AWAndreas Wienke
Papers(2)
Reasons for Not Atten…Cervical Cancer in Su…
Collaborators(10)
Anne KorirChristoph ThomssenDawit WorkuEva Johanna Kantelhar…Jana FeuchtnerMirko GrieselMuluken GizawWalburga Yvonne Joko‐…Ahmedin JemalAndreas M. Kaufmann
Institutions(6)
Martin Luther Univers…Kenya Medical Researc…Addis Ababa UniversityUniversity of Cambrid…American Cancer Socie…Charit Universittsmed…

Papers

Reasons for Not Attending Cervical Cancer Screening and Associated Factors in Rural Ethiopia

Abstract Social, economic, and cultural factors have been associated with the level of participation in cervical cancer screening programs. This study identified factors associated with nonparticipation in cervical cancer screening, as well as reasons for not attending, in the context of a population-based, cluster-randomized trial in Ethiopia. A total of 2,356 women aged 30 to 49 years in 22 clusters were invited to receive one of two screening approaches, namely human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling or visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). Participants and nonparticipants were analyzed according to their sociodemographic and economic characteristics. Reasons were determined for the refusal of women to participate in either screening method. More women in the VIA arm compared to the HPV arm declined participation in the screening [adjusted OR (AOR) 3.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.6–4.8]. Women who declined attending screening were more often living in rural areas (AOR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1–3.5) and were engaged in informal occupations (AOR = 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1–2.4). The majority of nonattendants perceived themselves to be at no risk of cervical cancer (83.1%). The main reasons given for not attending screening for both screening approaches were lack of time to attend screening, self-assertion of being healthy, and fear of screening. We found that perceived time constraints and the perception of being at no risk of getting the disease were the most important barriers to screening. Living in rural settings and informal occupation were also associated with lower participation. Offering a swift and convenient screening service could increase the participation of women in cervical cancer screening at the community level.

Cervical Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multinational Population-Based Cohort Study of Care and Guideline Adherence

Abstract Background Cervical cancer (CC) is the most common female cancer in many countries of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We assessed treatment guideline adherence and its association with overall survival (OS). Methods Our observational study covered nine population-based cancer registries in eight countries: Benin, Ethiopia, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Mali, Mozambique, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Random samples of 44–125 patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2016 were selected in each. Cancer-directed therapy (CDT) was evaluated for degree of adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (U.S.) Guidelines. Results Of 632 patients, 15.8% received CDT with curative potential: 5.2% guideline-adherent, 2.4% with minor deviations, and 8.2% with major deviations. CDT was not documented or was without curative potential in 22%; 15.7% were diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV disease. Adherence was not assessed in 46.9% (no stage or follow-up documented, 11.9%, or records not traced, 35.1%). The largest share of guideline-adherent CDT was observed in Nairobi (49%) and the smallest in Maputo (4%). In patients with FIGO stage I–III disease (n = 190), minor and major guideline deviations were associated with impaired OS (hazard rate ratio [HRR], 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36–8.37; HRR, 1.97; CI, 0.59–6.56, respectively). CDT without curative potential (HRR, 3.88; CI, 1.19–12.71) and no CDT (HRR, 9.43; CI, 3.03–29.33) showed substantially worse survival. Conclusion We found that only one in six patients with cervical cancer in SSA received CDT with curative potential. At least one-fifth and possibly up to two-thirds of women never accessed CDT, despite curable disease, resulting in impaired OS. Investments into more radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgical training could change the fatal outcomes of many patients. Implications for Practice Despite evidence-based interventions including guideline-adherent treatment for cervical cancer (CC), there is huge disparity in survival across the globe. This comprehensive multinational population-based registry study aimed to assess the status quo of presentation, treatment guideline adherence, and survival in eight countries. Patients across sub-Saharan Africa present in late stages, and treatment guideline adherence is remarkably low. Both factors were associated with unfavorable survival. This report warns about the inability of most women with cervical cancer in sub-Saharan Africa to access timely and high-quality diagnostic and treatment services, serving as guidance to institutions and policy makers. With regard to clinical practice, there might be cancer-directed treatment options that, although not fully guideline adherent, have relevant survival benefit. Others should perhaps not be chosen even under resource-constrained circumstances.

46Works
2Papers
10Collaborators
Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsNeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsBacterial InfectionsLiver CirrhosisPrognosis