Investigator

Andreas Brandl

Attending Surgical Oncologist · Universität Heidelberg Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg, General, Visceral, Transplantation Surgery

ABAndreas Brandl
Papers(1)
Multisocietal Consens…
Collaborators(4)
Guaglio MarcelloMichela CinquiniShigeki KusamuraAditi Bhatt
Institutions(4)
University Hospital H…Fondazione IRCCS Isti…Mario Negri Institute…National Institute Of…

Papers

Multisocietal Consensus on the Use of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for the Treatment of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A GRADE Approach for Evidence Evaluation and Recommendation

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe locoregional treatment of high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) comprises of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Recent evidence form randomized trials, has led to controversy related to the use of HIPEC in addition to interval CRS (iCRS) and the role of secondary CRS (sCRS) in patients with the first platinum‐sensitive recurrence from high‐grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). This multi‐society consensus, coordinated by the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) with inputs from ISSPP, SSO, ESSO, and IGCS, evaluated the role of these interventions using the GRADE ADOLOPMENT methodology.Patients and MethodsAn international expert panel reviewed evidence for the use of HIPEC in addition to iCRS in stage 3 high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and the role of sCRS for patients with platinum‐sensitive recurrent HGSOC. A systematic review assessed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for recurrence‐free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life (QoL). Recommendations were formulated using the GRADE Evidence‐to‐Decision framework.ResultsHIPEC in addition to iCRS was strongly recommended based on the results of the OVHIPEC‐1 trial, which showed significant benefit in RFS (3.5 months) and OS (12 months) without increasing the grade 3–4 morbidity. For the first platinum‐sensitive recurrence, a conditional recommendation was made either for sCRS with systemic therapy or systemic therapy alone, reflecting variability in trial outcomes due to heterogeneity in the patient population in the trials and lack of surgical standardization.ConclusionThis consensus highlights the benefits of HIPEC in addition of iCRS and key factors that limit its wide‐spread use. It underlines the need for individualized decision‐making while selecting patients for sCRS. Future research integrating advanced systemic therapies is essential to refine these recommendations and provide equitable access to these complex locoregional treatments.

68Works
1Papers
4Collaborators
Peritoneal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialLung NeoplasmsNeoplasmsRectal Neoplasms

Positions

2023–

Attending Surgical Oncologist

Universität Heidelberg Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg · General, Visceral, Transplantation Surgery

2022–

Attending Surgical Oncologist

Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin · Department of Surgery

2019–

Consultant surgeon

Champalimaud Foundation · Digestive Unit

Links & IDs
0000-0003-1990-2584

Scopus: 56789735400