Alicia Latham

Pathogenic germline variants in patients with endometrial cancer of diverse ancestry

AbstractBackgroundRacial disparities in outcomes exist in endometrial cancer (EC). The contribution of ancestry‐based variations in germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) is unknown.MethodsGermline assessment of ≥76 cancer predisposition genes was performed in patients with EC undergoing tumor‐normal Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets sequencing from January 1, 2015 through June 30, 2021. Self‐reported race/ethnicity and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry data classified patients into groups. Genetic ancestry was inferred from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets. Rates of gPV and genetic counseling were compared by ancestry.ResultsAmong 1625 patients with EC, 216 (13%) had gPVs; 15 had >1 gPV. Rates of gPV varied by self‐reported ancestry (Ashkenazi Jewish, 40/202 [20%]; Asian, 15/124 [12%]; Black/African American (AA), 12/171 [7.0%]; Hispanic, 15/124 [12%]; non‐Hispanic (NH) White, 129/927 [14%]; missing, 5/77 [6.5%]; p = .009], with similar findings by genetic ancestry (p < .001). We observed a lower likelihood of gPVs in patients of Black/AA (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22–0.81) and African (AFR) ancestry (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18–0.85) and a higher likelihood in patients of Ashkenazi Jewish genetic ancestry (OR, 1.62; 95% CI; 1.11–2.34) compared with patients of non‐Hispanic White/European ancestry, even after adjustment for age and molecular subtype. Somatic landscape influenced gPVs with lower rates of microsatellite instability‐high tumors in patients of Black/AA and AFR ancestry. Among those with newly identified gPVs (n = 114), 102 (89%) were seen for genetic counseling, with lowest rates among Black/AA (75%) and AFR patients (67%).ConclusionsIn those with EC, gPV and genetic counseling varied by ancestry, with lowest rates among Black/AA and AFR patients, potentially contributing to disparities in outcomes given implications for treatment and cancer prevention.Plain Language Summary Black women with endometrial cancer do worse than White women, and there are many reasons for this disparity. Certain genetic changes from birth (mutations) can increase the risk of cancer, and it is unknown if rates of these changes are different between different ancestry groups. Genetic mutations in 1625 diverse women with endometrial cancer were studied and the lowest rates of mutations and genetic counseling were found in Black and African ancestry women. This could affect their treatment options as well as their families and may make disparities worse.

Age-Related Germline Landscape of Endometrial Cancer: Focus on Early-Onset Cases

PURPOSE Early-onset endometrial cancer (eoEC) is increasing, and germline drivers may be enriched in younger patients. We sought to define germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in those with EC by age. METHODS We identified patients with EC who underwent clinical tumor-normal sequencing from December 2014 to June 2021 and collected clinical variables. Logistic regression models evaluated associations between age at EC diagnosis and presence of gPV, biallelic inactivation, and Lynch Syndrome (LS). Age categories were defined as early-onset (eoEC, EC < 50 years) and late-onset (EC ≥ 70 years) and were compared with those diagnosed ages 50-69 years. RESULTS Among 1,625 patients with EC, the median age at diagnosis was 63 (range, 24-96) years. We observed gPV in 28 (16%) of 170 patients with eoEC, 152 (14%) of 1,066 patients diagnosed age 50-69 years, and 36 (9%) of 389 patients with late-onset EC ( P = .016). LS was enriched in eoEC, with 6.5% of patients diagnosed age <50 years having LS. In multivariable models compared with those with EC diagnosed age 50-69 years, eoEC was more likely to exhibit biallelic inactivation (odds ratio, 3.34 [95% CI, 1.44 to 7.35]) and be associated with LS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.49 [95% CI, 1.63 to 7.01]). Among early-onset EC, 14 (50%) of 28 gPV were high penetrance and 14 (50%) of 28 exhibited biallelic inactivation. However, heterogeneity was observed, and rates of gPV were 8.9% and 19%, biallelic inactivation was 0% and 11%, and LS was 2.2% and 8% in those diagnosed age <40 years and 40-49 years, respectively. CONCLUSION Rates of gPV, biallelic inactivation, and LS differ across age groups for EC, with high-penetrant genes driving tumorigenesis enriched in younger patients. However, very-early-onset EC may have different drivers and necessitates more research.

Germline Pathogenic Variants and Genetic Counseling by Ancestry in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Mutations in ovarian cancer risk genes are found in women of diverse ancestries, supporting genetic testing for ALL

Risk-Reducing Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy for Ovarian Cancer: A Review and Clinical Guide for Hereditary Predisposition Genes

Pathogenic germline variants underlie up to 20% of ovarian cancer (OC) and are associated with varying degrees of risk for OC. For mutations in high-penetrance genes such as BRCA1/ 2, the role of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in cancer prevention is well-established and improves mortality. However, in moderate-penetrance genes where the degree of risk for OC is less precisely defined, the role of RRSO is more controversial. Although national guidelines have evolved to incorporate gene-specific recommendations, studies demonstrate significant variations in practice. Given this, our multidisciplinary group has reviewed the available literature on risk estimates for genes associated with OC, incorporated levels of evidence, and set thresholds for consideration of RRSO. We found that the benefit of RRSO is well-established for pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 as well as BRIP1 and RAD51C/ D where the risk of OC is elevated beyond our threshold for RRSO. In PALB2, RRSO is particularly controversial as newer studies consistently demonstrate an increased risk of OC that is dependent on family history, making uniform recommendations challenging. Additionally, new guidelines for Lynch syndrome provide gene-specific risks, questioning the role of RRSO, and even hysterectomy, for MSH6 and PMS2 mutation carriers. Given these uncertainties, shared decision making should be used around RRSO with discussion of individual risk factors, family history, and adverse effects of surgery and premature menopause. Herein, we provide a clinical guide and counseling points.