Alpa V. Patel

A Prospective Study Consortium for the Discovery and Validation of Early Detection Markers for Ovarian Cancer – Baseline Findings for CA125

Abstract Purpose: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a lethal malignancy. Cancer antigen 125 (CA125), the “best” available marker for detecting EOC, has insufficient sensitivity and specificity for earlier-stage disease and is not a meaningful screening tool, motivating the search for further biomarkers. Cancer biomarker discovery is enhanced by “omics” technologies. Discovery studies for EOC biomarkers should be conducted in prediagnosis blood samples from prospective cohorts to maximize the likelihood of identifying markers that can detect disease before usual diagnosis and in earlier disease stage while reducing methodologic biases. Experimental Design: Individual cohorts with prediagnosis blood samples have insufficient sample size for such studies. Thus, we established “Prospective Early Detection Consortium for Ovarian Cancer” (“PREDICT”)—a collaboration of nine prospective studies—to assemble a sufficient number of EOC cases with blood samples collected ≤18 months before diagnosis plus controls. The 457 cases and 1,687 controls have circulating CA125 measured using a clinical assay. Results: The discrimination capacity for single CA125 measurements in samples collected <6 months prior to diagnosis was high (AUC; PREDICT overall = 0.92; range across cohorts of nonpregnant individuals = 0.89–0.98) and declined with extended time between blood collection and diagnosis. Between-cohort variability in CA125 levels and predictive performance was observed. Conclusions: Ongoing investigations in PREDICT are evaluating the early detection potential of tumor-associated autoantibodies and miRNAs using CA125 as a benchmark. PREDICT is a well-characterized resource for identifying and validating detection markers for EOC that may then be used in multimodal screening as a complement to CA125 and combined with imaging.

Germline Mutations in 12 Genes and Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Three Population-Based Cohorts

Abstract Background: With the widespread use of multigene panel genetic testing, population-based studies are necessary to accurately assess penetrance in unselected individuals. We evaluated the prevalence of germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (mutations) in 12 cancer-predisposition genes and associations with ovarian cancer risk in three population-based prospective studies [Nurses’ Health Study (NHS), NHSII, Cancer Prevention Study II]. Methods: We included women with epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer (n = 776) and controls who were alive and had at least one intact ovary at the time of the matched case diagnosis (n = 1,509). Germline DNA was sequenced for mutations in 12 genes. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ovarian cancer risk by mutation status. Results: The mutation frequency across all 12 genes was 11.2% in cases and 3.3% in controls (P < 0.0001). BRCA1 and BRCA2 were the most frequently mutated (3.5% and 3.8% of cases and 0.3% and 0.5% of controls, respectively) and were associated with increased ovarian cancer risk [OR, BRCA1 = 12.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.72–32.45; OR, BRCA2 = 9.18; 95% CI = 3.98–21.15]. Mutation frequencies for the other genes were ≤1.0% and only PALB2 was significantly associated with risk (OR = 5.79; 95% CI = 1.09–30.83). There was no difference in survival for women with a BRCA germline mutation versus no mutation. Conclusions: Further research is needed to better understand the role of other mutations in ovarian cancer among unselected populations. Impact: Our data support guidelines for germline genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 among women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer; testing for PALB2 may be warranted.

Hypertension and Risk of Endometrial Cancer: A Pooled Analysis in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium (E2C2)

Abstract Background: The incidence rates of endometrial cancer are increasing, which may partly be explained by the rising prevalence of obesity, an established risk factor for endometrial cancer. Hypertension, another component of metabolic syndrome, is also increasing in prevalence, and emerging evidence suggests that it may be associated with the development of certain cancers. The role of hypertension independent of other components of metabolic syndrome in the etiology of endometrial cancer remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated hypertension as an independent risk factor for endometrial cancer and whether this association is modified by other established risk factors. Methods: We included 15,631 endometrial cancer cases and 42,239 controls matched on age, race, and study-specific factors from 29 studies in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium. We used multivariable unconditional logistic regression models to estimate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to evaluate the association between hypertension and endometrial cancer and whether this association differed by study design, race/ethnicity, body mass index, diabetes status, smoking status, or reproductive factors. Results: Hypertension was associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09–1.19). There was significant heterogeneity by study design (Phet < 0.01), with a stronger magnitude of association observed among case–control versus cohort studies. Stronger associations were also noted for pre-/perimenopausal women and never users of postmenopausal hormone therapy. Conclusions: Hypertension is associated with endometrial cancer risk independently from known risk factors. Future research should focus on biologic mechanisms underlying this association. Impact: This study provides evidence that hypertension may be an independent risk factor for endometrial cancer.