Anna Del Fabro

Role of Age, Comorbidity, and Frailty in the Prediction of Postoperative Complications After Surgery for Vulvar Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study with the Development of a Nomogram

Surgery is the cornerstone of vulvar cancer treatment, but it is associated with a significant risk of complications that may impact prognosis, particularly in older patients with multiple comorbidities. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of age, comorbidities, and frailty in predicting postoperative complications after vulvar cancer surgery and to develop a predictive nomogram. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients who underwent surgery for vulvar cancer at two Italian institutions from January 2018 to December 2023. A logistic regression model for the rate of Clavien-Dindo 2+ 30-days complications was run, considering the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (AACCI), body mass index (BMI), and frailty as exposures. Lesion characteristics and surgical procedures were considered as confounders. Among the 225 included patients, 50 (22.2%) had a grade 2+ complication. The predictive score of the nomogram ranged from 44 to 140. The AACCI (0–64 points) and BMI (0–100 points) were independently associated with a risk of complications. A nomogram including the AACCI and BMI predicts the risk of complications for patients undergoing surgery for vulvar cancer. The preoperative determination of the risk of complications enables surgical planning and allows a tailored peri- and postoperative management plan.

The future of gynecologic oncologic surgery: a narrative review of current surgical trials

Recent advances in gynecologic oncology have driven a paradigm shift toward less invasive, more personalized surgical approaches. This narrative review critically examines key ongoing international trials investigating innovative surgical strategies across vulvar, cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers, with a focus on improving oncologic outcomes while minimizing morbidity. In vulvar cancer, trials are exploring the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the replacement of inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy with chemoradiation in selected patients. For cervical cancer, large multicenter randomized trials are evaluating the oncologic safety of minimally invasive hysterectomy, surgical staging for para-aortic disease, and robotic-assisted surgery. In the contest of ovarian cancer, randomized trials are assessing the role of lymphadenectomy in early-stage disease, the optimal timing of cytoreductive surgery (primary versus interval), and the potential benefits of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, even in cases of platinum-resistant recurrence. For endometrial cancer, both observational and interventional studies are investigating sentinel lymph nodes mapping and robotic-assisted hysterectomy as alternatives to traditional staging procedures. Collectively, these trials underscore the growing importance of individualized treatment strategies guided by disease stage, histologic subtype, response to neoadjuvant therapy, and patient-specific factors. While minimally invasive techniques and surgical de-escalation appear promising for selected patient populations, critical questions remain regarding long-term oncologic safety, cost-effectiveness, and the consistency of practice across institutions. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence and outlines how the outcomes of these pivotal studies are expected to influence future guidelines in gynecologic cancer surgery.