Investigator
Principal Research Scientist · Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Environmental Health
Multiple types of distress are prospectively associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer
AbstractBackgroundFew modifiable risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer have been identified. We and other investigators have found that individual psychosocial factors related to distress are associated with higher risk of ovarian cancer. The present study examined whether co‐occurring distress‐related factors are associated with ovarian cancer risk.MethodsFive distress‐related factors were measured repeatedly over 21 years of follow‐up: depression, anxiety, social isolation, widowhood, and, in a subset or women, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cox proportional hazards models estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of ovarian cancer for a time‐updated count of distress‐related factors, in age‐adjusted models, then further adjusted for ovarian cancer risk factors and behavior‐related health risk factors.ResultsAcross 1,193,927 person‐years of follow‐up, 526 incident ovarian cancers occurred. Women with ≥3 versus no distress‐related psychosocial factors demonstrated increased ovarian cancer risk (HRage‐adjusted = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.16, 2.52). No significant difference in ovarian cancer risk was observed in women with one or two versus no distress‐related psychosocial factors. In the subsample with PTSD assessed, ≥3 versus no distress‐related psychosocial factors was associated with twofold greater ovarian cancer risk (HRage‐adjusted = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.01, 4.29). Further analysis suggested that women at highest ovarian cancer risk had PTSD co‐occurring with any other distress‐related factor (HR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.20, 4.01). Adjusting for cancer risk factors and health behaviors minimally impacted risk estimates.ConclusionsPresence of multiple indicators of distress was associated with risk of ovarian cancer. When including PTSD as an indicator of distress, the association was strengthened.
Timing of depression in relation to risk of ovarian cancer
Abstract Background Several studies have suggested that depression may be associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer. Less is known about whether timing matters regarding when depression occurs. To provide evidence for an etiologically relevant exposure period, we examined depression occurring during the time in which precursor lesions develop and progress to invasive carcinoma with the risk of developing ovarian cancer. Methods Using data from 2 prospective cohorts (1992-2015), we divided follow-up into consecutive 2-year periods for analytic purposes, referred to as “cancer ascertainment periods.” We estimated associations of depression in the 10 years before each cancer ascertainment period with incident cancer, using Cox proportional hazards models. Next, we estimated associations of depression occurring up to 18 years before each ascertainment period, in 2-year increments, with incident cancer. We adjusted for demographic, health, and behavioral factors. All tests of statistical significance were two-sided, with a P-value threshold of less than .05. Results Depression occurring in the 10 prior years was associated with 30% greater risk of cancer (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.30, 95% confidence interval = 1.15 to 1.46). Associations were similar in fully adjusted models (HR = 1.27). Depression occurring in the 14 years before ascertainment was associated with elevated risk, although only estimates for depression 0-2, 6-8, and 8-10 years before ascertainment reached statistical significance (HR range = 1.20-1.36). Conclusion Depression occurring up to 14 years before cancer ascertainment was associated with greater cancer risk. This is the time of precursor progression to invasive ovarian carcinoma, suggesting depression may be an ovarian cancer-promoting agent.
Principal Research Scientist
Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health · Environmental Health