Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj

Diagnostic tests for ovarian cancer in premenopausal women with non-specific symptoms (ROCkeTS): prospective, multicentre, cohort study

Abstract Objective To investigate the accuracy of risk prediction models and scores for diagnosing ovarian cancer in premenopausal women presenting to secondary care with symptoms and abnormal test results. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Secondary care in 23 hospitals in the UK between June 2015 and March 2023. Participants Premenopausal women presenting with non-specific symptoms, and raised serum levels of cancer antigen 125 or abnormal imaging results, were prospectively recruited, predominantly referred through the NHS urgent suspected cancer pathway from primary care. A head-to-head comparison of the accuracy of the six risk prediction models and scores was conducted using donated blood and ultrasound scans performed by NHS staff trained in the use of International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) imaging terminology. The index tests used were Risk of Malignancy Index 1 (with pre-stated thresholds of 200, 250), Risk of Malignancy Algorithm (7.4%, 11.4%, 12.5%, 13.1%), IOTA Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the adnEXa (ADNEX) (3%, 10%), IOTA simple rules risk model (3%, 10%), IOTA simple rules, and cancer antigen 125 (CA 125, 87 IU/mL). Participants were classified as having primary invasive ovarian cancer versus having benign or normal pathology according to the reference standard determined from surgical specimens or biopsies by histology or cytology, if undertaken, or else at 12 month follow-up. After June 2018, because of covid restrictions and concerns about sample size, recruitment was restricted to only women undergoing surgery within three months of presentation to clinic (in whom ovarian cancer was more likely). Main outcome measures Diagnostic accuracy at predicting primary invasive ovarian cancer versus benign or normal histology, assessed by analysing the sensitivity, specificity, C index, area under receiver operating characteristic curve, positive and negative predictive values, and calibration plots in participants with conclusive reference standard results and available index test data. Results 88 of 1211 premenopausal women received diagnoses of primary ovarian cancer: 49 of 857 women in the pre-June 2018 cohort (prevalence of 5.7%) and 39 of 354 women in the post-June 2018 cohort (11.0%). For the diagnosis of primary ovarian cancer (n=799 women, after exclusion of 58 other diagnoses), Risk of Malignancy Index 1 at the 250 threshold had a sensitivity of 42.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 28.3 to 57.8; specificity 96.5%, 94.7 to 97.8). Compared with Risk of Malignancy Index 1 at the 250 threshold, CA 125 and all other tests had higher sensitivity (CA 125 at 87 IU/mL threshold: 55.1%, 40.2 to 69.3, P=0.06; Risk of Malignancy Algorithm at 11.4% threshold: 79.2%, 65.0 to 89.5, P<0.001; IOTA ADNEX at 10% threshold: 89.1%, 76.4 to 96.4, P<0.001; IOTA simple rules risk at 10% threshold: 83.0%, 69.2 to 92.4, P<0.001; IOTA simple rules: 75.0%, 56.6 to 88.5, P=0.01) and lower specificity (CA 125 at 87 IU/mL threshold: 89.0%, 86.5 to 91.2, P<0.001; Risk of Malignancy Algorithm at 11.4% threshold: 73.1%, 69.6 to 76.3, P<0.001; IOTA ADNEX at 10% threshold: 75.1%, 71.4 to 78.6, P<0.001; IOTA simple rules risk at 10% threshold: 76.0%, 72.4 to 79.3, P<0.001; IOTA simple rules: 95.2%, 93.0 to 96.9, P=0.06). Results for IOTA simple rules were inconclusive in 120 of 799 participants. Analysis of the complete cohort (n=1211), including the 354 premenopausal women with a higher likelihood of developing ovarian cancer, yielded similar results. Conclusions Compared to Risk of Malignancy Index 1 at 250 threshold—the test currently used in NHS secondary care to triage women to tertiary care—most tests improve sensitivity but reduce specificity. Ultrasound triage with the IOTA ADNEX model at 10% in secondary care demonstrated the highest sensitivity gain, with a comparable decline in specificity to other comparator tests. Ultrasound with the IOTA ADNEX model at 10% should be considered the new standard of care test for triaging premenopausal women in secondary care. Implementation should incorporate staff training and quality assurance. Trial registration ISRCTN17160843 .

Estimating the Opportunity for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer Using Individual-Patient Data from a Large Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Background: The UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening did not detect a reduction in ovarian cancer mortality with either multimodal screening (MMS) or transvaginal ultrasound screening (USS) compared with no screening. The trial data provide an invaluable resource to quantify the opportunity for interception in ovarian cancer. Methods: We used Bayesian inference to estimate ovarian cancer natural history based on individual screening and cancer diagnosis records from the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening, a randomized controlled ovarian cancer screening trial conducted in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. The trial included 202,638 women ages 50 to 74 years with no family history of ovarian cancer, randomized in a 1:1:2 ratio to annual MMS (serum CA125 interpreted using the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm), annual USS, or no screening. The current analysis included 199,499 women, with 674,806 screens and 2,025 cancer diagnoses. Results: Among high-grade serous cancers (HGSC), the estimated preclinical detectable phase was 1.7 years (95% credible interval, 1.3–2.2), compared with 7.8 years (95% credible interval, 5.7–10.6) for non-HGSCs. The preclinical detectable phase depended on screening modality: for HGSCs, it was longer in the MMS arm (2.2 years) compared with the USS arm (0.8 years), whereas for non-HGSCs, it was shorter in the MMS arm (2.7 years) compared with the USS arm (8.2 years). Conclusions: The interception opportunity for ovarian cancer strongly depends on histologic subtype and screening modality. Impact: Achieving a clinically significant benefit of ovarian cancer early detection will require prolonging the interception window through judicious combination of first- and second-line tests.

Patterns of Associations with Epidemiologic Factors by High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Gene Expression Subtypes

Abstract Background: Ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) comprise four distinct molecular subtypes based on mRNA expression patterns, with differential survival. Understanding risk factor associations is important to elucidate the etiology of HGSC. We investigated associations between different epidemiologic risk factors and HGSC molecular subtypes. Methods: We pooled data from 11 case–control studies with epidemiologic and tumor gene expression data from custom NanoString CodeSets developed through a collaboration within the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. The PrOTYPE-validated NanoString-based 55-gene classifier was used to assign HGSC gene expression subtypes. We examined associations between epidemiologic factors and HGSC subtypes in 2,070 cases and 16,633 controls using multivariable-adjusted polytomous regression models. Results: Among the 2,070 HGSC cases, 556 (27%) were classified as C1.MES, 340 (16%) as C5.PRO, 538 (26%) as C2.IMM, and 636 (31%) as C4.DIF. The key factors, including oral contraceptive use, parity, breastfeeding, and family history of ovarian cancer, were similarly associated with all subtypes. Heterogeneity was observed for several factors. Former smoking [OR = 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03, 1.51] and genital powder use (OR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.08, 1.86) were uniquely associated with C2.IMM. History of endometriosis was associated with C5.PRO (OR = 1.46; 95% CI = 0.98, 2.16) and C4.DIF (OR = 1.27; 95% CI = 0.94, 1.71) only. Family history of breast cancer (OR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.16, 1.78) and current smoking (OR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.11, 1.76) were associated with C4.DIF only. Conclusions: This study observed heterogeneous associations of epidemiologic and modifiable factors with HGSC molecular subtypes. Impact: The different patterns of associations may provide key information about the etiology of the four subtypes.

Association of hysterectomy and invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer: a cohort study within UKCTOCS

ObjectiveTo investigate the association between hysterectomy with conservation of one or both adnexa and ovarian and tubal cancer.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingThirteen NHS Trusts in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.PopulationA total of 202 506 postmenopausal women recruited between 2001 and 2005 to the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) and followed up until 31 December 2014.MethodsMultiple sources (questionnaires, hospital notes, Hospital Episodes Statistics, national cancer/death registries, ultrasound reports) were used to obtain accurate data on hysterectomy (with conservation of one or both adnexa) and outcomes censored at bilateral oophorectomy, death, ovarian/tubal cancer diagnosis, loss to follow up or 31 December 2014. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the association.Main outcome measuresInvasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer (WHO 2014) on independent outcome review.ResultsHysterectomy with conservation of one or both adnexa was reported in 41 912 (20.7%; 41 912/202 506) women. Median follow up was 11.1 years (interquartile range 9.96–12.04), totalling >2.17 million woman‐years. Among women who had undergone hysterectomy, 0.55% (231/41 912) were diagnosed with ovarian/tubal cancer, compared with 0.59% (945/160 594) of those with intact uterus. Multivariable analysis showed no evidence of an association between hysterectomy and invasive epithelial ovarian/tubal cancer (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.85–1.13, P = 0.765).ConclusionsThis large cohort study provides further independent validation that hysterectomy is not associated with alteration of invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer risk. These data are important both for clinical counselling and for refining risk prediction models.Tweetable abstractHysterectomy does not alter risk of invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer.

Development and Validation of the Gene Expression Predictor of High-grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Molecular SubTYPE (PrOTYPE)

Abstract Purpose: Gene expression–based molecular subtypes of high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSOC), demonstrated across multiple studies, may provide improved stratification for molecularly targeted trials. However, evaluation of clinical utility has been hindered by nonstandardized methods, which are not applicable in a clinical setting. We sought to generate a clinical grade minimal gene set assay for classification of individual tumor specimens into HGSOC subtypes and confirm previously reported subtype-associated features. Experimental Design: Adopting two independent approaches, we derived and internally validated algorithms for subtype prediction using published gene expression data from 1,650 tumors. We applied resulting models to NanoString data on 3,829 HGSOCs from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. We further developed, confirmed, and validated a reduced, minimal gene set predictor, with methods suitable for a single-patient setting. Results: Gene expression data were used to derive the predictor of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma molecular subtype (PrOTYPE) assay. We established a de facto standard as a consensus of two parallel approaches. PrOTYPE subtypes are significantly associated with age, stage, residual disease, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and outcome. The locked-down clinical grade PrOTYPE test includes a model with 55 genes that predicted gene expression subtype with >95% accuracy that was maintained in all analytic and biological validations. Conclusions: We validated the PrOTYPE assay following the Institute of Medicine guidelines for the development of omics-based tests. This fully defined and locked-down clinical grade assay will enable trial design with molecular subtype stratification and allow for objective assessment of the predictive value of HGSOC molecular subtypes in precision medicine applications. See related commentary by McMullen et al., p. 5271

High Prediagnosis Inflammation-Related Risk Score Associated with Decreased Ovarian Cancer Survival

Abstract Background: There is suggestive evidence that inflammation is related to ovarian cancer survival. However, more research is needed to identify inflammation-related factors that are associated with ovarian cancer survival and to determine their combined effects. Methods: This analysis used pooled data on 8,147 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. The prediagnosis inflammation-related exposures of interest included alcohol use; aspirin use; other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use; body mass index; environmental tobacco smoke exposure; history of pelvic inflammatory disease, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and endometriosis; menopausal hormone therapy use; physical inactivity; smoking status; and talc use. Using Cox proportional hazards models, the relationship between each exposure and survival was assessed in 50% of the data. A weighted inflammation-related risk score (IRRS) was developed, and its association with survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models in the remaining 50% of the data. Results: There was a statistically significant trend of increasing risk of death per quartile of the IRRS [HR = 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03–1.14]. Women in the upper quartile of the IRRS had a 31% higher death rate compared with the lowest quartile (95% CI, 1.11–1.54). Conclusions: A higher prediagnosis IRRS was associated with an increased mortality risk after an ovarian cancer diagnosis. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate whether postdiagnosis exposures are also associated with survival. Impact: Given that pre- and postdiagnosis exposures are often correlated and many are modifiable, our study results can ultimately motivate the development of behavioral recommendations to enhance survival among patients with ovarian cancer.

Concurrent RB1 Loss and BRCA Deficiency Predicts Enhanced Immunologic Response and Long-term Survival in Tubo-ovarian High-grade Serous Carcinoma

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate RB1 expression and survival across ovarian carcinoma histotypes and how co-occurrence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alterations and RB1 loss influences survival in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Experimental Design: RB1 protein expression was classified by immunohistochemistry in ovarian carcinomas of 7,436 patients from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. We examined RB1 expression and germline BRCA status in a subset of 1,134 HGSC, and related genotype to overall survival (OS), tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes, and transcriptomic subtypes. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we deleted RB1 in HGSC cells with and without BRCA1 alterations to model co-loss with treatment response. We performed whole-genome and transcriptome data analyses on 126 patients with primary HGSC to characterize tumors with concurrent BRCA deficiency and RB1 loss. Results: RB1 loss was associated with longer OS in HGSC but with poorer prognosis in endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Patients with HGSC harboring both RB1 loss and pathogenic germline BRCA variants had superior OS compared with patients with either alteration alone, and their median OS was three times longer than those without pathogenic BRCA variants and retained RB1 expression (9.3 vs. 3.1 years). Enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin and paclitaxel was seen in BRCA1-altered cells with RB1 knockout. Combined RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency correlated with transcriptional markers of enhanced IFN response, cell-cycle deregulation, and reduced epithelial–mesenchymal transition. CD8+ lymphocytes were most prevalent in BRCA-deficient HGSC with co-loss of RB1. Conclusions: Co-occurrence of RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency was associated with exceptionally long survival in patients with HGSC, potentially due to better treatment response and immune stimulation.

Improving Specificity for Ovarian Cancer Screening Using a Novel Extracellular Vesicle–Based Blood Test

The low incidence of ovarian cancer (OC) dictates that any screening strategy needs to be both highly sensitive and highly specific. This study explored the utility of detecting multiple colocalized proteins or glycosylation epitopes on single tumor-associated extracellular vesicles from blood. The novel Mercy Halo Ovarian Cancer Test (OC Test) uses immunoaffinity capture of tumor-associated extracellular vesicles, followed by proximity-ligation real-time quantitative PCR to detect combinations of up to three biomarkers to maximize specificity, and measures multiple combinations to maximize sensitivity. A high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) case-control training set of EDTA plasma samples from 397 women was used to lock down the test design, the data interpretation algorithm, and the cutoff between cancer and noncancer. Performance was verified and compared with cancer antigen 125 in an independent blinded case-control set of serum samples from 390 women (132 controls, 66 HGSC, 83 non-HGSC OC, and 109 benign). In the verification study, the OC Test showed a specificity of 97.0% (128/132; 95% CI, 92.4%-99.6%), a HGSC sensitivity of 97.0% (64/66; 95% CI, 87.8%-99.2%), and an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99) and detected 73.5% (61/83; 95% CI, 62.7%-82.6%) of the non-HGSC OC cases. This test exhibited fewer false positives in subjects with benign ovarian tumors, nonovarian cancers, and inflammatory conditions when compared with cancer antigen 125. The combined sensitivity and specificity of this new test suggests that it may have potential in OC screening.