Andrea Etrusco

The Role of Tumor Biomarkers in Tailoring the Approach to Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Growing evidence has demonstrated the role of mutations of tumor biomarkers in diagnosing and treating epithelial ovarian cancer. This review aims to analyze recent literature on the correlation between tumor biomarkers and chemotherapy in nonmucinous ovarian cancer, providing suggestions for personalized treatment approaches. An extensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies and trials. BRCA1/2 mutations are central in homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) in ovarian cancer, but several other genetic mutations also contribute to varying cancer risks. While the role of MMR testing in ovarian cancer is debated, it is more commonly linked to non-serous ovarian cancer, often associated with Lynch syndrome. A significant proportion of ovarian cancer patients have HRD, affecting treatment decisions in both first-line (especially in advanced stages) and second-line therapy due to HRD’s connection with platinum-based therapy and PARP inhibitors’ response. However, validated genetic tests to identify HRD have not yet been universally implemented. There is no definitive therapeutic algorithm for advanced ovarian cancer, despite ongoing efforts and multiple proposed tools. Future research should focus on expanding the utility of biomarkers, reducing resistance, and increasing the actionable biomarker pool.

Chemoembolization, Radioembolization, and Percutaneous Ablation: New Opportunities for Treating Ovarian Cancer Liver Metastasis

Parenchymal liver metastases from ovarian cancer, occurring in 2-12.5% of cases, significantly worsen prognosis. While surgery and systemic treatments remain primary options, unresectable or chemotherapy-resistant multiple liver metastases pose a significant challenge. Recent advances in liver-directed therapies, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and radioembolization, offer potential treatment alternatives. However, the efficacy of these techniques is limited by factors such as tumor size, number, and location. The ideal candidate for tumor ablation is a patient with paucifocal disease, a single tumor up to 5 cm or up to 3 tumors smaller than 3 cm and tumors 1 cm away from major bile ducts and high-flow vessels. Transarterial chemoembolization could be performed in patients with less than 70% tumor load. Differently, radioembolization is available with less limitation on the sites or number of liver cancers. Radioembolization techniques are also able to downsize liver metastases. However, there are limited data regarding the outcomes of loco-regional therapy in patients with hepatic metastases from ovarian cancer. Advancing liver-directed therapies through interventional oncology, combined with robust data on the oncological efficacy of these local treatments, will validate their potential as effective locoregional therapies for liver metastases. This could offer a promising treatment option for patients with ovarian cancer and unresectable hepatic metastases.

Reproductive and Oncologic Outcomes in Young Women with Stage IA and Grade 2 Endometrial Carcinoma Undergoing Fertility-Sparing Treatment: A Systematic Review

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in both Europe and the USA. Approximately 3–5% of cases occur in women of reproductive age. Fertility-sparing treatment (FST) options are available, but very limited evidence regarding grade 2 (G2) ECs exists in the current literature. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively evaluate reproductive and oncologic outcomes among young women diagnosed with stage IA or G2EC disease who underwent FST. Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was carried out on the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Methodology Register), the Health Technology Assessment Database, and Web of Science. Only original studies that reported the oncologic and reproductive outcomes of patients with stage IA and G2EC tumors who underwent FST were considered eligible for inclusion in this systematic review (CRD42023484892). Studies describing only the FST for endometrial hyperplasia or G1 EC were excluded. Results: Twenty-two papers that met the abovementioned inclusion criteria were included in the present systematic review. Preliminary analysis suggested encouraging oncologic and reproductive outcomes after FST. Conclusions: The FST approach may represent a feasible and safe option for women of childbearing age diagnosed with G2EC. Despite these promising findings, cautious interpretation is warranted due to inherent limitations, including heterogeneity in study designs and potential biases. Further research with standardized methodologies and larger sample sizes is imperative for obtaining more robust conclusions.

Reproductive Outcomes in Young Women with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Greater than 2 cm Undergoing Fertility-Sparing Treatment: A Systematic Review

Background and Objectives: Despite advancements in detection and treatment, cervical cancer remains a significant health concern, particularly among young women of reproductive age. Limited data exists in the literature regarding fertility-sparing treatment (FST) of cervical cancers with tumor sizes greater than 2 cm. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the reproductive outcomes of women diagnosed with cervical cancer greater than 2 cm who underwent FST. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was carried out on the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Methodology Register), the Health Technology Assessment Database, and Web of Science. Only original studies (retrospective or prospective) that reported reproductive outcomes of patients with cervical cancer >2 cm were considered eligible for inclusion in this systematic review (CRD42024521964). Studies describing only the oncologic outcomes, involving FST for cervical cancers less than 2 cm in size, and case reports were excluded. Results: Seventeen papers that met the abovementioned inclusion criteria were included in the present systematic review. In total, 443 patients with a cervical cancer larger than 2 cm were included in this systematic review. Eighty pregnancies occurred, with 24 miscarriages and 54 live births. Conclusions: FST appears to be a viable option for women of childbearing age diagnosed with cervical cancer larger than 2 cm. However, careful consideration is advised in interpreting these encouraging results, as they are subject to limitations, such as variability in study designs and potential biases. In addition, reproductive outcomes should be further cross-referenced with oncologic outcomes to clarify the potential risk–benefit ratio. It is critical to conduct further research using standardized approaches and larger participant groups to strengthen the validity of the conclusions drawn.