, potential prognostic differences between these molecular subgroups remain unclear due to the lack of standardized control for clinicopathologic factors. This study aims to evaluate outcomes of MMRd and NSMP endometrial carcinomas across guideline-based clinicopathologic risk groups. This study analyzed patients treated at a single tertiary center. Immunohistochemistry and polymerase-ϵ sequencing were performed for molecular classification. MLH1-deficient tumors underwent methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Carcinomas were classified into clinicopathologic risk groups according to European guidelines. The analysis included 420 MMRd and 399 NSMP carcinomas. Among MMRd cases, 224 were subcategorized as MLH1-methylated or MLH1-non-methylated. Median follow-up was 71 months (range; 1-136). Survival differences were most notable in clinicopathologic medium-risk carcinomas, with the MMRd subgroup exhibiting poorer progression-free, disease-specific, and overall survival compared to NSMP. Adjusting for age and adjuvant therapy, MMRd still showed an association with progression-free survival. Both MLH1-methylated (n = 154) and MLH1-non-methylated tumors (n = 70) were associated with more aggressive clinicopathologic risk groups compared to NSMP, but only methylated tumors showed poorer outcomes. The distinct outcomes for MMRd and NSMP in the clinicopathologic medium-risk group suggest that uterine risk factors may worsen the prognosis for MMRd endometrial carcinomas. Advanced stage may be the primary factor contributing to poor outcomes in high-risk-advanced metastatic carcinomas. Clinicopathologic factors may particularly worsen the prognosis of MLH1-methylated carcinomas.

A Risk-scoring Model for Predicting Post-recurrence Survival in Patients With Endometrial Carcinoma

The survival time of patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma is generally short. However, considerable interindividual variation exists. We developed a risk-scoring model for predicting post-recurrence survival in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Patients with endometrial carcinoma treated at a single institution between 2007 and 2013 were identified. Pearson chi-squared analyses were used to compute odds ratios for the associations between risk factors and short survival after cancer recurrence. The results for biochemical analyses represented values at diagnosis of disease recurrence or values at initial diagnosis for those patients who had a primary refractory disease. Logistic regression models were constructed for the identification of variables that independently predict short post-recurrence survival. The models were used to assign points based on odds ratios for risk factors and risk scores were derived. In total, 236 patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma were included in the study. Based on overall survival analysis, 12 months was selected as the cut-off for short post-recurrence survival. Factors associated with short post-recurrence survival were platelet count, serum CA125 concentration and progression-free survival. A risk-scoring model with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.782 (95% confidence interval 0.713-0.851) was developed in patients without missing data (n = 182). When patients with a primary refractory disease were excluded, age and blood haemoglobin concentration were identified as additional predictors of short post-recurrence survival. For this subpopulation (n = 152), a risk-scoring model with an AUC of 0.821 (95% confidence interval 0.750-0.892) was developed. We report a risk-scoring model that shows acceptable to excellent accuracy in predicting post-recurrence survival in patients with endometrial carcinoma, with primary refractory diseases included or excluded. This model has potential applications in precision medicine in patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Differential impact of clinicopathological risk factors within the 2 largest ProMisE molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma

Objective To assess whether the prognostic impact of conventional risk factors and ancillary biomarkers differs across the 2 largest ProMisE molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma (EC). Methods Direct sequencing of POLE exonuclease domain hot spots and immunohistochemistry for MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6 and p53 were performed on 745 unselected endometrioid ECs to identify mismatch repair deficient (MMR-D, n = 264) and no specific molecular profile (NSMP, n = 206) ECs. Molecular group-specific survival analyses and interaction analyses were performed to determine the prognostic relevance of clinicopathological factors and various biomarkers (L1 cell adhesion molecule, estrogen and progesterone receptor, beta-catenin, p16, E-cadherin, KRAS) within the subgroups. Results Molecular subgroup did not have an independent effect on disease-specific survival after adjustment for conventional risk factors (P = 0.101). High grade (G3) and p16 hyperexpression remained significant predictors of survival in NSMP. Stage II-IV, ≥50% myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion and loss of E-cadherin were independent predictors in the MMR-D group. In the interaction analysis, molecular subclass significantly modified the prognostic effect of high grade and p16 hyperexpression, which showed a stronger negative effect on survival in NSMP as compared to MMR-D (P for interaction = 0.016 for grade and 0.033 for p16). Conclusions Grade of differentiation and p16 hyperexpression appear to have a stronger prognostic impact in NSMP as compared to MMR-D EC. While these results need to be confirmed in a larger study population, they indicate that differential impact of risk factors needs to be taken into account when developing new molecular class-integrated risk stratification algorithms for EC.

Clinicopathological significance of deficient DNA mismatch repair and MLH1 promoter methylation in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma

The pathogenesis of DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient endometrial carcinoma (EC) is driven by inactivating methylation or less frequently mutation of an MMR gene (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, or MSH6). This study evaluated the prognostic and clinicopathologic differences between methylation-linked and nonmethylated MMR-deficient endometrioid ECs. We performed MMR immunohistochemistry and methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and classified 682 unselected endometrioid ECs as MMR proficient (MMRp, n = 438) and MMR deficient (MMRd, n = 244), with the latter subcategorized as methylated (MMRd Met) and nonmethylated tumors. Loss of MMR protein expression was detected in 35.8% of the tumors as follows: MLH1 + PMS2 in 29.8%, PMS2 in 0.9%, MSH2 + MSH6 in 1.3%, MSH6 in 2.8%, and multiple abnormalities in 0.9%. Of the 244 MMRd cases, 76% were methylation-linked. MMR deficiency was associated with older age, high grade of differentiation (G3), advanced stage (II-IV), larger tumor size, abundant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 positivity in immune cells and combined positive score, wild-type p53, negative L1CAM, ARID1A loss, and type of adjuvant therapy. MMRd-Met phenotype correlated with older age and larger tumor size, and predicted diminished disease-specific survival in the whole cohort. In the MMRd subgroup, univariate analysis demonstrated an association between disease-specific survival and disease stage II-IV, high grade (G3), deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular invasion, ER negativity, and L1CAM positivity. In conclusion, MMR methylation profile correlates with clinicopathologic characteristics of endometrioid EC, and MMRd-Met phenotype predicts lower disease-specific survival. MMR deficiency, but not MLH1 methylation status, correlates with T-cell inflammation and PD-L1 expression.

Boosting cytotoxicity of adoptive allogeneic NK cell therapy with an oncolytic adenovirus encoding a human vIL-2 cytokine for the treatment of human ovarian cancer

AbstractDespite good results in the treatment of hematological malignancies, Natural killer (NK) cells have shown limited effectiveness in solid tumors, such as ovarian cancer (OvCa). Here, we assessed the potential of an oncolytic adenovirus expressing a variant interleukin-2 (vIL-2) cytokine, Ad5/3-E2F-d24-vIL2 (vIL-2 virus), also known as TILT-452, to enhance NK cell therapy efficacy in human OvCa ex vivo. Human OvCa surgical specimens were processed into single-cell suspensions and NK cells were expanded from healthy blood donors. OvCa sample digests were co-cultured ex vivo with NK cells and vIL-2 virus and cancer cell killing potential assessed in real time through cell impedance measurement. Proposed therapeutic combination was evaluated in vivo with an OvCa patient-derived xenograft (PDX) in mice. Addition of vIL-2 virus significantly enhanced NK cell therapy killing potential in treated OvCa co-cultures. Similarly, vIL-2 virus in combination with NK cell therapy promoted the best in vivo OvCa tumor control. Mechanistically, vIL-2 virus induced higher percentages of granzyme B in NK cells, and CD8+ T cells, while T regulatory cell proportions remained comparable to NK cell monotherapy in vivo. Ad5/3-E2F-d24-vIL2 virus treatment represents a promising strategy to boost adoptive NK cell therapeutic effect in human OvCa.