Alberto Revelli

Oncolytic Viruses in Ovarian Cancer: Where Do We Stand? A Narrative Review

Ovarian cancer (OC) remains the most lethal gynecologic malignancy with limited effective treatment options. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for cancer treatment, capable of selectively infecting and lysing cancer cells while stimulating anti-tumor immune responses. Preclinical studies have demonstrated significant tumor regression and prolonged survival in OC models using various OVs, such as herpes simplex. Early-phase clinical trials have shown a favorable safety profile, though the impact on patient survival has been modest. Current research focuses on combining OVs with other treatments like immune checkpoint inhibitors to enhance their efficacy. We provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding and future directions for utilizing OVs in the management of OC.

Targeting TOP2A in Ovarian Cancer: Biological and Clinical Implications

The enzyme topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) plays a critical role in DNA replication and cell proliferation, making it a promising target for cancer therapy. In epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), TOP2A overexpression is associated with poor prognosis and resistance to conventional treatments. This review explores the biological functions of TOP2A in EOC and discusses its potential as a therapeutic target. We highlight studies on the mechanisms through which TOP2A contributes to tumor progression and recurrence. Additionally, we evaluate the clinical implications of targeting TOP2A, including the use of TOP2A inhibitors and their combination with novel drugs. We provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding and future directions for targeting TOP2A in the management of EOC.

Fertility-sparing vs hysterectomy for uterine STUMP: A pragmatic clinical study.

Uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) are rare neoplasms with unpredictable clinical behavior. Optimal management, particularly in reproductive-aged women, remains controversial, with limited data comparing the safety of fertility-sparing versus hysterectomy. This multicentre retrospective cohort study included women aged 18-85 with histologically confirmed STUMP treated at 17 Italian gynecologic oncology centers from 2010 to 2023. Patients underwent either fertility-sparing surgery (myomectomy or hysteroscopic resection) or definitive surgery (hysterectomy ± salpingo-oophorectomy). Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Median (range) follow-up was 51 (1-291) months. Among 401 women, 106 (26.4 %) received fertility-sparing treatment (mean [± SD] age: 35.3 ± 6.8 years) and 295 (73.6 %) underwent definitive surgery (mean [± SD] age: 47.7 ± 9.2). At total follow-up, recurrence occurred in 12.5 % of patients, predominantly within the pelvis. Median RFS was longer after definitive surgery than after fertility-sparing procedures (50.0 vs 42.5 months; HR 2.39 [95 % CI 1.36-4.19]), although this difference disappeared when benign (leiomyoma) recurrences were excluded (HR 1.74 [95 % CI 0.90-3.34]). At last available follow-up, 97.5 % of patients were alive, with no significant OS difference between treatment groups (HR 0.22 [95 % CI 0.27-1.79]). Outcomes were comparable across menopausal status and concurrent adnexal removal. Definitive surgery reduces recurrence risk, but long-term survival is similarly excellent after fertility-sparing surgery in appropriately selected women with STUMP. Conservative management represents a reasonable option for patients desiring fertility, provided they receive counseling regarding recurrence risk, diagnostic uncertainty, and the need for long-term surveillance.