Andrew Durden

Venous thromboembolism during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

To determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in UK gynecological cancer centers. Secondary outcomes included incidence and timing of venous thromboembolism since cancer presentation, impact on cancer treatment, and mortality. All UK gynecological cancer centers were invited to participate in this multi-center retrospective audit through the British Gynecological Cancer Society. Data were captured on all patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer within a 12-month period during 2021-2022. Patients on anticoagulation prior to cancer presentation were excluded. Patients who were diagnosed with venous thromboembolism between cancer presentation and commencing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were also excluded from our analysis of venous thromboembolism rates from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fourteen UK gynecological cancer centers returned data on 660 eligible patients. The median age was 67 years (range 34-96). In total, 131/660 (19.8%) patients were diagnosed with venous thromboembolism from cancer presentation until discharge following cytoreductive surgery. Between commencing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and post-operative discharge, 65/594 (10.9%) patients developed venous thromboembolism (median 11.3%, IQR 5.9-11.3); 55/594 (9.3%) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 10/594 (1.7%) during post-operative admission. There was no significant difference across centers (p=0.47). Of these 65 patients, 44 (68%) were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism and 30 (46%) with deep-vein thrombosis (nine had both), including in major abdominal/pelvic vessels, with 36 (55%) presenting symptomatically and 29 (45%) diagnosed incidentally on imaging. Venous thromboembolism resulted in mortality (n=3/65, 5%), and delays/changes/cancelation of treatment (n=18/65, 28%). Across a large, representative sample of UK gynecological cancer centers, one in five patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were diagnosed with a potentially preventable venous thromboembolism, including one in nine diagnosed after commencing chemotherapy. This led to adverse clinical consequences for one third, including delay to oncological treatment and mortality. This high venous thromboembolism rate justifies the consideration of thromboprophylaxis in this patient group.

Sertoli–Leydig tumor and DICER1 gene mutation: A case series and literature review

Abstract Objective Sertoli–Leydig cell tumors (SLCTs) are rare neoplasms occurring in young women with 60% associated with DICER1 mutations. This is only the second published case series of patients with SLCTs with associated DICER1 gene alterations. DICER1 syndrome is a rare inherited tumor‐susceptibility syndrome affecting organs such as the ovaries. We use this case series to inform readers on this increasingly important condition in gynecology. Methods and Results We present three young females presenting with secondary amenorrhoea, hirsutism, acne and in one case tonic–clonic seizures. All cases had high testosterone levels and an adnexal mass on ultrasound. Following surgical removal, pathology confirmed SLCTs and genetic testing followed. All three patients had DICER1 syndrome with two patients subsequently found to be related. Discussion The prevalence of DICER1 syndrome in the population is estimated to be 1 in 10 000 with a spectrum of sex cord stromal tumors affecting young women. The associated pathological classifications and management. This paper describes the DICER1 gene and the associated tumor predisposition syndrome alongside a surveillance protocol for use in clinical practice. It promotes discussion over the importance of early clinical genetics involvement in sex‐cord stromal tumors and the associated difficulties in counseling in a young patient population. Genetic testing and early detection are imperative for targeted surveillance of at‐risk organs to be performed but despite this there is no international guidance. The cases highlight the psychological impact of tumors in young patients and provokes an ethical discussion over DICER1 gene's inclusion in preimplantation genetics. Conclusions DICER1 syndrome is a rare but increasingly important condition in pediatric and adolescent gynecology with a paucity of published data and case reports. This makes international consensus on management and surveillance difficult.