Investigator

Alicia Hulbert

Physician Scientist · Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Division of Research

AHAlicia Hulbert
Papers(1)
<scp>DNA</scp> methyl…
Collaborators(8)
Birgit I. Lissenberg‐…Birgit MM WeverJenneke C. KasiusLisanne VerhoefMaaike CG BleekerRenske DM SteenbergenRianne van den HelderW. Marchien van Baal
Institutions(6)
University Of Illinoi…UMC UtrechtPeter MacCallum Cance…AmsterdamUMCAmsterdam UMC, locati…Flevoziekenhuis

Papers

DNA methylation testing for endometrial cancer detection in urine, cervicovaginal self‐samples and cervical scrapes

AbstractEndometrial cancer incidence is rising and current diagnostics often require invasive biopsy procedures. DNA methylation marker analysis of minimally‐ and non‐invasive sample types could provide an easy‐to‐apply and patient‐friendly alternative to determine cancer risk. Here, we compared the performance of DNA methylation markers to detect endometrial cancer in urine, cervicovaginal self‐samples and clinician‐taken cervical scrapes. Paired samples were collected from 103 patients diagnosed with stage I to IV endometrial cancer. Urine and self‐samples were collected at home. All samples were tested for nine DNA methylation markers using quantitative methylation‐specific PCR. Methylation levels measured in endometrial cancer patients were compared to unpaired samples of 317 healthy controls. Diagnostic performances were evaluated by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis, followed by leave‐one‐out cross‐validation. Each methylation marker showed significantly higher methylation levels in all sample types of endometrial cancer patients compared to healthy controls (P &lt; .01). Optimal three‐marker combinations demonstrated excellent diagnostic performances with area under the receiver operating curve values of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92‐0.98), 0.94 (0.90‐0.97) and 0.97 (0.96‐0.99), for endometrial cancer detection in urine, self‐samples and scrapes, respectively. Sensitivities ranged from 89% to 93% at specificities of 90% to 92%. Virtually equal performances were obtained after cross‐validation and excellent diagnostic performances were maintained for stage I endometrial cancer detection. Our study shows the value of methylation analysis in patient‐friendly sample types for endometrial cancer detection of all stages. This approach has great potential to screen patient populations at risk for endometrial cancer.

Clinical Trials (2)

NCT07400835University of Aarhus

Evaluation of DNA Methylation Markers for Endometrial Cancer Risk-stratification Using Patient-collected Urine and Vaginal Samples and Clinician-collected Cervical Samples From Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding

The goal of this observational study is to investigate the clinical utility of DNA-methylation testing in urine and vaginal samples collected by patients and cervical samples collected by clinicians, to determine the risk of endometrial cancer in symptomatic women with postmenopausal bleeding. The study aims to answer the following research questions: * What is the diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation testing in urine, vaginal and cervical samples compared to traditional TVUS for endometrial cancer detection? * What is the 2-year risk of EC among women testing negative on TVUS and/or DNA methylation tests or those testing positive on methylation only? Researchers will compare DNA methylation testing in patient-collected urine and vaginal samples as well as in clinician-collected cervical samples, with the traditional diagnostic pathway for women with PMB, which includes TVUS evaluation, and when indicated by abnormal TVUS findings, endometrial biopsy according to clinical guidelines. Participants will * take a urine and vaginal sample * have a cervical sample collected by a clinician * undergo TVUS evaluation according to clinical guidelines * If TVUS shows thickened endometrium (≥ 5 mm) and/or irregularity, an endometrial biopsy will be collected according to clinical guidelines * fill out a questionnaire regarding acceptability and preferences of sampling methods and complete a lifestyle questionnaire.

40Works
1Papers
8Collaborators
2Trials

Positions

2022–

Physician Scientist

Jesse Brown VA Medical Center · Division of Research

2019–

Assistant professor

University of Illinois at Chicago · Department of Surgery

2019–

Assistant professor, Affiliated Faculty

University of Illinois at Chicago · Department of Bioengineering

2017–

Visiting Assistant Professor

University of Illinois at Chicago · Department of Surgery

Education

2017

Post-Doctoral Fellow

Johns hopkins Universtiy School of Medicine · Cancer Biology, Epigenetic

2010

Fellow

Jonhs Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health · Drug Dependence Epidemiology

2008

Fellow

Emory University School of Medicine · Psychiatry and Behavior Science

2006

Medical Doctor

St. Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine · Medicine

1997

Bachelor in Arts

Central Connecticut State Univerisity · Psychology