Amandeep Taggar

Salvage interstitial brachytherapy for treatment of recurrent endometrial cancers in the vagina: Seven-year single institution experience and review of second recurrence patterns

Interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) is a known treatment for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer. This study reviews a large tertiary institution's ISBT experience and outcomes for vaginal recurrences. Patients who underwent salvage ISBT for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer from January 1, 2014 to August 31, 2021, were identified. Initial and salvage disease factors and treatments were recorded. Outcomes were calculated including overall survival, local, and distant failure. Thirty-nine patients were included; thirty received external beam radiotherapy and interstitial brachytherapy (EBRT + ISBT) while 9 received ISBT alone. At initial diagnosis, the ISBT alone group had an older median age, with stage IA-IV disease, frequently receiving adjuvant treatment, compared to the EBRT with ISBT group with mainly stage IA disease who did not. Median follow up was 22 months and median time to recurrence 14 months (16.5 months in EBRT + ISBT group and 14 in the ISBT alone group). Two-year overall survival was 85% for all patients, 85.6% and 83.3%in the EBRT + ISBT and ISBT alone groups, respectively. Local failure was 22.7% for all patients, 16.7% in the EBRT + ISBT group and 11.1% in the ISBT alone group. Median HRCTV D90 (EQD2) was 76.8 Gy in the EBRT + ISBT group, and 57.9 Gy in the ISBT alone group. Late grade 3 or higher toxicity occurred in only 3 patients. EBRT + ISBT is an effective treatment for endometrial cancer vaginal recurrence, with acceptable toxicity. ISBT alone is an option for patients with contraindications to or with previous treatment of pelvic radiation.

Pan-Canadian Analysis of Practice Patterns in Small Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: Insights from a Multidisciplinary Survey

Small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (SCNECC) is a rare cancer with poor prognosis, with limited data to guide its treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate practice patterns in the management of SCNECC. A 23-question online survey on management of SCNECC was disseminated to Canadian gynecologic oncologists (GO), radiation oncologists (RO) and medical oncologists (MO). In total, 34 practitioners from eight provinces responded, including 17 GO, 13 RO and four MO. During staging and diagnosis, 74% of respondents used a trimodality imaging approach, and 85% tested for neuroendocrine markers. In early-stage (1A1-1B2) SCNECC, 87% of practitioners used a surgical-based approach with various adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments. In locally advanced (1B3-IVA) SCNECC, 53% favored primary chemoradiation, with cisplatin and etoposide, with the remainder using surgical or radiation-based approaches. In metastatic and recurrent SCNECC, the most common first-line regimen was etoposide and platinum, and 63% of practitioners considered clinical trials in the first line setting or beyond. This survey highlights diverse practice patterns in the treatment of SCNECC. Interdisciplinary input is crucial to individualizing multimodality treatment, and there is a need for prospective trials and intergroup collaboration to define the optimal approach towards managing this rare cancer type.

Changing Landscape of Radiation Therapy for Advanced Cervical Cancer With a Focus on Interstitial Brachytherapy: A Canadian Practice Patterns Survey

To document the evolution of radical radiation therapy and interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) utilization practice patterns across Canada, including use of imaging, technical details, and usage of anesthesia/analgesia, and to compare advanced (AC) versus nonadvanced (nAC) brachytherapy (BT) center practices. All Canadian centers with BT services were identified. One gynecology radiation oncologist per center was sent a 64-item questionnaire regarding the center's practice for patients with cervical cancer. Centers were categorized based on availability of advanced BT expertise (AC) versus those referring patients to other centers for advanced BT techniques (nAC). Aggregate responses are reported and compared with practice patterns identified in our previous survey. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data, and the Fisher exact test, Fisher-Freeman-Halton, or Mann-Whitney-Wilcox test was used for comparisons. Thirty-seven of 38 respondents completed the survey (response rate: 97.4%). Compared with 2015, there has been an increase in utilization of magnetic resonance imaging as the sole imaging modality for BT planning: 3 of 26 (11%) versus 12 of 37 (32%; P = .03). The number of centers with the ability to perform ISBT increased in 2020 compared with 2015 (26/37 [70%] vs 13/26 [50%], P = .710); this trend is likely due to an increase in use of hybrid (Vienna, Utrecht, Venezia) applicators (36% [2015] vs 84% [2020]; P = .175). Fifteen (40%) centers had the ability to perform perineal-ISBT (P-ISBT). Sixteen and 21 centers were identified as AC and nAC, respectively. All 16 AC centers had the ability to perform ISBT, compared with only 10 nAC centers (P < .001). A higher proportion of AC centers had fellowship-trained radiation oncologists performing brachytherapy, compared with nAC centers (94% vs 14%, P < .001). In terms of anesthesia, conscious sedation was the only available choice at low-patient-volume centers (8/37, 21%) performing intracavitary BT only. Those performing ISBT had choice of general, spinal, and epidural anesthesia. In Canada, high-quality, modern management radiation therapy practices are consistently offered to patients with cervical cancer. There is a trend toward increased utilization of ISBT. Accumulation of evidence toward the use of ISBT, increased utilization of high-quality imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging, and availability of hybrid applicators are potential contributors for this upward trend.