Alessandro Gioè

Hysteroscopic endometrial tumor localization and sentinel lymph node mapping. An upgrade of the hysteroscopic role in endometrial cancer patients

Given the growing interest in sentinel node mapping (SLN) biopsy in Endometrial Cancer (EC) patients, many efforts have been made to maximize the SLN bilateral detection rate. However, at present, no previous research assessed the potential correlation between primary EC location in the uterine cavity and SLN mapping. In this context, this study aims to investigate the possible role of intrauterine EC hysteroscopic localization in predicting SLN nodal placement. EC patients surgically treated from January 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and SLN mapping. During hysteroscopy, the location of the neoplastic lesion was described as follows: uterine fundus (comprising the most cranial portion of the uterine cavity up to the tubal ostium including the cornual areas), corpus uteri (from the tubal ostium to the inner uterine orifice), and diffuse (when the tumor invades more than 50% of the uterine cavity). Three hundred ninety patients met the inclusion criteria. The tumor pattern diffused to the whole uterine cavity was statistically associated with SLN uptake on common iliac lymph nodes (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1-5.8, p = 0.05). Patients'age is an independent factor associated with SLN failure (OR: 0.95, 95%CI 0.93-0.98, p < 0.001). The study showed a statistically significant association between EC hysteroscopically spread throughout the whole uterine cavity and SLN uptake at the common iliac lymph nodes. Furthermore, patient age negatively affected the SLN detection rate.

Substantial lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) as predictor of distant relapse and poor prognosis in low-risk early-stage endometrial cancer

The aim of this study is to analyze the prognostic role of lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI), evaluated in a semi-quantitative fashion on prognosis of early stage, low risk endometrial cancer (EC). We enrolled patients who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer between 2003 and 2018 in two referral cancer center. All patients had endometrioid EC, G1-G2, with myometrial invasion <50%, and no lymph-node involvement. LVSI was analyzed in a semi-quantitative way, according to a 3-tiered scoring system in absent, focal and substantial. Among 524 patients, any positive LVSI was found in 57 patients (10.9%) with focal LVSI (n=35, 6.7%) and substantial LVSI (n=22, 4.2%). Substantial LVSI was associated to higher rate of G2 (p<0.001), myometrial infiltration (p=0.002) and greater tumor dimensions (p=0.014). Patients with substantial LVSI were more likely to receive adjuvant treatment (6.6% vs. 52.6%, p<0.001). The 5-year OS was 99.5% in patients with absent LVSI and 70.6% in those with substantial LVSI (p<0.001). The 5-year disease free survival (DFS) was 93.6% in patients with absent LVSI and 56.5% in those with substantial LVSI (p<0.001). The rate of distant failures increased from 1.8% for absent LVSI to 22.7% for substantial LVSI (p=0.002). In univariate analysis substantial LVSI was the strongest predictor of poor overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]=11.9, p=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that substantial LVSI was an independent predictive factor of both recurrence (HR=5.88, p=0.001) and distant failure (HR=10.6, p=0.006). Substantial LVSI represents the strongest independent risk factor for decreased survival and distant relapse, indicating a role for potential hematogenous dissemination.

Laparoscopic vs. robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer staging: large retrospective single-institution study

The aim of this study is to analyze and draw the potential differences between the robotic-assisted surgery (RS) and the laparoscopy (LPS) in endometrial cancer staging. In this single-institution retrospective study we enrolled 1,221 consecutive clinical stage I-III endometrial cancer patients undergone minimally invasive surgical staging. We compared patients treated by LPS and by RS, on the basis of perioperative and oncological outcomes (disease-free survival [DFS] and overall survival [OS]). A sub-analysis of the high-risk endometrial cancer population was performed in the 2 cohorts. The 2 cohorts (766 treated by LPS and 455 by RS) were homogeneous in terms of perioperative and pathological data. We recorded differences in number of relapse/progression (11.7% in LPS vs. 7% in RS, p=0.008) and in number of deaths (9.8% in LPS vs. 4.8% in RS, p=0.002). Whereas, univariate and multivariate analyses according to DFS and OS confirmed that the surgical approach did not influence the DFS or the OS. In the multivariable analysis the association of the age and grading was significant for DFS and OS. In the sub-analysis of the 426 high risk EC patients (280 in LPS and 146 in RS) the univariate and the multivariate confirmed the influence of the age in DFS and OS, independently of the minimally invasive approach. In our large retrospective analysis, we confirmed that the RS and LPS have similar efficacy and safety for endometrial cancer staging also for the high-risk endometrial cancer patients.