Anna Carbó

An ambispective, real-world multi-center study of DOstarlimab in patients with Recurrent or Advanced DNA mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancer (GEICO 120-R/DORA study)

Patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who experience progression following platinum-based chemotherapy have limited treatment options. The phase I GARNET trial showed the high efficacy of dostarlimab in treating mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) endometrial cancer. DORA is a multi-center, ambispective, observational real-world study evaluating the efficacy and safety of dostarlimab. The study included patients with dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer who had experienced tumor progression on or after a platinum-based treatment and had received at least 1 cycle of dostarlimab within the Spanish Expanded Access Program. The primary endpoints were objective response rate and duration of response. A total of 129 patients from 57 of the Spanish Research Group for Gynaecological Cancer (GEICO) affiliated hospitals were enrolled, with 125 evaluable for radiological response. The median duration of dostarlimab administration was 8.8 months (interquartile range; 13.2), and 73 patients (57%) remained on therapy at the data cutoff. With a median follow-up of 11.6 months (range; 0.8-30.1), the objective response rate was 53.6% (95% CI 44.4 to 62.5). Complete response was observed in 27 patients (21.6%), and partial response in 40 (32%), with a median time to response of 2.9 months (95% CI 2.6 to 3.6). The median duration of response was not reached. The probability of maintaining the response at 12 and 24 months was 84.98% (95% CI 70.8 to 92.5) and 73.39% (95% CI 50.5 to 86.9), respectively. Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 4.7% of patients. Dostarlimab monotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer patients shows similar efficacy in real-world practice to that observed in the GARNET trial.

Prognostic Role of Neutrophil, Monocyte and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratios in Advanced Ovarian Cancer According to the Time of Debulking Surgery

Despite a multimodal radical treatment, mortality of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC) remains high. Host-related factors, such as systemic inflammatory response and its interplay with the immune system, remain underexplored. We hypothesized that the prognostic impact of this response could vary between patients undergoing primary debulking surgery (PDS) and those undergoing interval debulking surgery (IDS). Therefore, we evaluated the outcomes of two surgical groups of newly diagnosed AEOC patients according to the neutrophil, monocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratios (NLR, MLR, PLR), taking median ratio values as cutoffs. In the PDS group (n = 61), low NLR and PLR subgroups showed significantly better overall survival (not reached (NR) vs. 72.7 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.9–95.2, p = 0.019; and NR vs. 56.1 months, 95% CI: 40.9–95.2, p = 0.004, respectively) than those with high values. Similar results were observed in progression free survival. NLR and PLR-high values resulted in negative prognostic factors, adjusting for residual disease, BRCA1/2 status and stage (HR 2.48, 95% CI: 1.03–5.99, p = 0.043, and HR 2.91, 95% CI: 1.11–7.64, p = 0.03, respectively). In the IDS group (n = 85), ratios were not significant prognostic factors. We conclude that NLR and PLR may have prognostic value in the PDS setting, but none in IDS, suggesting that time of surgery can modulate the prognostic impact of baseline complete blood count (CBC).