Angeles Alvarez Secord

Molecular Profiling and Tumor Biomarker Analysis of GOG281/LOGS: A Positive Late-Phase Trial of Trametinib for Recurrent/Persistent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma

Abstract Purpose: Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a distinct form of ovarian cancer characterized by younger patient age and relative chemoresistance. The GOG281/LOGS trial (NCT02101788) investigated the efficacy of the MEK inhibitor trametinib compared with physician’s choice standard-of-care (SOC) in patients with LGSOC with persistent/recurrent disease. The study demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in the trametinib-treated arm. Experimental Design: Two hundred and sixty patients with recurrent/persistent LGSOC were enrolled and randomly assigned in GOG281. We performed molecular analysis of 170 patients with available tumor specimens, comprising whole-exome sequencing and phospho-ERK (pERK) IHC, to identify biomarkers of clinical benefit from trametinib. The demographics of the translational cohort (n = 170) were comparable with those of the total trial cohort. Results: High tumor pERK expression (greater than the median histoscore of 140) was associated with significantly prolonged PFS with trametinib treatment versus SOC (median 20.1 vs. 5.6 months, log-rank P < 0.0001; test for interaction P = 0.023). Tumors harboring canonical RAS–RAF–MAPK mutations (KRAS/BRAF/NRAS: 44/134, 32.8% of cases) had a higher response rate to trametinib (50.0% vs. 8.3%; Barnard’s P = 0.0004; test for interaction P = 0.054), but KRAS/BRAF/NRAS status was not predictive of prolonged PFS (test for interaction P = 0.719). KRAS amplification (n = 5 without KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation) and mutation of MAPK-associated genes (n = 25 without KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation or KRAS copy number gain) expanded the number of cases with identifiable MAPK defects to 55.2%, but consideration of these events did not improve the discrimination of trametinib responders. Chr1p loss (49% of cases) was associated with lower pERK expression (P = 0.021). Conclusions: This exploratory analysis suggests that pERK expression and mutation of KRAS/BRAF/NRAS are candidate biomarkers of improved PFS and response to trametinib, respectively.

Suppression of Paclitaxel‐Induced Neuropathy and Ovarian Tumor Growth by Mn Porphyrin, MnTnBuOE‐2‐PyP 5+ (BMX‐001)

Numerous cellular and animal studies demonstrated the ability of redox‐active Mn(III) N ‐alkyl‐ and N ‐alkoxyalkylpyridyporphyrins (MnPs) to protect normal tissue while suppressing tumor growth. The mechanism primarily involves the modulation of NF‐кB and Nrf2 signaling pathways via catalysis of MnP/H 2 O 2 ‐driven protein thiol oxidation. Such differential protection/suppression effects have paved the way of Mn porphyrins (commonly known as mimics of superoxide dismutase) into clinical trials, therefore introducing new line of therapeutics that are affecting cellular redox status/oxidative stress, rather than specific proteins. The most clinically advanced Mn porphyrin, Mn(III) meso ‐tetrakis( N ‐n‐butoxyethyl‐2‐pyridyl) porphyrin (MnTnBuOE‐2‐PyP 5+ , BMX‐001) has progressed into five Phase II clinical trials, two of those related to the injuries of central nervous system. Currently, no efficient treatment for chemotherapy‐induced neuropathy is available in clinics. We therefore employed BMX‐001 to assess its effect on paclitaxel (PTX)‐induced neuropathy. Mechanical (Von‐Frey filaments) and thermal (hot plate) stimulation, toxicity (body weight), muscular coordination and general physical condition (rotarod) of female CD‐1 mice were evaluated over 3 weeks with 2 mg/kg daily dosing and also at clinically relevant dosing of 0.8 mg/kg given subcutaneously (SC) twice weekly after 1.6 mg/kg loading dose. Data revealed a significant ability of BMX‐001 to suppress peripheral neuropathy and neuroinflammation. Importantly, while protecting peripheral tissue, BMX‐001 suppressed the tumor growth of CAOV2 high‐grade serous ovarian cancer in a mouse subcutaneous xenograft model. Previously, the strong anticancer effect was only seen when Mn porphyrins were combined with radiation, chemotherapy, and ascorbate (Asc). Our data further demonstrate that high‐grade serous ovarian cancer is the first in vivo cancer thus far studied where redox‐active Mn porphyrin, as a single agent, exhibits strong anticancer effect, comparable to that of PTX. The effect is presumably due to high tumor levels of BMX‐001 and high oxidative stress specific to the aggressive chemoresistant CAOV2 cell line. Such a strong anticancer effect of BMX‐001 would allow for lowering the dosing of PTX and reducing the neuropathy. The combined neuropathy protection and anticancer efficacy demonstrate, therefore, strong therapeutic potential of BMX‐001 for gynecological cancers. Moreover, the ability of BMX‐001 to suppress neuropathy may be relevant for all types of cancer where chemotherapeutics that induce neuropathy are used as a standard‐of‐care.

Genomic alterations, molecularly targeted therapy, and survival: a real-world Endometrial Cancer Molecularly Targeted Therapy Consortium cohort study

Next-generation sequencing and tumor testing to direct therapy in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer are frequently used, but the impact of this approach is unclear. We sought to confirm the proportion of patients with at least 1 actionable alteration and whether the use of molecularly targeted therapy was associated with improved survival in metastatic endometrial cancer. A multidisciplinary consortium was formed to study tumor testing and treatment with targeted therapies in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer. Tumor testing and therapeutic decisions were physician's recommendations. The abstracted data included age, stage, grade, histology, race, ethnicity, treatment, genomic alterations, protein expression for Her2, p53, mismatch repair, estrogen and progesterone receptors, and survival. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS v9.4. A total of 967 patients from 12 centers were included. The median age was 64 years (range; 22-93 years). Of the participants, 68.5% were White, 24.0% were Black, 2.0% were Asian, and 92.7% were non-Hispanic. A total of 656 (67.8%) patients had recurrent/persistent disease and received a median of two (range; 0-9) therapies. 902 (93.3%) underwent tumor testing. Overall, 576 (94.0%) patients with next-generation sequencing testing had at least 1 genomic alteration in 11 pre-specified genes. The most frequent alterations were PI3K (35.8%), TP53 (34.7%), and PTEN (26.5%) mutations, respectively. A subset of 233 patients received 292 matched biologic therapies, and the median follow-up was 29.7 months, while the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.9 and 20.5 months, respectively. The consortium facilitated the development of real-world data on the patterns of genomic testing and molecularly targeted therapy used in a racially and geographically diverse patient cohort with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer. Survival improved for those receiving matched biologic therapies compared to chemotherapy.

TP53 Sequencing and p53 Immunohistochemistry Predict Outcomes When Bevacizumab Is Added to Frontline Chemotherapy in Endometrial Cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE The status of p53 in a tumor can be inferred by next-generation sequencing (NGS) or by immunohistochemistry (IHC). We examined the association between p53 IHC and sequence and whether p53 IHC alone, or integrated with TP53 NGS, predicts the outcome. METHODS From GOG-86P, a randomized phase II study of chemotherapy combined with either bevacizumab or temsirolimus in advanced endometrial cancer, 213 cases had p53 protein expression data measured by IHC and TP53 NGS data. An analysis was designed to integrate p53 expression by IHC with the presence or absence of a TP53 mutation. These variables were further correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab arms versus the chemotherapy plus temsirolimus arm. RESULTS In the analysis of p53 IHC, the most striking treatment effect favoring bevacizumab was in cases where p53 was overexpressed (PFS hazard ratio [HR]: 0.46, 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.88; OS HR: 0.31, 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.62). On integrated analysis, patients with TP53 missense mutations and p53 protein overexpression had a similar treatment effect on PFS (HR: 0.41, 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.83) and OS (HR: 0.28, 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.59) favoring bevacizumab plus chemotherapy relative to temsirolimus plus chemotherapy. Concordance between TP53 NGS and p53 IHC was 88%. Concordance was 92% when cases with TP53 mutations and POLE mutations or mismatch repair deficiency were removed. CONCLUSION IHC for p53 alone or when integrated with sequencing for TP53 identifies a specific, high-risk tumor genotype/phenotype for which bevacizumab is particularly beneficial in improving outcomes when combined with chemotherapy.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel and Ifosfamide in Patients With Carcinosarcoma of the Uterus or Ovary: An NRG Oncology Trial

PURPOSE This phase III randomized trial ( NCT00954174 ) tested the null hypothesis that paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) is inferior to paclitaxel and ifosfamide (PI) for treating uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults with chemotherapy-naïve UCS or ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) were randomly assigned to PC or PI with 3-week cycles for 6-10 cycles. With 264 events in patients with UCS, the power for an overall survival (OS) hybrid noninferiority design was 80% for a null hazard ratio (HR) of 1.2 against a 13% greater death rate on PI with a type I error of 5% for a one-tailed test. RESULTS The study enrolled 536 patients with UCS and 101 patients with OCS, with 449 and 90 eligible, respectively. Primary analysis was on patients with UCS, distributed as follows: 40% stage I, 6% stage II, 31% stage III, 15% stage IV, and 8% recurrent. Among eligible patients with UCS, PC was assigned to 228 and PI to 221. PC was not inferior to PI. The median OS was 37 versus 29 months (HR = 0.87; 90% CI, 0.70 to 1.075; P < .01 for noninferiority, P > .1 for superiority). The median progression-free survival was 16 versus 12 months (HR = 0.73; P = < 0.01 for noninferiority, P < .01 for superiority). Toxicities were similar, except that more patients in the PC arm had hematologic toxicity and more patients in the PI arm had confusion and genitourinary hemorrhage. Among 90 eligible patients with OCS, those in the PC arm had longer OS (30 v 25 months) and progression-free survival (15 v 10 months) than those in the PI arm, but with limited precision, these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION PC was not inferior to the active regimen PI and should be standard treatment for UCS.

Cediranib and Olaparib Combination Compared With Cediranib or Olaparib Alone, or Chemotherapy in Platinum-Resistant or Primary Platinum-Refractory Ovarian Cancer: NRG-GY005

PURPOSE We assessed the efficacy of cediranib, olaparib, and cediranib/olaparib compared with standard-of-care chemotherapy (SOC) in platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (PROC). PATIENTS AND METHODS NRG-GY005 is an open-label, four-arm, phase II/III superiority trial enrolling patients with high-grade serous/endometrioid PROC and one to three previous therapies. Key exclusion criteria included previous receipt of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor or receipt of antiangiogenic therapy in the recurrent setting. Treatment arms (SOC [once weekly paclitaxel, topotecan, or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin], cediranib, olaparib, or cediranib/olaparib) were equally randomized. A preplanned interim futility analysis on the basis of progression-free survival (PFS) selected treatment arms to advance to phase III. PFS and overall survival (OS) were phase III coprimary end points, with hierarchical testing of PFS followed by OS to preserve type 1 error control, designed to have 90% power for a 0.625 PFS hazard ratio (HR). OS was tested after PFS in the multiple hierarchical testing procedure. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS Five hundred sixty-two eligible patients were enrolled for phase II/III. Three arms met PFS criteria to carry forward to phase III (SOC, cediranib/olaparib, and cediranib). Median PFS was 3.4, 5.2, and 4 months with SOC, cediranib/olaparib, and cediranib, respectively, with a median follow-up duration of 42.2 months. PFS HR estimates for cediranib/olaparib and cediranib ( v SOC) were 0.796 (98.3% CI, 0.597 to 1.060) and 0.972 (98.3% CI, 0.726 to 1.300), respectively. Median OS was 13.6, 12.8, and 10.5 months, and of 443 patients with measurable disease, ORR was 8.6%, 24.7%, and 13.1% for SOC, cediranib/olaparib, and cediranib, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. In patients receiving cediranib/olaparib, no statistically significant difference was observed on the NFOSI-DRS-P subscale compared with SOC (98.3% CI, –1.3 to 1.5, P = .8725). CONCLUSION The cediranib-containing arms demonstrated clinical activity on the basis of PFS but were not superior compared with SOC.

Ofranergene Obadenovec (Ofra-Vec, VB-111) With Weekly Paclitaxel for Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial (OVAL Study/GOG 3018)

PURPOSE To evaluate the addition of ofranergene obadenovec (ofra-vec, VB-111), a novel gene-based anticancer targeted therapy, to once a week paclitaxel in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). METHODS This placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03398655 ) randomly assigned patients with PROC 1:1 to receive intravenous ofra-vec every 8 weeks with once a week IV paclitaxel or placebo with paclitaxel until disease progression. The dual primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review. RESULTS Between December 2017 and March 2022, 409 patients were randomly assigned. The median PFS was 5.29 months in the ofra-vec arm and 5.36 months in the control arm, hazard ratio (HR) 1.03 (CI, 0.83 to 1.29; P = .7823). The median OS with ofra-vec was 13.37 months versus 13.14 months, HR 0.97 (CI, 0.75 to 1.27; P = .8440). Objective response rates (ORRs) per RECIST 1.1 were similar in both arms: 28.9% with ofra-vec versus 29.6% with control. In both treatment arms, response to CA-125 was a substantial prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. In the ofra-vec arm, the HR in CA-125 responders compared with that in nonresponders for PFS was 0.2428 (CI, 0.1642 to 0.3588), and for OS, the HR was 0.3343 (CI, 0.2134 to 0.5238). Safety profile was characterized by common transient flu–like symptoms such as fever and chills. CONCLUSION The addition of ofra-vec to paclitaxel did not improve PFS or OS. The PFS and ORR in the control arm exceeded the results that were anticipated on the basis of the AURELIA chemotherapy control arm. CA-125 response was a substantial prognostic biomarker for PFS and OS in patients with PROC treated with paclitaxel.

Testing the Combination of Cediranib and Olaparib in Comparison to Each Drug Alone or Other Chemotherapy in Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

This randomized phase II/III trial studies how well cediranib maleate and olaparib work when given together or separately, and compares them to standard chemotherapy in treating patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer that has returned (recurrent) after receiving chemotherapy with drugs that contain platinum (platinum-resistant) or continued to grow while being treated with platinum-based chemotherapy drugs (platinum-refractory). Cediranib maleate and olaparib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking enzymes needed for cell growth. Chemotherapy drugs work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether giving cediranib maleate and olaparib together may cause more damage to cancer cells when compared to either drug alone or standard chemotherapy.

Paclitaxel and Carboplatin or Ifosfamide in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed, Persistent or Recurrent Uterine, Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cavity Cancer

This randomized phase III trial studies paclitaxel and carboplatin see how well they work compared with paclitaxel and ifosfamide in treating patients with fallopian tube, or peritoneal cavity cancer that is newly diagnosed, persistent, or has come back (recurrent). Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel, carboplatin, and ifosfamide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether paclitaxel is more effective when given with carboplatin or ifosfamide in treating patients with uterine, ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cavity cancer.