Investigator
Alexandra Hospital
Possible Prognostic Role of BMI Before Chemotherapy in the Outcomes of Women with Ovarian Cancer
Background/Objectives: Survival rates for ovarian cancer remain distressingly low. Despite established prognostic factors, the need to identify modifiable parameters to influence survival outcomes is imperative. Overweight and obesity, both prevalent conditions, have been implicated in cancer development and potentially poor survival. However, conflicting data on the associations of body mass index (BMI) with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in ovarian cancer patients necessitate further exploration. This study aims to investigate the prognostic role of BMI before chemotherapy in women with ovarian cancer, specifically focusing on PFS and OS. Methods: A retrospective analysis encompassed 1,136 patients diagnosed with ovarian carcinomas between 1995 and 2018. Patients were categorized based on BMI at presentation, and a comprehensive examination of clinicopathological, treatment, and survival data was conducted. Results: In the patient population, normal weight patients (BMI < 25 kg/m2) demonstrated a median PFS of 12.8 months (95% CI 11.7–13.9 months), while overweight/obese patients (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) exhibited a significantly longer median PFS of 14.9 months (95% CI 13.6–16.4 months, P = 0.006). No statistically significant difference was noted in median OS between the two BMI groups. Subgroup analysis for different histological subtypes revealed a statistically significant benefit for overweight and obese patients with serous and endometrioid histology (mPFS 12.9 months, 95% CI 11.7–14.0 vs. 15.6 months, 95% CI 13.9–17.3, P = 0.012 and 14.6 months 95% CI 13.7–15.5 vs. 25.6 months, 95% CI 9.5–41.7, P = 0.031, respectively). Additionally, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 demonstrated a significant advantage in advanced-stage disease. Conclusions: The study underscores the intricate association between BMI and ovarian cancer prognosis. While a statistically significant difference in progression-free survival was noted between normal weight and overweight/obese patients, with the latter group experiencing a survival benefit, no such difference was observed in overall survival.
What Has Changed in the Management of Uterine Serous Carcinomas? Two Decades of Experience
Uterine serous carcinoma accounts for 3–10% of endometrial cancers, but it is the most lethal histopathological subtype. The molecular characterization of endometrial carcinomas has allowed novel therapeutic approaches for these patients. We undertook a retrospective analysis of patients with uterine serous carcinomas treated in our hospital within the last two decades to identify possible changes in their management. The patients and their characteristics were evenly distributed across the two decades. Treatment modalities did not change significantly throughout this period. After adjuvant treatment, patients’ median disease-free survival was 42.07 months (95% CI: 20.28–63.85), and it did not differ significantly between the two decades (p = 0.059). The median overall survival was 47.51 months (95% Cl: 32.18–62.83), and it significantly favored the first decade’s patients (p = 0.024). In patients with de novo metastatic or recurrent disease, median progression-free survival was 7.8 months (95% Cl: 5.81–9.93), whereas both the median progression-free survival and the median overall survival of these patients did not show any significant improvement during the examined time period. Overall, the results of our study explore the minor changes in respect of uterine serous carcinoma’s treatment over the last two decades, which are reflected in the survival outcomes of these patients and consequently underline the critical need for therapeutic advances in the near future.
Pembrolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide in heavily pre-treated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been widely implemented in the treatment of solid tumors. Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) compounds, and poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARP) are under evaluation in ovarian cancer. We aim to explore the efficacy of pembrolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. This was a retrospective study of all patients who received pembrolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide for recurrent platinum-resistant heavily pre-treated ovarian cancer in the Oncology Unit of Alexandra University Hospital from January 2021 to July 2022. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years (SD 9.2; range 37-72). All patients were diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Initial disease stage was International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IIIC in most cases (11/15, 73%). Patients were heavily pre-treated with a median of six (range 4-9) prior lines of systemic therapy. All patients experienced disease progression on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, and median progression-free survival on first-line treatment was 22 months (95% CI 10.6 to 33.4). Patients received a median of four cycles of pembrolizumab in combination with cyclophosphamide and bevacizumab (range 3-20). Overall response rate was 13% (2/15) and disease control rate was 33% (5/15) with two patients achieving partial response and three patients achieving stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (95% CI 1.3 to 5.7) and the 6-month progression-free survival rate was 20%. Treatment was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities. We showed that the combination of pembrolizumab with bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide is an effective alternative in heavily pre-treated patients with ovarian cancer who have otherwise limited treatment options.
BRCA1/2 Mutation Types Do Not Affect Prognosis in Ovarian Cancer Patients
Background: High grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most lethal type of epithelial ovarian cancer, with a prevalence of germline BRCA1/2 mutations as high as 20%. Our objective is to determine whether the location of mutations in the different domains of the BRCA1/2 genes affects the clinical outcome of HGSOC patients. Methods: A total of 51 women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutated ovarian cancer were identified. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: In our study cohort, 35 patients were carriers of germline mutations in BRCA1 and 16 in BRCA2. The median PFS time following completion of the primary therapy was 23.8 months (95% CI 20.1–27.5) and the median OS was 92.9 months (95% CI 69.8–116.1) in all BRCA carriers. After multivariate analysis, no significant association among the location or type of BRCA1/2 mutation with PFS or OS was identified. Notably, significant differences in PFS between carriers of identical mutations in the same BRCA gene were detected. Conclusions: Among HGSOC patients, BRCA1/2 carriers with mutations in different locations of the genes show no significant difference in survival outcomes, in terms of PFS and OS, suggesting the potential effect of other genetic abnormalities and co-contributing risk factors.
